Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S03-014
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
131 W ELVIRA RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S03-014
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/19/2003 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/20/2003 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Tentative Plat is approved 6/20/03.
07/02/2003 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S03-014 DESERT VISTA/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: June 27, 2003



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this Tentative Plat on the condition that suffix for existing street names is spelled on Final Plat.

NOTE: Label approved interior street names on Final Plat.


***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.***
07/02/2003 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
S03-014
DESERT VISTA
07/02/2003 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Case Number: S03-014
Project Name: Desert Vista: Tentative Plat Review
Estimated Traffic Generation: 297 trips

If you have any questions or need more information, please contact me.

********************************************************
Jason Bill
Research/Statistical Analyst
Pima Association of Governments
177 N. Church Ave. #405
Tucson, AZ 85701
phone (520) 792-1093
fax (520) 620-6981
email jbill@pagnet.org
07/11/2003 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: July 11, 2003

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project S03-014 Desert Vista: Tentative Plat Review

CC: Craig Gross, Development Services


Staff has reviewed and has no comments.

Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions.
07/17/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner

PROJECT:
Desert Vista
S03-014
Tentative Plat

TRANSMITTAL: July 16, 2003
DUE DATE: July 16, 2003


1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before June 18, 2004.
LUC 4.1.7.1

2. Please place the S03-014 number in or near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans.
DS 2-03.2.2.B.1

3. Revise the existing zoning to the west of the site to read "R-1" rather than "R-2".
DS 2-03.2.3.I

4. Add the Tucson City Limits line to the project location map, along the south section line of Sec 13, T 15 S, R 13 E.
DS 2-03.2.1.D.4

5. Provide recordation information for all easements on the plat, or state that proposed easements are "by final plat".
DS 2-03.2.3.C
DS 2-03.2.4.J
6. Revise the square footages for all lots to be correct and add the square footage for the common area. Lots 1, 9, 10, 18 and 19 do not appear to meet the minimum 5,000 square foot size requirement for R-2 zoning because of the corner spandrels.
DS 2-03.2.4.A, .B, & .I

7. Show existing sight visibility triangles at the intersection of Elvira Road and Missiondale Road and at the intersection of the proposed public street with both Elvira Road and Missiondale Road.
DS 2-03.2.4.M

8. Provide a parking calculation on the plat showing that there are a minimum of two vehicle spaces provided for each dwelling unit, plus visitor parking provided at a ratio of one space per unit. Dimension the visitor parking spaces, which must be provided on both sides of the proposed new public street. The visitor parking spaces must be evenly distributed and available on both sides of the street, within 150 feet of all lots within the subdivision. The cross street cross-sections do not allow for parking on both sides of the street. Please revise per new Development Standard DS 3-01.2.4.D. Indicate if parking is allowed along Missiondale Road and Elvira Road. Provide written documentation from Traffic Engineering which states that on-street parking is permitted along Missiondale Road.
DS 3-05.2.4.A.6
DS 2-03.2.4.G
DS 3-05.2.4.A.1
DS 3-01.2.4.D

9. Sidewalks are required to be 5 feet in width along the entire length of street frontage, whether public or private. Please revise sidewalk widths on the drawing and the cross sections to meet the new Development Standard, DS 3-01.3.3.A and DS 3-01.4.1.A.1. Note, however, that per new Development Standard DS 3-01.3.3.B.1, sidewalks may be located as little as two feet from the back of the wedge curb. DS 3-01.3.3.A
DS 3-01.3.3.B.1



10. Wedge curbing may only be used on streets of 1000 ADT or less. Missiondale Road may have an ADT of greater than 1,000. Please revise or provide documentation demonstrating that Missiondale Road south of Elvira Road has an ADT of 1,000 or less. DS 3-01.3.2.B.3





11. General note 10 states that duplexes will be constructed on lots 29 through 31. These lots do not meet the minimum sizes for duplexes in the R-2 zone. Based on development designator "K", the maximum allowed density is 15 units per acre, which calculates to a required minimum 5,808 square feet to allow a duplex on an R-2-zoned lot. Lots 29 through 31 have only 5,600 square feet (Actually Lot 31 has less due to spandrel at intersection). Please revise. LUC 3.2.3.1.C








12. Provide lot dimensions for all lots. Only some of the lot dimensions are provided.
DS 2-03.2.4.A
13. Remove general note 8 as it is a final plat note.


14. Provide a residential density calculation for the subdivision stating the number of units per acre proposed.
LUC 3.2.10


15. The minimum required setback for carports and garages is 19 feet from back of sidewalk. Please revise lot typicals. The lot typical also must be revised as follows: 1) the perimeter yard setbacks should read "the greater of 6 feet or 2/3 height of structure for the R-2 lots proposed with single family residences". 2) The lot typicals do not apply to lots where duplexes are proposed. For duplex lots, provide another lot typical, which shows required perimeter yard building setbacks to be the greater of 10 feet or ¾ height of structure, 3) provide another lot typical for those lots fronting on Missiondale Road, where the sidewalks are in the public right of way. The street setback for all lots (developing area setback) is the greater of 21 feet or building height from edge of nearest travel lane.
LUC 3.2.6.5.B.2.a
DS 2-03.2.4.M
LUC 3.2.6.4
LUC 3.2.6.5




16. Clearly delineate the common area in a surveyable manner (with dimensions and bearings). Provide the square footages for the common area.
DS 2-03.2.4.C
DS 2-03.2.4.I
DS 2-03.2.4.A
17. Add general note which states the applicable development designators are "I" and "K". Also, add a note detailing the "subject to" restrictions for the residential use in the R-2 zone (subject to LUC 3.5.7.1.F). Also, provide the maximum proposed building height in the general notes. Setbacks cannot be verified until building heights are specified.
LUC 2.3.5.2.A.2
18. CC&R's must be provided for review and approval prior to approval of final plat. DS 2-03.6.6


19. All requested revisions must be made to tentative plat, landscape & NPPO plans. DS 2-07.2.1.A


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
07/18/2003 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Needs Review
07/18/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Revise the plant preservation schedule on sheet L1 to correct the disposition for PV 26 and PV 27.

2) The plant preservation schedule on sheet L-1 and the landscape plan appear to indicate that only 13 viable protected plants are proposed for preservation. Revise the Plant Preservation/Mitigation Totals table on sheet L-1 to correspond with the other plan information.

3) The retention basin should include additional plantings including shrubs and groundcover plants per DS 10-01.4.3.2.
07/18/2003 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S03-014 Desert Vista

(X) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE:

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12th Ave-Valencia Rd. Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No

COMMENTS DUE BY: 7/16/03

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

(X) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 7/16/03
07/18/2003 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

RICK LYONS
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: July 14, 2003


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S03-014 Desert Vista T151313 (138-21)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat.
Add the square footage for the lots and Common Area “A”.
Add the bearings and dimensions for the lots and the street centerline.
Add the complete curve data
Add the section, township and range to the title blocks.
Add the road information for Missiondale and Elvira roads.
Remove the stippling.
Add the bearing and dimension from the section tie to the point of tie on the subdivision.
If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.




Susan C. King
07/18/2003 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this T.P.

1. Depict and show dimensions of SVT's.
2. Indicate number of parking lanes for sections A-A and C-C. If there are to be no parking lanes, show no parking sign in the sections and proposed locations in the plan view.
3. Add a general note to read: "All non-signalized intersection street names must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways."

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us
07/22/2003 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved no objection
07/23/2003 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Desert Vista Tentative Plat Engineering Review
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S03-014
SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan, title report, and Drainage Report were received by Engineering. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only.

DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS:
1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.3-01.4.4.B: The maximum allowable street flow should not exceed 50 cfs. Revise drainage scheme to contain over 120 cfs in the proposed south subdivision roadway with a stormdrain system or other acceptable drainage infrastructure design. Clarify cross sections and provide spot elevations in plan view showing how flows are kept at 50 cfs or less.
2) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.I: On page 1 of Drainage Report, it is stated that no special watercourses are located near the site. Please discuss in the report, the south channel located adjacent to the south project boundary and whether it holds the 100-year capacity within the channel.
3) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.5. In the Drainage Report, explain how the drainage design maintains the existing, exiting Q100 from site at basin outlet. In the Drainage Report, the Offsite Watershed Map indicates increased offsite discharges. Verification is required when any drainage solution occurring outside the boundaries of the plat is constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.)
4) DS Sec.10-01.3.6.2: In Drainage Report, it is stated that a 42-inch security fence around the basin will not be required, however, a 5-foot patio wall is called out on the "BASIN A DIMENSION" detail on sheet 2 of the Tentative Plat. Revise discussion on page 11 of the report regarding the need for a security barrier if depths exceed 2 feet and the basin side slopes are steeper than 4:1(H:V).
5) Clarify the following in the Drainage Report:
a) As mentioned on page 8 of Drainage Report, show section locations for sections 1, 2, and 3 on Drainage Report;
b) Label locations for street sections, from pages 31-38 of Drainage Report, on a plan view;
c) Regarding page 46 of Drainage Report, provide map of infiltration test locations;
d) A final copy of the revised Drainage Report will need to be submitted with the administrative address on the cover (for archiving purposes).
6) A floodplain use permit application shall be submitted at time of grading plan review.

TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS:
7) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.C: Assure that the lettering is legible and provide all lettering and dimensions equivalent of twelve (0.12) point or greater in size.
8) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.D.2: Identify major streets (Missiondale and Elvira) on location map.
9) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.G.1: In title block, spell out word subdivision in the title block reference to VALENCIA "SUBDIVISION".
10) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.J: Use plan feature symbols as depicted in the Standard Details for Public Improvements ('94 edition) Standard Detail Index. (i.e. lot corners, survey monuments, etc.)
11) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.C.2.b: Add a general note to sheet 2, "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required for the following lots: 1-10 and 28-31."
12) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.E: Use exact wording for General Note 5: "ANY RELOCATION OR MODIFICATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS NECESSITATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE PUBLIC."
13) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: As a standard comment, all existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status.
14) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: On sheet 2, clarify existing and proposed right-of-way dimensions for Missiondale Road detail "SECTION BB".
15) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.E: As a standard comment, the following information regarding existing utilities will be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, and storm and sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Show sewer line invert elevations.
16) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.A: Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. Clarify whether south boundary bearing is measured or recorded.
17) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: On sheet 2, revise Section AA to conform to DS Sec.3-01.10.Figure 3.
18) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.I: Provide dimensions and approximate area in square footage for the "COMMON AREA A - RETENTION/ DETENTION BASIN".
19) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.1: On sheet 1, depict 100-year ponding limits and water surface elevation in basin.
20) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Provide typical plan view drainage detail(s) showing high point and minimum slope grades for drainage around building pad.
21) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.6. The 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more will be drawn on the plat for Missiondale Road and onsite developed conditions.
22) IBC Chapter 36, Section 9: A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal.
23) Proposed project is subject to the new NPDES requirements for NOI and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans. Contact Loren Makus, 791-4251 for submittal requirements at grading plan review stage.

LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS:
24) On sheet L3, assure that no proposed plants are blocking or placed on access ramps for basins.
25) Show sight visibility triangles for existing and proposed conditions. Provide notation for restriction of existing or proposed structures within 30" to 72" in height within the sight visibility triangles.

A meeting must be scheduled to go over these comments prior to resubmittal. For resubmittal, submit the revised tentative plat, revised drainage report, revised landscape plan, and $500 drainage review fees. Contact me at 791-5550, extension 2204 to set up a meeting to address the above items.

Elizabeth Eberbach, PE
Civil Engineer
Engineering Section
Development Services
07/24/2003 GLYNDA ROTHWELL UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved WR#108616 July 23, 2003



Mr. Antony C. Tsang
4626 E. Fort Lowell, Suite S
Tucson, Arizona 85712

Dear Mr. Tsang:

SUBJECT: Desert Vista
Lots 1-31
S03-014

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the Tentative Plat submitted for review dated June 8, 2003. A copy of the plat with the approximate location of the existing facilities is enclosed. In all probability, the electrical feed for this subdivision will come from Unit 13 or 14, as shown on the enclosed map.

TEP will provide an electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. A complete set of building plans, including water, electrical, sidewalk, and paving plans, will be required prior to the design being created.

Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 884-3879.

Sincerely,



S. Glynda Mastrangelo
Right-of-Way Agent
Land Management

sgm
cc: Craig Gross, City of Tucson
Mike Aboud