Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S07-110
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/28/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | No parking sign are required on both sides of Detail 16 on 7. The no parking sign should be the detail in the amended Appendix D of the IFC. |
| 05/05/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 2, 2008 To: Warren Thompson Stantec Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Mountain Vail Estates Residential Cluster Project, Part “A”, Lots 1-135, Part “B”, Lots 136-183 Part “C”, Lots 184-215, Part “D”, Lots 216-242 and 287-322, Part “E”, Lots 243- 286, Part “F”, Lots 323-338 and 346-384, Part “G”, and Lots 339-345 and 385-501 Tent. Plat – 3rd Submittal(rev) S07-110 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet 31 and 32: Revise the inverts and or sewer line table so that the sewer line as shown will work by gravity flow and the slopes and lengths will match up for SWR-90 and SWR-89. Currently MH#64 has a lower invert then MH#63 and the slope for SWR-89 does not match the inverts shown for MH#63 and MH#61. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the fourth(4th) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 05/06/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/07/2008 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: MOUNTAIN VAIL ESTATES S07-110 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat submitted April 25, 2008. TEP is approves the plat. All costs associated with the relocation of existing facilities will be billable to the developer. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within thirty (30) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745. Liza Castillo, Right of Way Agent II Tucson Electric Power Co. Unisource Energy Services offc-(520) 917-8745 fax-(520) 545-1416 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 05/07/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S07-110 MOUNTAIN VAIL ESTATES/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 5/07/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete all adjacent dockets and pages. The street labeled Green Park Loop will require 3 street names. One adjacent to 136-150, one adjacent to 151-160 and one adjacent to 160-168. The suffixes should be Drive, Lane, Road, Trail or Way. The street labeled Rabbit Run Loop will require 4 street names. One adjacent to lots 291-292, one adjacent to 323-345, 488-501, one adjacent to 410-423 and one adjacent to 379-401. The suffixes should be Avenue (for North-South) street (for east-west) or Drive, Lane, Road, Trail or Way. Some of the street names were approved in an earlier review. Upon further review some of the streets should not have been approved. I apologize for the oversight. Spell out drive of Desert Squash Dr on pg. 1. Delete Chevrolet Avenue on pg. 22. Change Crowley Brother Drive to Crowley Brothers Drive on pg. 26. Delete Chevrolet Ave on Location Map. es |
| 05/19/2008 | ANDY STEUART | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Request a Phase I EAS be provided concerning C.A. "B", the Esmond RR Corridor and proposed trail system. Until the requested Phase I report is provided, Real Estate reserves comment. |
| 05/21/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: S07-110 Mountain Vail Estates Tentative Plat Resubmittal, 3rd Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 21, 2008 DUE DATE: May 22, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. PRIOR REVIEW: The lands which lies within the AEZ must be given a block number and remain as part of the subdivision unless the property has been split prior to tentative plat approval. Because it is within the ADC-3 of the Airport Environs Overlay, its area cannot be counted toward compliance to RCP criteria for density and site coverage. Your response indicated you are requesting to split off the land. The actual lot split process can be done over the counter. Provide copies of a drawing, legal descriptions and easements that may be required. Bring this information to the zoning counter at DSD, then follow the review procedure for lot splits as prescribed at the zoning counter. Once the lot split is done, the area shown on the tentative plat currently as "unsubdivided" should be omitted from the plat drawings. 2. PRIOR REVIEW: Please add lot number and common areas to title sheet of CC&Rs. Your response indicates this was done. I am unable to verify, as I have not received a revised copy of the CCRs within the submittal package. 3. PRIOR REVIEW: The proposed public roadway link between phase 1 and phase 3 and proposed drainage improvements construction is on a separate parcel that is not part of this subdivision. A signed agreement and dedication must be provided from the property owner allowing the off-site improvement of the road to be done within the access easement on that parcel. Per Engineering this will still be required incase proposed subdivision for rezoning case C9-06-15 is postponed or never constructed Your response indicates that the adjacent subdivision, S07-173, provides this agreement and will be constructed at the same time. Please provide copies of the signed agreement, per the above. Staff needs to see this information please. Thank you. 4) (last review) regarding sidewalks: A) Page 22, SW Chevrolet/Atterbury - Add widths of sidewalks in Common Area B B) Page 22, same-Add slope of sidewalks in common area B - must be accessible route 5) Page 29: A) in the Basin B-10, near lot 389, is a new path. Label width and provide slope to ensure it is an accessible route 6. Please note, depending upon responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. I acknowledge the Scenic and Wash Overlay, T07SA00168, has been approved. C:Heather\planning\\tentativeplat\S07-110 mountain vail estates 4th.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, & CC&R's and above requested agreement. |
| 05/23/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 05/23/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. Will require temporary turnarounds within each phase for collection vehicle to manuever within development. Clarify how you will meet this requirement. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/29/2008 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 05/29/2008, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Mountain Vail Estates S07-110, T15S, R16E, SECTION 31 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on April 25, 2008 The subject submittal has been reviewed. The Drainage Report and the Tentative Plat shall be approved after the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the Drainage Report and on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. Basins B1 and B2 outlets appear to concentrate the discharge onto adjacent parcels, which is not acceptable. Revise the basin outlet design to reestablish pre-development discharge patterns and reduce discharge energy. The basin outlets may be flared out to allow the discharge to be in more spread out fashion that will not have erosive velocities. Tentative Plat: 1. Cross-section Detail 6/6 does not look like the standard 100' right of way street cross section, shown in Development Standard 3-01.0. Check with "Permits and Codes" if the proposed cross section is acceptable and revise as necessary. Provide written acceptance by TDOT and apply for a Development Standard modification request (DSMR) for the proposed modification (D.S.1-01.4.7.). The DSMR case number shall be included on the Tentative Plat 2. Cross-section Detail 4/8 does not look like the standard 51' right of way street cross section, shown in Development Standard 3-01.0. Check with "Permits and Codes" if the proposed cross section is acceptable and revise as necessary. Provide written acceptance by TDOT and apply for a DSMR for the proposed modification (D.S.1-01.4.7.). The DSMR case number shall be included on the Tentative Plat. 3. Address Zoning Review comments concerning the proposed tentative plat changes from the previous submittal and how they relate to Engineering and Floodplain Review. 4. Revise the Tentative Plat in accordance with the drainage report revisions. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Tentative Plat and Drainage Report |
| 06/02/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 2, 2008 Warren D. Thompson Stantec Consulting, Inc. 201 North Bonita Avenue, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: S07-110 Mountain Vail Estates Tentative Plat Dear Warren: Your submittal of April 25, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Fire, Wastewater, Real Estate, Addressing, Zoning, ESD, Engineering, DUPD, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, DUPD, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Phase I ESA (Real Estate, DSD) Per comments from DUPD, written approval is required from OCSD prior to approval of this tentative plat. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 750-7470 |
| 06/02/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee CASE NAME & NUMBER: S07-110, Mountain Vail Estates Submittal #: 4 COMMENTS DUE: 5/22/08 COMMENTS SENT: 6/2/08 Items reviewed: Tentative Plat and Landscape Plan Related: rezoning - C9-06-15/16 land use plan(s) – Houghton Area Master Plan Parks and Recreation Department staff has reviewed this proposal, and finds it NOT APPROVED. Please address the following comments, and resubmit the tentative plat and landscape plan. GENERAL COMMENTS Esmond Station Rail Line Corridor Esmond Station Rail Line Trail Corridor. Please provide a minimum 50-foot-wide public trail corridor along the Esmond-Station historic rail line. The corridor shall include a 12-foot paved, asphalt, bi-directional trail; 2-foot clear zones on each side of the trail, for safety purposes; 12-foot landscaped areas on each side of the trail, outside the 2-foot clear areas; and a 10-foot corridor for the rail bed alignment. Revise tentative plat (TP) keynote 17 accordingly, and remove the words “to be built with the grading plans.” Show a typical trail corridor section on both the TP and landscape plan (LP). Trail Design. All trails are to be designed such that drainage flow shall not interfere with the use of the trails. Trails shall be constructed with slight crowns if possible, and shall direct runoff into adjacent landscaped areas. A swale cross-section is not acceptable. Drainage shall be diverted away from all trails, or, if necessary, structures shall be designed to convey flow under and then away from the trails. All asphalt trails shall have thickened edges. Revise detail 2 on sheet 6 of the TP. Landscaping. Landscaping along both sides of the trail shall include canopy trees and shrubs. Trees shall be at least 6 feet from the edge of the paved path. Revise detail 2 on sheet 6 of the TP, and revise the landscape plan (LP) to show landscaping along the trail corridor. Esmond Station Rail Bed. Identify the location of the rail bed on the TP. Mountain Vail Estates S07-110 Preservation of Historic Rail Bed. If feasible, based on the results of an environmental site analysis (ESA) to be performed by the owner/developer, the historical Esmond-Station rail bed shall be preserved in place to the greatest extent reasonably practicable. The TP cannot be approved until it has been determined whether the rail bed will be preserved. If the rail bed will be preserved in place, add the following notes to the TP and LP: “Prior to any onsite grading, grubbing or construction, all rail bed areas that will be preserved in place shall be protected by temporary fencing. Protected rail bed areas shall be preserved in a natural state, and temporary fencing shall remain in place during all phases of construction.” “On-site monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, and construction relative to rail bed preservation and protection shall be provided during the project construction, at the expense of the developer. The monitoring shall be performed by an individual knowledgeable in all aspects of site grading and construction. The monitor shall provide periodic progress reports to the developer, identifying work accomplished and problems encountered relative to preservation of the rail bed. As work proceeds, copies of these reports shall be provided in a timely manner to the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department and the Department of Urban Planning and Design.” Interpretive Feature. The owner/developer shall provide at least one interpretive display at a prominent location along the historical rail line corridor. The location of the display shall be shown on the TP. Please place the following General Note on the TP: “The owner/developer shall provide an interpretive display along the Esmond Station rail line corridor. Prior to construction, details of the display shall be approved by the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, and the City of Tucson Historic Preservation Officer. “ Esmond Station Public Trail Corridor. The public trail corridor area must be clearly shown on the TP. It is acceptable to dedicate the trail corridor as a public, non-motorized trail easement. The corridor will be maintained by the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department. Please remove the common area designation. Please place the following General Note on the TP: “The wording of the public, non-motorized trail easement along the Esmond Station rail line corridor must be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department prior to final plat approval.” Mountain Vail Estates S07-110 Release of Occupancy Permits. Please place the following General Note on the TP: “The owner/developer shall construct the trail corridor improvements along the Esmond Station rail line, including the interpretative feature, and these improvements shall be inspected and accepted by the City of Tucson, prior to the release of any occupancy permits for any dwellings.” Other Comments Details on Other Plans. Please remove all references to details to be shown on other plans, such as grading plans, improvement plans, architectural plans, etc. Information requested must be shown on the TP, and in some cases the LP. Trail Easement around Site Perimeter. Please add a General Note that says, “A 10-foot-wide, non-motorized public trail easement is being provided around portions of the site perimeter. It is intended to be half of a future 20-foot-wide, public, non-motorized trail corridor. The remaining 10 feet are to be dedicated for public use when adjacent areas are platted or otherwise developed. The purpose of the corridor is to provide future connectivity opportunities for pedestrians, bicyclists and other non-motorized uses.” 8-Foot –Wide Meandering Pathways. All 8-foot pathways adjacent to public streets that do not have a sidewalk on that side of the street must be constructed of concrete or asphalt. Other 8-foot pathways that are not in place of a sidewalk may be constructed of stabilized DG. The construction material of each pathway (i.e., concrete, asphalt or DG) must be indicated on the TP and LP. Drainage shall be diverted away from all pathways, or, if necessary, structures shall be designed to convey flow under and away from the pathways. Recreational Elements. Please remove keynote 23. The location and type of each recreational improvement must be shown on the TP. Details Detail 14 on sheet 7 shows an 8-foot meandering pathway on the edge of the 51-foot ROW, yet the pathway shown on sheet 21 is well outside the ROW. Please clarify. Also, delete the portion of the detail note that says, “… built with the park facility.” Please add the 10-foot non-motorized public trail easement to sections 16 and 17 on sheet 7 of 32. Also, please remove the part of detail 17 that says, “see grading plans for locations.” Mountain Vail Estates S07-110 Provide the trail construction information on detail 13 on sheet 10. Remove the words “see architects plans”. Please call out the 8-foot-wide meandering pathway on both sides of the street, for detail 1 on sheet 14. Provide construction information for the pathway. Part A (North of Mary Ann Cleveland Way) Recreation Area. As per the preliminary development plan, please provide a recreation area along the north side of the Atterbury Wash, in the vicinity of lots 17-20, and show it on the TP and LP. The recreation area is to provide accessible, non-motorized connectivity to the Atterbury Wash. Blanket Public, Non-Motorized Trail Easement, Atterbury Wash. As agreed to at the March 20, 2008 meeting with City staff from several departments and the developers’ representatives, please provide a blanket public, non-motorized trail easement across the Common Area associated with the Atterbury Wash, on sheets 17, 18 (and 28 – south of Mary Ann Cleveland Way) of 32. One way to do this is to create a separate Common Area just for that area, with the blanket easement attached. The final plat must show this information. Parts B and C – South of and adjacent to Mary Ann Cleveland Way (includes large park area at northwest end of rail corridor) Parking for Park. Parking in accordance with LUC requirements must be provided onsite. We discussed providing parking along the adjacent street frontages. Please provide parking calculations for the large park on the TP, including required and provided parking spaces. Identify on the TP where the parking is provided. Deletion of Recreation Areas Acceptable. Two recreation areas on the rezoning PDP are not shown on the plat. One is located at the southwest corner or Mary Ann Cleveland Way and Atterbury Wash Way; the other is east of the intersection of Chevrolet Avenue and Atterbury Wash Way. Because both are unlikely to attract much use as neighborhood pocket park areas, due to their location, it is acceptable to delete them. Atterbury Wash Dedication. See comment #7 above, regarding the blanket public, non-motorized access easement. Mountain Vail Estates S07-110 Parts D and E (southwest portion of project) Provide vehicular access, for maintenance and emergency (not necessarily fire engine) vehicles, from Crowley Brothers Drive to the southern-most Common Area B. Provide removable bollards to block general vehicular access. Provide pedestrian and vehicular access (for maintenance and emergency purposes but not necessarily fire engines) from Crowley Brothers Drive to Common Area B in the vicinity of lots 243-246. Provide removable bollards to block general vehicular access. Provide non-motorized pedestrian access from Desert Fauna Loop to Common Area B, in the vicinity of lots 231-237. Parts F and G, southeast portion of Mountain Vail Estates Preservation of Rail Bed. If it is determined that the rail bed is to be preserved, please pull back lots 393-401 ten feet, to allow installation of the retaining wall and preservation of the rail bed. Perimeter Trail Easements and/or Connections. On sheets 31 & 32, please clarify whether it is intended to show a 10-foot or 20-foot non-motorized public trail easement (south of lot 418). Please clarify if the easement extends across the entire southern edge of the property on sheets 31 & 32. Add this easement to section 16 on sheet 7. Pedestrian Connectivity. On sheet 31, please demonstrate pedestrian connectivity between the end of the spur trail along the western edge of CA B-10 and the sidewalk along Granite Gulch Way near lot 409. Atterbury Wash, Blanket Public Trail Easement. On sheet 28/32, please clarify that a blanket public, non-motorized trail easement is being provided across the area northeast of the toe-of-slope behind lots 333-345. REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 6/2/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsS07-110a_Mtn_Vail_Estates.doc |
| 06/02/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S07-110 Mountain Vail Estates 05/29/08 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-16 – Weinberg – MaryAnn Cleveland Way NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: H.A.M.P. SCENIC ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: May 22, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Conditional Approval. Resubmittal NOT Required if DSD staff can check for comments as stated below. REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: May 29, 2008 Department of Urban Planning and Design S07-110 Mountain Vail Estates Tentative Plat May 21, 2008 Staff offers the following comments: Please provide approval from the City of Tucson Department of Development Services, Building Codes Division stating that “stabilized decomposed granite” meets Section 302.1, of the ADA requirements, or revise the tentative plat and landscape plan to meet Section 302. ADA requirements, as it relates to pedestrian paths located within/around basins to location of passive recreational amenities. David Witt is a contact person with the City of Tucson, Development Services, Building Codes Division to further discuss information on ADA requirements. An all-weather pedestrian circulation system is appropriate throughout the residential development, including pedestrian paths located within/around basins to passive recreational amenities. As per applicant’s response to staff’s previous comment # 6 (dated February 22, 2008), staff will conditionally approve subject to approval by Arizona Fish and Game, as it relates to Tortoise habitat issues, or a written/e-mail approval is received by staff from the Office of Conservation and Sustainability stating this issue has been resolved. |