Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0100
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/10/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA COUNTY - REGIONAL FLOOD CTRL DIST | Reqs Change | Email from: Ann Moynihan <Ann.Moynihan@pima.gov> To: CDRC Fri 6/10/2022 10:18 AM The Regional Flood Control District has reviewed the first submittal and has the following comment: A private sewer force main is proposed within the Rodeo Wash Drainageway for which the District has full maintenance responsibility. Utilities within maintenance areas create constraints to District operations if significant maintenance, dredging or construction are required. Force mains present additional risk because of potential for equipment failure. A public entity can provide more oversight for emergency operations while a private development has less capability for monitoring. Provide strong justification that an alternative is not available. Thank you, Ann B. Moynihan, P.E., CFM Pima County Regional Flood Control District 201 N. Stone Avenue, 9th Floor Tucson AZ 85701 520-724-4638 |
| 06/10/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA COUNTY - REGIONAL FLOOD CTRL DIST | Reqs Change | Email from: Ann Moynihan <Ann.Moynihan@pima.gov> to: CDRC Fri 7/1/2022 1:46 PM The District’s comments would be exactly the same for the north and south projects. But I would like a condition on both permits that a Facility Impact Permit from the Regional Flood Control District is required prior to start of construction. Ann Moynihan Pima County |
| 06/14/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the site utility drawings to include the invert and rim elevations of all manholes along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Determine the need for backwater valves per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 06/16/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: North Tucson Commerce Center Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0100 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 16, 2022 DUE DATE: June 14, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 18, 2023. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index on sheet 1 shows a total of 31 sheets but only 11 were submitted. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the owner and engineer listed on sheet 1. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The total number of sheets listed in the title Block is 48, the sheet index shows 31 and only 11 were submitted, clarify/correct the number of sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0100, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – Under General Note 2 you list “(GENERAL COMMERCIAL)”, I-1 zone is not general commercial and should be listed as light industrial. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The existing use listed under General note 3 is not correct and should be listed as “VACANT”. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this site is being development and will operate as a single site a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessor’s Combination form with the next submittal. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – There appears to some type of fence along the west side of the access lane along the west side of building #1 that continues around the northwest corner, demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b are met. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - As this site is being development and will operate as a single site the vehicle parking space calculation should include the total required and provided for the entire site. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The required number of accessible vehicle parking spaces is based on the requirements found in the 2018 IBC Chapter 11, Table 1106.1. Based on a total of 446 vehicle parking spaces provided the total number of accessible parking spaces required should be 9 with 2 being van accessible. Revise the accessible parking calculation to reflect the current number required and to show the van accessible requirements. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – There appears to some type of fence along the north side of the north parking area. Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 are met. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – As this site is being development and will operate as a single site the long-term bicycle parking space calculation should include the total required and provided for the entire site. Also, per UDC Article 7.4.3.G Fractional Amounts, When the calculation of required motor vehicle and bicycle parking spaces results in a fractional number, a fraction of one-half or more is adjusted to the next higher whole number, and a fraction of less than one-half is adjusted to the next lower whole number. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for the proposed long-term bicycle parking that meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setback for Alvernon Way should be measured from the back of future curb. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height and use of each building within the building footprint. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A provide a sidewalk is required to connect to the sidewalks within the Alvernon & Palo Verde right-of-ways. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/22/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Buildings exceeding 30' shall have one full side with aerial fire department access IFC 2018, Appendix D, D105.3 and the road shall meet D105.2 & D105.3. Provide a Fire Protection Sheet that will show the aerial access along with a note: Aerial access shall also meet D105.4 Obstructions. Aerial access road shall never have awnings, carports, solar shades and or other obstructions placed and or planted. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033Fire Plans Examiner |
| 06/23/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: North Tucson Commerce Center ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0100 Address: 2780 E Valencia Rd Zoning: I-1 Existing Use: undisturbed Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: Distribution Center TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 23, 2022 DUE DATE: June 14, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. General Note - Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 1. The landscape plans do not match the scope of work shown on the civil drawing. Please remove landscape, NPP and water harvesting plans if the DP is not including building 3 or clearly indicate the scope of work 2. Please screen back the improvements so the aerial is readable on the NPP plan. 3. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 4. There should be additional trees (about 6 or so parking spaces) instead of along the north side of the parking area. All spaces within 40' of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 5. The ERR requires exhibits that show floodplain, riparian area and proposed disturbance, as well as mitigation. Please refer to Tech Standards 4-01.2.5.B for content requirements. 6. Please provide a summary of quantities of total inventoried, mitigation and TOS plants in a manner that makes it simple to cross check between landscape and NPP plans. This can be an added row on the Native Plant Preservation Worksheet. Additionally, sort the inventory list by species and add a total. 7. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized. It appears that a lot of water from impervious surfaces are being directed to the basins rather than the landscape areas. UDC Technical Standards Manual - Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. 8. The below comments are directed to the engineer's drainage solution. The grading plan and water harvesting plan must meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation, nor do the grading plans match the water harvesting plans. a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible. b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas. c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas. d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. e. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. f. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. 9. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. Add flow arrows showing how water is draining to landscape areas. 11. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/24/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | DP22-0100 Comments: 1. Plans look very good, very thorough. Just a couple of things. 2. I see the OHE that runs parallel to Valencia Rd (east/ west.) There appears to be a power pole directly adjacent to the property entryway which is opposite of Hemisphere Loop. It is logical to have an entrance there since there is an existing opening in the median curb of Valencia. Show this power pole on sheet 6 and note how it is addressed, or if it is within the alignment of the property entrance at that point. 3. Please add sight visibility triangles to all of the entrances of ingress/ egress of the property. Valencia Rd is an MS&R street. The near side should be 345' and the far side should be 125'. 4. The sight visibility triangles on Palo Verde (Palo Verde Rd is not an MS&R street) its SVTs should be, near side 185' ad far side 110'. 5. The TIA recommends stop signs at all of the exits of the property onto Valencia Rd. 6. Protect in place existing catch basins. 7. Protect in place existing regulatory/ warning signs, or relocate them accordingly. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/20/2022 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Complete all blanks for required information, including but not limited to General Note 5 on sheet 1. 2. Revise general note 16 on sheet 1 to reflect the requirements of the retention/detention manual for water harvesting to be between 6 and 9 inches. Sec 5.3.1.2 3. Revise the solid waste enclosure details to provide bollards along the sides. 4. Clarify the minimum surface for vehicle use areas as specified in UDC 7.4.6.I.1 5. Revise the crosswalks through the PAALs so the crosswalk doesn't pass behind parking spaces. TS 7-01.4.1.F 6. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized. It appears that a lot of water from impervious surfaces are being directed to the basins rather than the landscape areas. UDC Technical Standards Manual - Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. 7. The grading plan and water harvesting plan must meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation, nor do the grading plans match the water harvesting plans. a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible. b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas. c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas. d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. e. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. f. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. 8. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. Add flow arrows showing how water is draining to landscape areas. 9. Show roof drainage patterns. Show how roof drainage contributes to the water harvesting plan. And show how pedestrians circulation routes are kept flood-free for up to a 10 year event. Drainage report: 1. On page 6, explain the asterisk in table 3. 2. The City of Tucson amendments to the retention/detention manual require the reduction of discharges in critical basins to 85 percent of predevelopment discharges. Revise the drainage report to reflect the correct standard. 3. Ensure the drainage report is consistent with the commercial water harvesting requirements. Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Jeff Stine cc: Steve Harder Fri 7/22/2022 11:19 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0100 Site/Grading: Tucson Commerce Center (north side of Rodeo Wash). Three industrial warehouses. 3780 E VALENCIA RD Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |
| 07/22/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Approved | Email from: Eric Latto To: CDRC Thu 7/21/2022 4:31 PM I see no problem with this. Thanks, Eric Latto City of Tucson Transit |