Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S02-036
Review Name: CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2002 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | INITIALIZE THE WORKFLOW | Completed | |
| 08/16/2002 | JIM EGAN | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | FIRE | Approved | THE TENTATIVE PLAT IS APPROVED. |
| 08/22/2002 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | COMMENTS ON FILE |
| 08/26/2002 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S02-036 JOHN A EVANS & ASSOCIATES, INC COPPER VISTA: |
| 08/26/2002 | CDRC Review Process | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S02-036 Copper Vista 08/23/02 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: None NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: September 5, 2002 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (X) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: REVIEWER: msp DATE: August 22, 2002 |
| 08/26/2002 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Telephone: 520-884-3879 Fax: 520-770-2002 WR#92964 August 26, 2002 Mr. John A. Evans, PE John A. Evans & Associates, Inc. 9180 E. Placita Senna Tucson, AZ 85749 Dear Mr. Evans: SUBJECT: Copper Vista Lots 1-29 & Common Area “A” S02-036 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the Tentative Plat submitted for review dated August, 2002. The feed into this subdivision will possibly come from the overhead three-phase primary line located on the west side of the development in road right-of-way. TEP will provide an electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. at the customer’s request, a design can be provided prior to the Approved Tentative Plat, however, once a design is provided, any design changes will be billable to the developer. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 884-3879. Sincerely, S. Glynda Rothwell Right-of-Way Agent Land Management sgr cc: Craig Gross, City of Tucson |
| 09/03/2002 | JIM TATE | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ENGINEERING | Denied | SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Copper Vista Tentative Plat. The activity number is S02-036. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on August 15, 2002. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: TP, DR, LP The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. The next submittal should address the following items: TENTATIVE PLAT 1. Please include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. 2. Please include a copy of the CC&R's with the Final Plat submittal. The maintenance notes outlined in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included on the Final Plat or in the CC&R's. 3. A Grading Plan and permit will be required. 4. The Township, Range, and Section on the Location map are incorrect. 5. Include the subdivision case number (S02-036) on the plat. 6. Show Benchmark location, the proposed location of and method of tie to permanent survey monuments or to the nearest section or quarter section corner, and the proposed location and type of subdivision control monuments. All monuments found or set must be described. 7. The sight visibility triangles (svts) shown on the plat are incorrect. Remove the svts shown on adjacent properties. The only svts required to be shown are those on the property to be developed. The svt lengths are incorrect. All streets are local and the near side dimension is 180 ft. The far side dimension is 110 ft. There are a total of eight svts to be shown. See DS 3-01 figures 16 &17 for the proper placement of svts. 8. Show the 100-yr. basin ponding limits. The scupper inlet is lower than the 100-yr. WSEL. Ponding will occur in the roadway. DS 2-03.2.4.L.1 9. Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). DS 2-03.2.3.F 10. Provide proposed ground elevation at different points on each lot for reference to future grading and site drainage. DS 2-03.2.4.L.4 See IBC chapter 36 Section 13.1 for proposed fills in excess of 2 ft. within 100 ft. of adjacent residentially zoned areas. 11. Provide a basin maintenance access ramp. Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.4 DRAINAGE REPORT 1. The inflow hydrographs for Q-2, Q-5, and Q100 do not match those on the routing sheets. The data appears to be one minute off. The Q-10 hydrograph values do not match those on the routing sheet at all. 2. Show that none of the 64 cfs of flow on Stewart will enter Copper Vista Dr. Show that none of the 127 cfs of flow on Randall will enter Copper Vista Dr. LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. The svt's on the Landscape Plan must match those on the Tentative Plat. See comment 7 above. James C. Tate, P.E. Senior Engineering Associate |
| 09/03/2002 | JIM TATE | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ENGINEERING | Denied | DATE: November 12, 2002 TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator FROM: Engineering SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Copper Vista Tentative Plat. The activity number is S02-036. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on November 7, 2002. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat. Engineering approves the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: TP APPROVAL: DRAINAGE REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 2. Please include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. 3. Please include a copy of the CC&R's with the Final Plat submittal. The maintenance notes outlined in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included on the Final Plat or in the CC&R's. 4. A Grading Plan and permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. The next submittal must address the following items: TENTATIVE PLAT 1. Provide proposed ground elevation at different points on each lot for reference to future grading and site drainage. DS 2-03.2.4.L.4 In lieu of showing several elevations on each lot, show a typical front drainage detail ("A" lot) and rear drainage detail ("B" lot). and label each lot on the plan as "A" or "B". 2. Provide a basin maintenance access ramp. A minimum of one 15 ft. wide vehicular access ramp must be provided into each basin. The maximum access ramp slope must not exceed 15 % (6.67:1). The proposed basin has slopes of 4:1. Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.4 James C. Tate, P.E. Civil Engineer |
| 09/03/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | LANDSCAPE | Approved | |
| 09/04/2002 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ed Abrigo, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: September 3, 2002 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S02-036 Copper Vista T151407 (140-25) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. The location map has the wrong section and range (S14-T15S-R13E, should be S07-T15S-R14E). Please remove hatching. Add the bearings for the lot lines, the dimension and bearing for the street centerline and the complete curve data. Add road information for Alvord Road, Stewart Boulevard and Randall Boulevard. Add the section tie. Add Bloodworth/Stewart Park 56/05 M&P as an adjacent subdivision. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan C. King |
| 09/06/2002 | CDRC Review Process | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ZONING | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is August 14, 2002. 2. Please correct the township, range, and section noted in the location map on sheet 1 of 3. D.S. 2-03.2.1.D.3 3. This project has been assigned subdivision case number (S02-036). Note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1 4. Under general note three (3), list the applicable ("subject to" section 3.5.7.1.F). In addition, please note the manufactured housing requirements as they are listed under L.U.C. 3.5.7.1.F on the plat. 5. All existing and proposed easements on this site must be shown on the plat, including the type, width, recordation information, and whether they will be private or public. If an easement is to be recorded by final plat, please so state. D.S. 2-03.2.4.J 6. The carport/garage building setback must be a minimum of 18 feet at the closest point to the front street lot line and dimensioned at a right angle. The typical lot detail for a corner lot does not appear to meet the 18-foot carport/garage setback. Provide the carport/garage setback dimension at a right angle from the street lot line for the corner lot typical detail L.U.C. 3.2.6.5.B.2 7. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. 8. All requested revisions must be made to the tentative plat, landscape and NPPO plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 09/12/2002 | CDRC Review Process | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | THE TENTATIVE PLAT IS APPROVED. |
| 09/12/2002 | CDRC Review Process | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No objection |
| 09/16/2002 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | ENGINEERING - TRAFFIC | Approved | DATE: September 12, 2002 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Senior Planner, Parks and Recreation RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project S02-035 Tanque Verde La Rienda CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed and approved. |
| 09/16/2002 | GLENN HICKS | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: September 13, 2002 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Senior Planner, Parks and Recreation RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project S02-036 Copper Vista CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed and approved. |
| 10/03/2002 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 October 2, 2002 TO: John Evans, John A. Evans & Associates THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Copper Vista, Lots 1-29 and Common Area A Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal S02-036 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on the preliminary sewer layout as shown on the referenced tentative plat, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. Add the subdivision plat case number, S02-036, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. 4. It is my understanding that the configuration of the private sewer easements and the slope of 0.33% for the 8" sewer lines was approved during the conceptual phase of this project. 5. Subject to the above, the tentative plat is hereby approved. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 10/10/2002 | CDRC Review Process | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved |