Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0149
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/01/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/01/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | A separate permit is required for the installation of a private sewer collection system with a force main and will require a review of the system design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality as well as a building permit from the City of Tucson. Reference Title 18, R18-9-E302, 4.02 General Permit, Arizona Administrative Code. |
| 07/01/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: North Tucson Commerce Center ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0149 Address: 6690 S Alvernon Way Zoning: I-1 Existing Use: undisturbed Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: Distribution Center TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 23, 2022 DUE DATE: July 8, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. General Note - Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 1. The landscape plans do not match the scope of work shown on the civil drawing. Please remove landscape, NPP and water harvesting plans if the DP is not including building 3 or clearly indicate the scope of work 2. Please screen back the improvements so the aerial is readable on the NPP plan. 3. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 4. There should be additional trees (about 6 or so parking spaces) instead of along the north side of the parking area. All spaces within 40' of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 5. The ERR requires exhibits that show floodplain, riparian area and proposed disturbance, as well as mitigation. Please refer to Tech Standards 4-01.2.5.B for content requirements. 6. Please provide a summary of quantities of total inventoried, mitigation and TOS plants in a manner that makes it simple to cross check between landscape and NPP plans. This can be an added row on the Native Plant Preservation Worksheet. Additionally, sort the inventory list by species and add a total. 7. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized. It appears that a lot of water from impervious surfaces are being directed to the basins rather than the landscape areas. UDC Technical Standards Manual - Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. 8. The below comments are directed to the engineer's drainage solution. The grading plan and water harvesting plan must meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation, nor do the grading plans match the water harvesting plans. a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible. b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas. c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas. d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. e. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. f. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. 9. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. Add flow arrows showing how water is draining to landscape areas. 11. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/01/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Passed | Email from: Nicholas Jordan <Nicholas.Jordan@pima.gov> on behalf of Addressing <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Thu 6/23/2022 5:02 PM Pima County Addressing does not need to be part of this review. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
| 07/01/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA COUNTY - REGIONAL FLOOD CTRL DIST | Reqs Change | Email from: Ann Moynihan <Ann.Moynihan@pima.gov> To: CDRC Fri 6/10/2022 10:18 AM The Regional Flood Control District has reviewed the first submittal and has the following comment: A private sewer force main is proposed within the Rodeo Wash Drainageway for which the District has full maintenance responsibility. Utilities within maintenance areas create constraints to District operations if significant maintenance, dredging or construction are required. Force mains present additional risk because of potential for equipment failure. A public entity can provide more oversight for emergency operations while a private development has less capability for monitoring. Provide strong justification that an alternative is not available. Thank you, Ann B. Moynihan, P.E., CFM Pima County Regional Flood Control District 201 N. Stone Avenue, 9th Floor Tucson AZ 85701 520-724-4638 |
| 07/01/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA COUNTY - REGIONAL FLOOD CTRL DIST | Reqs Change | Email from: Ann Moynihan <Ann.Moynihan@pima.gov> To: CDRC Fri 7/1/2022 1:46 PM The District’s comments would be exactly the same for the north and south projects. But I would like a condition on both permits that a Facility Impact Permit from the Regional Flood Control District is required prior to start of construction. Ann Moynihan Pima County |
| 07/06/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: South Tucson Commerce Center Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0149 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 6, 2022 DUE DATE: July 8, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 05, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 - Provide an email address for the owner and engineer listed on sheet 1. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0149, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 - Under General Note 2 you list “(GENERAL COMMERCIAL)”, I-1 zone is not general commercial and should be listed as light industrial. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The existing use listed under General note 3 is not correct and should be listed as “VACANT”. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.B – As Alvernon Way is not designated as a Gateway on the COT MS&R Map remove the reference to “UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE (GCZ)” from General Note 20. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the zoning for the parcels north of this project. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The required number of accessible vehicle parking spaces is based on the requirements found in the 2018 IBC Chapter 11, Table 1106.1. Based on a total of 201 vehicle parking spaces provided the total number of accessible parking spaces required should be 7 with 2 being van accessible. Revise the accessible parking calculation to reflect the current number required and to show the van accessible requirements. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The required number of vehicle parking spaces listed under General Note 19 is not correct and should be 49. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – There appears to some type of fence along the north side of the north truck parking area. Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 are met. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a detail for the proposed long-term bicycle parking that meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - The street perimeter yard setback for “SIDE (ALVENON WAY)” should be measured from the back of future curb. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The perimeter yard setbacks shown for the “FRONT” & “SIDE” ae not correct and should be 0’. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height and use of the building within the building footprint. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – There appears to be some type of crosswalk that runs through the accessible vehicle parking space shown near the southeast corner of the building. This crosswalk shall not run through the parking space. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/03/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 08/08/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | |
| 08/08/2022 | SBEASLE1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Needs Review |