Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Plan Number - S07-110
Review Name: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/09/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/16/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: MOUNTAIN VAIL ESTATES S07-110 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the Revised tentative plat & Core Resub submitted November 10, 2010. TEP approves the plat. When the plat has been approved by the City of Tucson submit to my attention a copy of the signed Approved Plat. TEP will provide a revised electrical design within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. The completion of the electrical design is necessary to determine our easement requirements and review the final plat. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Electronic AutoCad Plan format: 1. An Electronic AutoCad plan must be complete and identical to the official hard copy (paper) project (subdivision, commercial) plat. 2. The AutoCAD plan must be a civil site plan drawing. (The majority of time an electrical site plan drawing does not have the required information.) 3. A single AutoCAD plan drawing containing all the layers should be submitted. 4. AutoCAD plan should be in DWG format. 5. AutoCAD Version can be 2007 or lower. 6. 2D only, not 3D (Please take out reference images and 3D images.) 7. Please take out the topography Layer. 8. Layers relate to a unique set of CAD features within the drawing. (For example all lot lines should be on one layer, street centerlines another layer.) 9. Include the required Layers: Lot Lines, Right of Way lines, Street Centerlines, Buildings, Curbs, Basin, Section Lines, Boundary of Property, Footages, Bearings, Lot Numbers, Street Names, and Tie Down (Section or Quarter Pins.) 10. At least three tie points are required; one must be a Section or a Quarter pin and the others may be street intersections or lot corners. Bearings and distances must be designated from the tie points. 11. Please include the Boundary Line of Property. It must be designated with bearings and distances. 12. Any special fonts, X-REFs, or attachments should be submitted along with the CAD drawing. Please contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent II Tucson Electric Power Co. offc-(520) 917-8745 fax-(520) 545-1416 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 11/17/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/19/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: S07-110 MOUNTAIN VAIL ESTATES/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: November 18, 2010 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Include all the re-subdivision information on all title blocks. Label lots consecutively. Label Lupine Flower Drive on sheet 19. Label Desert Daffodil Drive on sheet 21. Label Desert Squash Drive on sheet 22. Delete Green Park Drive on sheet 23. Complete all street names on sheets 29 and 31. |
| 11/22/2010 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner - Zoning Review Section PROJECT: S07-110 (revision) Mountain Vail Estates Revision to overall Tentative plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 22, 2010 DUE DATE: November 24, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is November 23, 2011. 2. Revise case number S07-135 to S07-138 in the title block and where it appears. The case number S07-135 appears in several areas and on in the title block of all plan sheets. 3. Remove all references to FLD-4. This plat will maintain its RCP approval. 4. It is suggested that the School site be labeled as a block rather than a residential lot of the subdivision. 5. List the specific area in square feet and acreage of both the school site and the remaining residential development if different when the school area is subtracted from the revised subdivision. All calculations should be revised as required. 6. Revise rezoning condition one to include the new date as noted in the August 4, 2010 exhibit "A" to Ordinance 10831. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07110tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat and if applicable additional requested documents. |
| 11/22/2010 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/23/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/23/2010 | NONE | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | >> Rebecca Noel 11/23/2010 3:36 PM >>> I have no objections at this time in regards to this project. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 11/23/2010 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 11/23/2010, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Mountain Vail Estates S07-110, T15S, R16E, SECTION 31 RECEIVED: Revised Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on November 10, 2010 The subject submittal has been reviewed. The Revised Drainage Report is acceptable for Tentative Plat purposes and it is hereby approved. Additional drainage information may be required with the grading plan submittal. The Tentative Plat is acceptable and it is recommended for a conditional approval, pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain Review, subject to Zoning Review approval of the proposed revisions. |
| 11/24/2010 | MPADILL1 | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S07-110 Mountain Vail Estates (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-16 - Weinberg - MaryAnn Cleveland Way NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: H.A.M.P. SCENIC ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: November 24, 2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: November 23, 2010 Department of Planning and Development Services Community Planning Section S07-110 Mountain Vail Estates Tentative Plat November 23, 2010 Tentative plat S07-110 was previously reviewed by Community Planning staff in July of 2008. Since then, tentative plat S07-110 has been redesigned and will include a replat to address the conversion of a previous common area (Private Park) into lot 525 and dedicated for a future public school site. Based on the revise tentative plat, Community Planning staff offer the following comments: 1. Please revise tentative plat S07-110, sheets 21 to show the "ten foot wide non-motorized public trail easement," along the western perimeter of lot 525. Sheet 24 shows the location of easement, where the two sheets overlap. 2. Please revise tentative plat S07-110, sheets 21and/or 24 to show how a continues undisturbed twelve (12) foot wide meandering pedestrian walkway (required as per Key Note #38 for the Esmond Station Rail Line & Trail alignment), connects to the "Ten foot wide non-motorized public trail easement," located along the western perimeter of lot 525. Please show whether the location of the twelve foot wide pedestrian easement will continue along the Esmond Station Rail Line & Trail alignment within lot 525, or if due to future school improvements, is it being redesigned/rerouted. At all points, the 12 foot wide meandering pedestrian walkway shall meet ADA standards. 3. Please revise tentative plat S07-110, sheets 16 & 18, to show all areas identified as "10' non-motorized public trail easement," located along the northern and eastern perimeter on sheet 16 and along the eastern and southern perimeter of sheet 18, to be outside of grading/slope design and drainage/flow infrastructures, unless the revisions show they meet ADA standards and as approved by the Department of Parks and Recreation. A written approval from Parks and Recreation to be included in the resubmittal. |
| 11/29/2010 | JWILLIA4 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Due Date Case Number Project Address November 24, 2010 S07-110 Mountain Vail Estates Revised Tentative Plat Comments: The proposed Revised Tentative Plat for the Mountain Vail Estates, Case No. S07-110, meets the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal Standard 6-01.0 and is here Approved, Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/30/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PCWWM will contact applicant and provide comments at later date. |
| 11/30/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | November 30, 2010 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S07-110 PROJECT NAME: Mountain Vail Estates PROJECT ADDRESS: Houghton Rd/Mary Ann Cleveland Way PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Let's have a meeting and discuss access. The city would like to see a separation in access from the school and the residential use. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/30/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR ` FAX: (520) 620-0135 December 6, 2010 To: Warren Thompson, PE Stantec Consulting Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: Mountain Vail Estates Part A-G The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Detail Sheets 7-15. Provide sewer crossing information (pipe size, invert elevation and vertical distance relative to other utilities) at pertinent cross sections. All Plan Sheets: Clearly label all sewer pipe, as either public or private. Sheet 16 & 17: The recorded final plat for this subdivision (Book 64, Page 59) indentifies a 10’ public sewer easement parallel to Atterbury Wash Way. The proposed 4” private force main is shown within this easement. Revise the final plat to remove references to public sewer easements in which private sewer is proposed. Sheet 21: Provide easements to MH # 6 consistent with Accesbility standards A-3. Sheet 22: Provide information on the plans that unobstructed vehicular access, consistent with RWRD engineering standards A-3 for the portion of the sewer line indentified as SWR-69. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $200 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 12/01/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 1, 2010 Warren Thompson Stantec 201 N. Bonita Ave. # 101 Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: S07-110 MOUNTAIN VAIL ESTATES Tentative Plat Dear Warren: Your submittal of October 27/2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 6 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Addressing, Zoning, Planning, Wastewater, Traffic, PDSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Letter from Parks and Recreation (Planning, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at (520) 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 750-7470 |