Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP22-0100
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/19/2022 | SAMUEL ROGERS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Samuel Rogers, AICP PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: North Tucson Commerce Center Development Package (2nd Review) DP22-0100 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 19, 2022 DUE DATE: September 1, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 18, 2023. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS This comment was not addressed: COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - The existing use listed under General note 3 is not correct and should be listed as "VACANT". 1. This comment was not addressed: COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A - As this site is being development and will operate as a single site a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessor's Combination form with the next submittal. 2. This comment was not addressed: COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 - There appears to some type of fence along the west side of the access lane along the west side of building #1 that continues around the northwest corner, demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b are met. 3. This comment has not been addressed: COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The required number of accessible vehicle parking spaces is based on the requirements found in the 2018 IBC Chapter 11, Table 1106.1. Based on a total of 446 vehicle parking spaces provided the total number of accessible parking spaces required should be 9 with 2 being van accessible. Revise the accessible parking calculation to reflect the current number required and to show the van accessible requirements. 4. This comment has not been addressed: COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - There appears to some type of fence along the north side of the north parking area. Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 are met. 5. This comment was not addressed: COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a detail for the proposed long-term bicycle parking that meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9. 6. This comment was not addressed, sheet 6 shows the setback of 76.9' measured from the property line, revise to show the setback measure from the back of curb and update General Note 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - The street perimeter yard setback for Alvernon Way should be measured from the back of future curb. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Samuel Rogers at Samuel.Rogers@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/31/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/07/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: North Tucson Commerce Center ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0100 Address: 2780 E Valencia Rd Zoning: I-1 Existing Use: undisturbed Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: Distribution Center TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 7, 2022 DUE DATE: September 1, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. This comment was not adequately addressed - Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 2. It appears that there is landscaping within the rights of way. Please contact David.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov for permission to use up to 5’ of the right of way. Plans cannot be approved without the department’s consent. 3. This comment was not adequately addressed - The ERR requires exhibits that show floodplain, riparian area and proposed disturbance, as well as mitigation. Please refer to Tech Standards 4-01.2.5.B for content requirements. There is no “minor” ERZ report. 4. This comment has not been completely addressed. All water from the roof and parking area on the south has been graded to direct runoff to the basin. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. Water harvesting has not yet been maximized. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. 5. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. Please ensure that 6-9” depth is achieved after 2” placement of d.g. (details, notes should show a 8-11” depth. 6. This comment has not been adequately addressed along the south border- Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. Add flow arrows showing how water is draining to the south landscape areas. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/13/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. See previous comments about maximizing water harvesting - I see on the rain water harvesting plan all the water harvesting catchment areas, but on the grading plan it still doesn't look like any runoff is being directed to them. Revise as needed to demonstrate that this site is maximizing water harvesting. 2. The grading plan needs to indicated that the water harvesting catchment areas are depressed 6"-9" either on the plan or in a general note. It just needs to be on the grading sheet not just the rain water harvesting plan. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/19/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Plans shall show the location of the new and existing fire hydrants Plans shall show the location of the FDC's Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Tucson Fire Department Fire Plans Examiner Fire Inspector I, II and Fire Alarm Plans Examiner Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov Desk: 520-837-7033 |
| 09/20/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA COUNTY - REGIONAL FLOOD CTRL DIST | Approved | email from: Ann Moynihan <Ann.Moynihan@pima.gov> To: CDRC Date: 09/20/2022 The District has no further requests for corrections. Conditionally approved: A Facility Impact Permit from the Regional Flood Control District is required prior to construction of the private sewer across the Rodeo Wash channel. Thank you, Ann B. Moynihan, P.E., CFM Pima County Regional Flood Control District 201 N. Stone Avenue, 9th Floor Tucson AZ 85701 520-724-4638 |
| 09/27/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | EMAIL FROM: COTDSDPermits To: Steve Harder, Jeff Stine 09/27/2022 REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0100 Site/Grading: Tucson Commerce Center (NORTH side of Rodeo Wash). Three industrial warehouses. 3780 E VALENCIA RD Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on the blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your THIRD submittal documents accordingly, example: 3_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) |
| 09/27/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | DP22-0100 Comments: 1. Please note, on the plan, the Sight Visibility Triangle- "Lengths." If the "Line Table" on sheet 5 is a table of sight visibility triangles, they're incorrect. (It isn't very clear.) The stem side of the triangles are always going to be 20'. All of the SVTs on Valencia will have the same lengths. a. Valencia- Near side 345' and the far side will be the Pedestrian Triangle- 30'. b. Alvernon Way- At the entrance furthest north- Near side 345' far side is the Pedestrian Triangle, 30'. The other SVTs on Alvernon Way will be Near side 345' and far side 125'. c. Palo Verde- Near side 185' and far side 110'. d. Please refer to the COT Technical Manual 10-01.5.3 (and Figure 16 in list of figures.) David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |