Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0124
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/01/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/09/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/13/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0124 Address: 5217 S 12th Ave Zoning: Existing Use: Food Service Proposed Use: Food Service TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 13, 2022 DUE DATE: June 9, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. General Note - Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 3. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 4. A 10’ interior landscape border and a 5’ wall is required along the east property line adjacent to any residential use. UDC Table 7.6.4-1. 5. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 6. The double loaded parking area requires additional trees. Placing trees along the at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 7. Please distinguish between the mitigation plants and the other required plants on the legend, symbol or any other method that would communicate the information. Please note that mitigation trees are in addition to other required trees. 8. Please provide a summary of quantities of mitigation in a manner that makes it simple to cross check between landscape and NPP plans. 9. Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 10. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 11. Keynotes are not consistent. 12. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 13. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The water harvesting plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. Provide flow arrows. 14. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted by an approved professional; engineers are not included on this list. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/14/2022 | IMONSHI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Iman Monshizadeh PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: El Guero Canelo Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0124 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 6/14/2022 DUE DATE: 6/09/2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 11, 2023. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP22-0124, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – Clarify that a retail use is proposed in general note 2, Retail is considered a use group, provide the specific use and the use specific standards for the proposed retail use in general note 2. If retail is referencing the area of the restaurant that is used by customers (dining area) and not a separate use, then the retail use can be removed from the plans and the entire site would be considered food and beverage sales as part of the commercial use group 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide the total floor area of the structures proposed on the site 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – 12th Ave has a proposed width of 100’. Show the proposed right of way expansion on the site plan on the next submittal. 12th Ave also has a Temporary Construction Easement of 12’. Information on this TCE can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/apps/maps-and-records/construction-plans/details/I-2020-007 Clarify on the next submittal if this is still in effect or not. If this TCE is in effect, provide it on the site plan and clarify that it is dedicated and not being encroached upon by any new structures or parking spaces. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A - Property lines shown on the plans seem to be inconsistent with property lines shown on the Pima county assessors maps, specifically on the west side of the property facing 12th Ave. Pima county accessors maps can be found under the images tab at: https://www.asr.pima.gov/Parcel/Index If applicant has documentation of a survey showing otherwise, provide those documents on the next submittal. Provide the correct property lines on the next submittal 2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – All parcels must be combined prior to approval of Development Package. A letter from the Pima county assessor’s office showing that the combination is in the process of being recorded will be accepted. Provide this information on the next submittal. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the zoning classification for the parcel east of the project parcel (O-3) 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Parking calculations will be recalculated once the retail use is clarified as mentioned in a previous comment. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Ensure short term bicycle parking layout is meeting the minimum requirements shown on Figure 7.4.9-C UDC. Spaces must be at least 2’6” from any wall or barrier. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L - If applicable, provide all easement information on the site plan on the next submittal. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – MS&R setback of 21’ or H would result in 30’ setback from the back of future curb which is not met. Plans will need to be revised to meet this setback or a variance will be required to reduce the setback. Information on the variance process can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Zoning_Administration_Application_BA_fillable.pdf 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – show pedestrian crossing stripping from the south parking lot to the structure similar to that shown on the north parking lot. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S – Show the site is meeting the requirements for sidewalks as stated in the standard above on the next submittal. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Provide a general note stating that all mail will be received within the building. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Iman Monshizadeh at (520) 837-4082 or by email Iman.Monshizadeh@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/24/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | DP22-0124 Comments: 1. Provide 5' sidewalk along entire frontage of property along Utah St. 2. Where the onsite pedestrian circulation path intersects sidewalk in the ROW, both on Utah St and on 12th Ave, there will need to be an ADA Landing. Landings are to be a minimum of 60" X 60" and are not to exceed a 2% cross-slope in all directions. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/10/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Balanced basin detention will be required and since the entire site is to be demolished and re-developed, vacant land should be used for pre-developed conditions. 2. Provide complete discussion, calculations and exhibits to establish accomplishment of first flush requirements. For calculations supporting first-flush retention provide a table accounting for the entire project area and applicable volumes. See the examples on pages 12 and 13 of the Detention/Retention Manual. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/12/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Jeffrey Stanley 08/12/22 REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0124 Site/Grading/Floodplain - El Guero Canelo. Demolition of old restaurant building and construction of a new restaurant. 5201 S 12TH AV Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |
| 08/12/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Passed | EMAIL FROM: Nicholas Jordan To: CDRC 09/06/2022 Please remove Pima County Addressing from the review for DP22-0124 as it does not require review. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |