Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0003
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/28/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/28/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 01/28/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 01/28/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 02/07/2022 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Completed | |
| 02/14/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The use of saddle-type fittings to connect to a private sewer is prohibited, use directional wye fittings to connect the building sewers to the sewer main. Reference: Section 707.1 (6), IPC 2018 and Detail RWRD 401. 2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (MH 5692-01, 2468.73) is higher than the first floor elevation (2467.75). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 02/15/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please provide waste stream calculations. 2. Please combine Drainage notes #1 and 2 to become one note per Administrative Manual Section 2-06.3.0 - 4.7 General Notes B. Drainage Notes. 3. Please provide contact information of geotechnical engineer. Sheet 4 4. Please label all proposed basins. 5. To be van accessible, the aisle must be provided on the passenger side. In this case, the left stall is van accessible, but the right is just an accessible space. 6. Please label/callout ADA Signage for the single ADA stall. 7. Please provide an ADA access ramp and detail at the double ADA stall (This sheet and detail on sheet 6). 8. Please provide documentation from owner allowing for the construction of the southern drive. Sheet 5 9. Please clarify TW2 (along Tucson Market Place Blvd). There is only one elevation provided for TW2. Please provide a complete abbreviations list on first or second sheet. 10. Please provide addition elevations at air station and 4' sidewalk next to the air station. 11. Please clarify purpose/connection of the sidewalk in the SE near the air station. Sheet 6 12. Please provide additional spot elevation at all building doors to make sure that the ADA landing areas is 1.5% max as shown on sheet C113. 13. Please provide addition elevation at ice kiosk. 14. Please provide additional elevation grades and/or slope arrows throughout grading plan. Sheet 9 15. Please provide WSEL for ALL proposed basins. 16. Please add flow direction for all proposed storm drain pipes. 17. Please provide the plan number associated with the existing 24" SD. Sheet 10 18. Please relabel or remove the XXXX cross section at the fuel area. This sheet and next. Sheet 16 19. Please review the ADEQ 2020 checklist for applicable notes to add to the SWPPP plan including but not limited to spill response plan and pollution generating activities. Sheet 17 20. Please clarify the stage in which phase 2 is applied. Drainage Comments: 1. General Note - This project is located in a Balanced Basin. Please describe and demonstrate how developed peak discharges will be reduced to not exceed existing conditions. 2. Developed Conditions - Text indicates CP1.0 grate should be 6in above basin floor but Rim Elevation indicates 0.33' difference. Please review and revise as necessary. 3. Developed Conditions - Text indicates 100-yr peak Discharge of 14cfs but 'Table of Onsite Developed Peak Discharges' indicates the peak discharge is 15cfs. Please review and revise as necessary. 4. Conclusion - Runoff draining to existing storm drain system. Please indicate/demonstrate existing system has capacity. 5. Attachment 1 - Hydrologic Data Sheets indicate PC-HYDRO ver 3.0 was used; however, newest version is 7.1. Acceptable methods for determining peak discharges are COT method outlined in COT Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM) or PC-HYDRO 7.1. Please revise as necessary. 6. Attachment 2 - First flush calculations look good but please include an exhibit to go along with the first flush calculations that help illustrate the numbers used in the spreadsheet calculations. The exhibit should include such elements as: undisturbed areas delineated and sq footage, disturbed areas delineated and sq footage, impervious surfaces delineated and sq footage, non-contributing basins with landscape delineated and sq footage, stormwater harvesting basins including first flush delineated and sq footage, stormwater harvesting basin #s, flow direction, and water shed #s. 7. Attachment 2 - Curb Opening Capacity equation shown in calculation does not match SMDDFM Eq 10.6.2 - Capacity of a Curb Inlet in Sag. Manual indicates value of "C" should be 2.3 while calculations show value of 3 was used. Utilizing SMDDFM value, CP1.1 and 2.1 appear undersized. Please review and revise as necessary. 8. Attachment 2 - Curb Opening Capacity does not include clogging factor or ponding depth results at inlet. Please review and revise as necessary. 9. Attachment 2 - Grate Inlet in Sag sheet shows clogging calculated at 0.00% which is not consistent with SMDDFM. Please review and revise as necessary. 10. Attachment 2 - Grate Inlet in Sag sheet indicates a local depression of 0.7 inches but grate is located within the basin, 6 inches above the bottom, not along gutter and curb. Please review and revise as necessary. 11. Attachment 2 - Grate Inlet in Sag sheets solve for spread. CP 1.1 indicates 58.02 ft which appears to pond out of the basin into the parking area. Please review and revise as necessary. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/17/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Thu 2/17/2022 8:20 AM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 631-2030 |
| 02/21/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | Approved. (The letter can be viewed as a PDF. See the "Documents" section of PRO: "Tucson Airport Authority, Approval Letter, 02.17.22") |
| 02/28/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Quiktrip Store #1480 @ Tucson Marketplace Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0003 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 28, 2022 DUE DATE: February 17, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 13, 2023. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) within the title block on all sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0003, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.6 – As this project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – Revise Zoning and Land Use note 1 to show “PAD-15”. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - Provide the required updated Bridges Tracking Table in your next submittal. Contact Elisa Hamblin for a copy of the up to date excel file. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Show the existing zoning as PAD-15. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – It is not clear if the vehicle parking calculation includes the outdoor seating shown on the plan. Per UDC Article 7.4.3.F.4 the outdoor seating is required to be included in the calculation. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per PAD-15 Section C.2.3.C.4.i the required parking for retail is “4 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of GFA” not 1 space per 300 sq. ft as listed in the vehicle parking space calculation. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – For the short-term bicycle parking clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.b, .c, .f, & .g are met. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A at least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. Provide the required sidewalk out to Park Ave. 13. COMMENT: Provide a copy of the required Design Review Committee approval letter with your next submittal, see PAD-15 Section C.6. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/01/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | No Comments from DTM Traffic |
| 03/02/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/16/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: QuikTrip #1480 ACTIVITY NO: Dp22-0003 Address: 920 E Tucson Marketplace Blvd Zoning: PAD-15 Existing Use: graded, vacant land Proposed Use: convenience market with gas TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 16, 2022 DUE DATE: February 17, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 3. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape/planting plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 4. The tree calculation for the east border is incorrect. The number of trees shown on the plan is also incorrect. 5. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2. 6. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC Tech Standards 4.01-2.A. 7. Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 8. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/18/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Linda Thompson Fri 3/18/2022 4:35 PM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0003 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp - QuikTrip store # 1480. 920 E TUCSON MARKETPLACE BL FEE BALANCE: $ 5,193.39 See image at end of this email. Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENTS If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff - Select "PLANS" for all documents for quicker downloading of your documents on our end Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 03/18/2022 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Email from: Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov> To: CDRC Fri 3/18/2022 3:05 PM ADOT has no comments on this DP. Jay Gomes Arizona Department of Transportation |
| 08/01/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Approved. View in DOCUMENTS section of PRO, titled "Tucson Electric Power, approval letter, 07.02.22", and "Tucson Electric Power, facilities map, 07.02.22" |