Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S03-014
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/20/2003 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 August 19, 2003 TO: Anthony Tsang, A. C. Tsang Engineering Group, LLC THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Desert Vista, Lots 1-31 and Common Area A Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal S03-014 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. This project will be tributary to the the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is no available treatment capacity for this project at the Roger Road Facility under the current existing conditions (actual development and commitments for service through approved Sewer Service Agreements). PCWWM is currently exploring possibilities that may allow more sewage to transferred from Roger Road to the Ina Road Pollution Control Facility. The Ina Road Facility is expected to have the necessary treatment capacity to accommodate this project, upon completion of the 12 mgd upgrade now under construction. However, a treatment plant interconnect may need to be designed, funded, and constructed before adequate treatment capacity becomes available for this project. PCWWM Planning Services will need to inform the Development Review Division in writing that treatment capacity is available, before we can approve this project connecting to Pima County’s public sewer system. Please direct all inquiries about this item to Mr. Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services Manager at 520-740-6625. The following comments assume that treatment capacity will be available for this project in the near future. 2. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream wastewater conveyance system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 3. Based on the preliminary sewer layout as shown on the referenced tentative plat, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. However, a final determination of this status cannot be made until approval of the sewer construction plans and/or preparation of the sewer service agreement. 4. Add the subdivision plat case number, S03-014, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. 5. Sheet 1: Please show the plan number (G-70-027) for the existing sewer line in Elvira Road that is shown on PCWWM’s basemaps. 6. Sheet 2: Delete General Note 25. General Note 13 communicates the same message. 7. Subject to the above, the tentative plat is hereby approved. The required revision may be shown on the Mylars. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 09/02/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: Desert Vista S03-014 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: September 2, 2003 DUE DATE: September 2, 2003 The Zoning Review Section at Development Services verifies that the tentative plat meets the requirements of the Land Use Code, subject to the following changes. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the approval is void, and we request copies of the corrected tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. The minimum required setback for carports and garages is 18 from property line, 19 feet from back of sidewalk. Revise lot typical for Missiondale Road (for lot coverage calculation) to show compliance with carport/garage setbacks. Also, the street setback for all lots (developing area setback) is the greater of 21 feet or building height from edge of nearest travel lane, which is at the edge of parking lane (6 feet out into the street from streetside edge of the proposed wedge curbs). Please revise setbacks for typical showing lots fronting on Missiondale Road. LUC 3.2.6.5.B.2.a.1 DS 2-03.2.4.M Should the CDRC recommend approval of the tentative plat, please have the applicant submit sign-off copies for approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 09/02/2003 | FRODRIG2 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Desert Vista Tentative Plat 2nd Submittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S03-014 SUMMARY: The revised Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan, and Drainage Addendum were received by Engineering. Some of the comments were not completely addressed. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.2-03.2.3.I: On page 1 of Drainage Report, it is stated that no special watercourses are located near the site. Please discuss in the report, the south channel located adjacent to the south project boundary and whether it holds the 100-year capacity within the channel. 2) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.5. In the Drainage Report, explain how the drainage design maintains the existing, exiting Q100 from site at basin outlet, in the existing flow pattern conditions. Discuss the flow to the north. If the proposed secondary notch is outside of the project boundaries and no drainage easement is provided, verification is required when any drainage solution occurring outside the boundaries of the plat is constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.) TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 3) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.C: Assure that all lettering on the Tentative Plat sheets is legible; provide all lettering and dimensions equivalent of twelve (0.12) point or greater in size. 4) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.6. Clearly delineate the 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more on the plat for Missiondale Road and onsite developed conditions. Provide linetypes for pre- and post- developed floodplain limits in legend. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: 5) On sheet L3, assure that the location of proposed plants are not placed on vicinity of access ramps for basins. For resubmittal, submit the revised tentative plat, revised drainage report, revised landscape plan. Contact me at 791-5550, extension 2204 if you have questions or would like to set up a meeting to address the above items. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Section Development Services |
| 09/05/2003 | FRODRIG2 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/05/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P.: 1. Show the parking lane for the south half of the roadway in section C-C. 2. Label dimension of SVT's (ie 20x110) D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |