Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S07-110
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/08/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/10/2008 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | July 9, 2008 To: Warren Thompson Stantec Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Mountain Vail Estates Residential Cluster Project, Part "A", Lots 1-135, Part "B", Lots 136-183 Part "C", Lots 184-215, Part "D", Lots 216-242 and 287-322, Part "E", Lots 243- 286, Part "F", Lots 323-338 and 346-384, Part "G", and Lots 339-345 and 385-501 Tent. Plat - 4th Submittal(rev) S07-110 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/14/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/24/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S07-110 Mountain Vail Estates 07/24/08 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-16 – Weinberg – MaryAnn Cleveland Way NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: H.A.M.P. SCENIC ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: August 5, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: May 29, 2008 REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: July 24, 2008 |
| 07/28/2008 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 07/28/2008, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Mountain Vail Estates S07-110, T15S, R16E, SECTION 31 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on July 08, 2008 The subject submittal has been reviewed. The Drainage Report is acceptable for Tentative Plat purposes and it is hereby approved. Additional drainage information may be required with the grading plan submittal. The Tentative Plat is acceptable and it is recommended for a conditional approval, pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain Review, subject to the approval of the Development Standard Modification Request DS08-29. Submit with the Tentative Plat Mylar written verification that the DSMR has been approved. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat Mylar with DSMR approval letter |
| 08/01/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/05/2008 | ANDY STEUART | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Approval from Real Estate can be provided upon acceptance from Environmental Services to a Phase I ESA concerned with the Esmond Station Rail corridor. The corridor is proposed as a public trail. Environmental Services has requested additional testing to soils within the corridor be completed prior acception the report. |
| 08/06/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S07-110 MOUNTAIN VAIL ESTATES/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 8/04/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project on the condition that the comments are changed on the final mylar. Spell out Drive of Desert Squash Dr. on pg. 1. Correct ghosted lot numbers on pg. 16. Change Green Park Loop to Drive on pgs. 22& 24. Change Chevrolet Avenue to Drive on pg. 23. Label all streets on pgs. 23, 27 & 28. Complete street names on pgs. 25, 26, 27 & 30. Change Rabbit Run Loop to Way on pg. 25. Change Rincon Ranch Drive to Rincon Range Drive on pg. 31. Change Ribcon Range Drive to Rincon Range Drive on pg. 32. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 08/06/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee CASE NAME & NUMBER: S07-110, Mountain Vail Estates Submittal #: 5 COMMENTS DUE: August 5, 2008 COMMENTS SENT: August 5, 2008 Items reviewed: Tentative Plat and Landscape Plan Related: rezoning - C9-06-15/16 land use plan(s) – Houghton Area Master Plan Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: NOT APPROVED – Please resubmit the tentative plat and landscape plan, and address the following comments. 1) Esmond Station Rail Line Corridor Public Trail Corridor. Parks staff has requested that the rail line corridor be granted to the City of Tucson for public, non-motorized recreational trail purposes, subject to a review by City staff of an Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), as the rail bed contains ballast. Pending receipt of an “OK” from City of Tucson Environmental Services and Attorney’s Office staff, it is acceptable to show the Esmond Station Rail Line Corridor as Common Area “C”; grant a public, non-motorized recreational trail easement to the City for the rail line corridor; and have the corridor maintained by the Homeowner’s Association (HOA), subject to the easement being written so that it can be maintained by the City Parks and Recreation Department if the need arises. Detailed Section Through Trail Corridor. Thank you for providing General Notes 61 and 62, and typical trailway corridor section 2 on sheet 6. In addition to the typical section, please add a detailed section through the trail corridor, showing that the rail bed will be preserved in place. Also indicate on the plat where the rail bed will be preserved in place. Trail Width. As per previous discussions, the asphalt trail needs to be 12 feet wide; a 10-foot width is not acceptable. Please revise detail 2 on sheet 6 and keynote 38 on the plat, and revise the landscape plans accordingly. Trail Design. Staff acknowledges that the trails have conceptually been shown at a cross slope such that drainage will flow across them. Mountain Vail Estates, S07-110 Rail Bed Corridor/final plat. Because the rail bed shows up as a topographic feature on the tentative plat, it is easily identifiable, and serves as a feature around which the trail and landscaping within the corridor can be located. However, no topographic information will be provided on the final plat, which will make it difficult to ascertain whether the public trail corridor easement is correctly located relative to the rail line. Staff requests that the topographic rail bed feature be shown in a surveyable manner on the final plat for reference purposes. f) Interpretive Display. Please revise the wording of General Note #63 so that it reads as follows: “The owner/developer shall provide an interpretive display along the Esmond Station Rail Line Corridor. Prior to its construction, display details shall be approved by the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department.” g) Esmond Station Public Trail Corridor. It is acceptable to grant a public trail easement over Common Area C, however, the intent to dedicate must be clearly shown along the corridor. Please place a note along the corridor (on each plat sheet as appropriate) that says, “Non-motorized, public trail easement to be granted to the City of Tucson by final plat. Easement wording to be approved by Parks and Recreation Department.” h) Phasing of Trail Corridor Improvements. Please add the following General Note: “This project will be constructed in phases. The trail corridor improvements along the Esmond-Station rail line corridor may be constructed in entirety at the beginning, or in phases B, C, D and G. If these improvements are phased, they must be constructed, inspected by, and acceptable to the City of Tucson prior to the release of the first occupancy permit for a dwelling unit in each respective phase.” 2) Miscellanous Comments As the owner/developer has declined staff’s request to show recreational facility details on the plat, as per plat keynote 23, please add the following General Note: “Improvement plan number _________ for this project, showing the type and location of recreational improvements, must be reviewed and approved by the Parks and Recreation Department, relative to recreational facility details.” As per Development Services, the specific improvement plan number must be provided on the tentative plat prior to tentative plat approval. On sheet 21, there’s a section through the roadway in the vicinity of lot 165 and the large park area to the west, and a callout for detail 14 on sheet 7, however, the detail does not match the section (there is not an 8-foot meandering pathway shown in this area). Please revise so that the detail and section match. Mountain Vail Estates, S07-110 Thank you for providing trail signs along the trail where it crosses the two onsite roadways (Granite Gulch Way and Atterbury Wash Way). Please also provide trail crossing signs along the roadways, so that motorists will be aware of the trail crossings. The roadway trail crossings are to be of a different texture and color than the surrounding roadway. Please show the signs and roadway crossing details on the plat. Please add keynote 17 to the 8-foot pathways between lots 475 and 476, 352 and 353, 365 and 366, and 372 and 373; south of lots 410-423; west of Common Area B-10; east of lots 1-8; and west of the large park at the northwest end of the Esmond-Station rail line. It is possible that some of these are on the plans but they may have been lost when staff cut and pasted the plans together. On detail 13, sheet 10, please indicate that the Esmond Station Rail Corridor is in Common Area C, not B. Part A, North of Mary Ann Cleveland Way – Staff’s previous comment has been addressed – thank you. No additional comments. Parts B and C, South of and Adjacent to Mary Ann Cleveland Way (includes large park area at northwest end of rail corridor) Parking for Large Park west of Lots 160-168. As previously requested, parking in accordance with Land Use Code requirements must be provided onsite. It is staff’s understanding that parking will be provided on the two streets that border the park. Detail 14 on sheet 7 (along Green Park Drive) shows an 8-foot parking lane adjacent to the park, however, detail 2 on sheet 7 (along Atterbury Wash Way) does not show a parking lane. It must be demonstrated that sufficient parking near the park will be provided. As requested previously, please show on the plat the number of parking spaces required per the Land Use Code, and the number of parking spaces provided. Show the parking spaces provided near the park on the tentative plat. Parts D and E (southwest portion of project) Vehicular Access. Based on discussions with the owner/developer on 7/31/08, a 10-foot-wide, public access easement with removable bollards will be provided from Crowley Brothers Drive to Common Area B (west of lots 243-246), as previously requested. The intent is to provide vehicular access from onsite, should the need arise. Please show this easement on the plat, including how it will be dedicated. Parts F and G (southwest portion of project) Pedestrian Connectivity. On sheet 31, please demonstrate pedestrian connectivity between the end of the spur trail along the western edge of Common Area B-10 and the sidewalk along Granite Gulch Way near lot 409. Mountain Vail Estates, S07-110 Atterbury Wash, Blanket Public Trail Easement. On sheet 28, please show a blanket, public, non-motorized trail easement across the Atterbury Wash, in the area northeast of the toe-of-slope behind lots 333-345. Please contact Joanne Hershenhorn at 837-6965 if you’d like to discuss these comments. REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 8/5/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsS07-110b_Mountain_Vail_Estates.doc |
| 08/12/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner PROJECT: S07-110, Mountain Vail Estates, Tentative Plat Resubmittal, 4th Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 12, 2008 DUE DATE: August 5, 2008 COMMENTS: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL Resubmit revised drawings with a response letter, stating how all Zoning Review comments were addressed. 1. CURRENT/PRIOR REVIEW: add lot number & common areas to CC&Rs title sheet. Your response indicates this was done. Unable to verify, no CCRs in submittal. 2. CURRENT/PRIOR REVIEW: proposed public roadway link between phase 1 & phase 3 and proposed drainage improvements construction is on a unrelated parcel. A signed agreement and dedication must be provided from property owner allowing off-site road improvement within the access easement on that parcel. This is required in case proposed subdivision for rezoning case C9-06-15 is postponed or never constructed. Your response provided a letter from a Leslie Shipley, stating separate access and drainage easements, etc would be allowed to be recorded on parcel 205-64-076E, in event Mountain Vail Shipley plat slated for that parcel was not recorded nor developed. Per Engineering staff, further items are needed from the property owner of identified parcel. The property owner must provide a written statement with the following: A) state they are the property owner of the parcel, identifying it by tax code and address B) granting permission for MC140, LLC, to construct access and drainage work and any necessary easements as indicated on Mountain Vail Estates plat S07-110 for purposes shown in stated plat C) the above work shall not have any time constraints D) the letter has to be notarized 3) Page 29: Basin B-10, near lot 389, is a new path. The slope provided at 6:1 in basin is greater than 5%, which is not accessible. Provide accessible route. 4. Please note, depending upon responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. C:Heather\planning\\tentativeplat\S07-110 mountain vail estates 3rd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, & CC&R's and above requested agreement. |
| 08/16/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 16, 2008 Warren D. Thompson Stantec Consulting, Inc. 201 North Bonita Avenue, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: S07-110 Mountain Vail Estates Tentative Plat Dear Warren: Your submittal of July 8, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Real Estate, Addressing, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (DUPD, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Phase I ESA (Real Estate, DSD) Per comments from DUPD, written approval is required from OCSD prior to approval of this tentative plat. Please note that the one-year review period for this plat has expired. Prior to resubmittal, a written request for an extension must be submitted to and approved by the CDRC office. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 750-7470 |