Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-021
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/16/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/19/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S03-021 CIVANO II / REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: March 18, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. On Final Plat 1: Label Courtland Drive on pg. 7. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 03/22/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | The Tentative Plat is approved with the condition that Courtland Ave. will be designed per Street Section "D", as indicated on Sheet 8, and not as indicated on Sheets 4 and 5 of the Tentative Plat. |
| 03/25/2004 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Civano II S03-021, T15S, R15E, SECTION 12 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on March 16, 2004 The subject submittal has been reviewed. We offer the following comments: Drainage Report: 1. Provide the HEC-RAS cross-sections plots. 2. Address drainage facilities maintenance responsibility and provide a maintenance checklist. Appendix 8.2 was not included in the Drainage Report. Tentative Plat: 1. The Tentative Plat can not be approved as submitted until the requested DSMR's are approved and the approval is noted on the Tentative Plat. 2. The scupper at D20 in detail S/10 does not match the recommendation of the drainage report. Revise. 3. Basin 2A grate elevation does not appear to match the elevation in the drainage report. He Drainage Report shows the Rim Elevation at 93.55', the Tentative Plat shows the elevation at 93.83'. Revise. 4. The 18" RCP slope at Basin 2A is different from the drainage report recommendation. The Drainage Report shows a 1% slope, the Tentative Plat shows 0.30% slope. Revise 5. The Q100 (out) for basins 1 and 2B do not match the information in the drainage report. The Drainage Report shows Q100 (out) is 3 cfs, the Tentative Plat shows Q100 (out) at 19.09 cfs. Revise. Landscape Plan: Show the water harvesting areas on the Landscape Plan. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report |
| 03/25/2004 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: CIVANO II Lots 1-237 S03-021 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the City of Tucson tentative plat submitted for review dated March 15, 2004. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing facilities along Bilby Road then proceeding through the interior of the subdivision. TEP will provide an electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within twenty two (22) working days after receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for design completion are: building plans including water, electrical load, paving and driveway placement. at the customer's request, a design can be provided prior to the Approved Tentative Plat, however, once a design is provided, any design changes will be billable to the developer. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 03/31/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the native plant preservation plan to include the grading limits along the western portion of the property and adjacent to the scenic route buffer area which is to remain in a natural, undisturbed state. DS 2-15.3.4.A.1, LUC 2.8.2.4.A Required preservation fencing will be located based on the grading limits. Include limits for development adjacent to or within Block 1 also. 2) Revise the native plant preservation plan to comply with the condition of rezoning which requires that "existing significant mature vegetation along the basins perimeter shall be preserved" C9-91-14 Show existing vegetation to be preserved on the landscape plan. 3) This development is subject to the provisions of the scenic corridor zone. A separate review and approval is required. TCC 23A-42 4) Within the Scenic Route buffer area and the MS&R right-of-way, all areas between the MS&R right-of-way line and the existing street right-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be revegetated with native vegetation per LUC 3.7.5.2.D.1. Revise the landscape plan to include revegetation for disturbed portions of the Houghton Road right of way. A native seed mix which includes only vegetation native to the site is required for disturbed portions of the site and adjacent right of way areas. 5) Submittal of master grading and open space plans including undisturbed natural areas as shown in the environmental resource report submitted by the rezoning applicant is required. Open space and grading shall conform to Exhibits 5 & 6 in the Civano Development Plan C9-91-14 6) Provide open space calculations for this phase in order to demonstrate compliance with the Civano Master Development Plan open space estimates. 7) The Civano Master Development Plan includes minimum screening guidelines (p. 14) which include use of site found rock for any walls, to the extent possible and finishes that blend with the natural soil and plant materials. Revise the plans as necessary to comply with the guidelines. Walls are also subject to additional conditions of rezoning case C9-91-14. 8) Development in proximity to the Mesquite Ranch Wash is subject to the provisions of TCC Chapter 29, Article VIII. Submit a Plant/Habitat Inventory and a mitigation plan for any proposed disturbance within the study area. 9) Revise the native plant preservation plan sheet numbering or the sheet index drawing and matchlines to correspond. Revise sheet 26 as necessary. Submit sheet 13. 10) Revise the title blocks for sheets 21-25. 11) Revise the summary calculations for Acacia greggii on native plant preservation plan sheet 2. DS 2-15.3.4.B 12) Approval from the City Engineer is required for the landscaping proposed along Bilby Road. LUC 3.7.2.9 The landscape plans should show the landscape materials planted behind the sidewalk area. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. IN ADDITION A PLANT/HABITAT INVENTORY AND MITIGATION PLAN MAY BE REQUIRED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE WASH ORDINANCE. |
| 03/31/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this T.P. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/01/2004 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St.Paul FOR: Patricia Gehlen Planning Technician Principal Planner PROJECT: S03-021 Civano II Pulte Home: 2nd Review TRANSMITTAL: April 1, 2004 DUE DATE: March 29, 2004 COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is January 10 2005. 2. There is an additional six inches (6") of right-of-way required between the sidewalk and the property line of the adjacent property. Please provide this requirement for all the public streets and demonstrate compliance on Details C, D and E on Sheet 8. DS 3-01 Figure #2 3. The minimum width for a parking lane with a two foot (2') wedge curb is eight feet (8') including the wedge curb. Details C and E on Sheet 8 depict parking lanes with a width of seven feet (7'). Please revise the width of the parking lanes to eight feet (8') with ten-foot (10') travel lanes. DS 3-01.2.4.A & B DS 3-01 Figure #2 4. Common Area B, Private Driveway Access must meet minimum street standards. Please revise Detail G, Sheet #8, Detail Q, Sheet #9 and Key Note #39. DS 3-01 Figure #1 5. The lot typicals in the lower right corner of Sheet 9 identify the "face of carport / garage" as being measured to the travel lane. The face of a garage or carport is the minimum of nineteen to the back of sidewalk. The face of the structure, except where the driveway is located, is measured as the greater of twenty-one feet (21') or the height from the travel lane. Please correct the typicals. LUC Sec 3.2.6.5.B.2.a 6. There is a conflict between Details D, Sheet 8 and D1, Sheet 8 for the Pathway dimension. The Pathway is dimensioned as eight feet (8') in Detail D and ten (10') in Detail D1. Please resolve the conflict. The minimum width for a pathway with two-way bicycle travel is ten feet (10'). DS 3-01.2.6.A & C 7. Please provide the actual colors approved for the SCZ along with the manufacturers' paint numbers in the Scenic Corridor Case Requirements box on Sheet 11. Also fill in the date of approval. 8. Please coordinate all revisions to and within the Tentative Plat and the Landscape Plans. Demonstrate compliance with all the review comments made by the Planning Task Force. 9. Please provide the DSMR case number, date of approval, modifications approved and conditions imposed in General Note #38. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St.Paul, (520) 791-5608 x1184. |
| 04/02/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: April 01, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project S03-021 Civano II: Resubmittal - TP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the development plan and has the following comments: The cross-section for the Houghton Greenway is non-conforming to the City/County divided urban pathway standard(attached). Maintain a minimum 6 ft to 8 ft wide landscape buffer between the drainage and the paved path. Maintain a minimum 6 ft to 8 ft wide landscape buffer between the paved path and the meandering trail. Native trees spaced a maximum of 30 ft apart should be planted on both sides of the paved path and trail. The trail along Mesquite Ranch Wash is unecessarily wide(15 ft). The City/County standard trail width is 8 ft. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 04/02/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S03-021 Civano II 04/02/04 (ü) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-91-14, S97-035 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Revised Civano Master Plan, MOU, and Impact Systems Standards GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Houghton Road (Scenic Route) COMMENTS DUE BY: March 29, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (ü) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (ü) Resubmittal Required: (ü) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER:K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: March 22, 2004 1. Per previous meeting, pedestrian bollards were to be placed at entrances to the attached units to prevent vehicles from entering. Please place four (4) additional bollards, one (1) on either side of the designated path, at the pedestrian entrances that extend from Street "D" to Street "H", using the same type of light bollards as the other paths. 2. Please provide the totals that correspond to the blanks left in comment 46 prior to the approval of the tentative plat. This may be verified by Development Services, Zoning Review Section prior to approval. 3. Please correct residential street detail "D". Total for the right-of-way width should be fifty-two (52) feet instead of fifty-one (51) feet, and the half right-of-way should be twenty-six (26) feet instead of twenty-five and one half (25 ½) feet. 4. Per previous meeting maneuvering ability needs to be demonstrated for vehicles entering the rear loading garages off from the motor courts. Please provide a detail showing the turning radius required and the turning radius provided. Garage door width should also be noted as this aids in meeting this request in determining if a vehicle will have adequate space to exit and enter the garage. |