Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP21-0237
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/26/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/27/2022 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Completed | |
| 01/27/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | 1. For future reference projects submitted after June 1st of 2021 need to comply with the new Detention/Retention Manual which requires first flush calculations/exhibits in stead of 5-year retention. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/16/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/01/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Oasis Subdivision – Lots 1-23 Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0237 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 1, 2022 DUE DATE: February 22, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 06, 2022. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U – Per rezoning condition #8 the allowed building height is 21’, revise General Note 17 to reflect the maximum building height allowed of 21’. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 2. The setback reduction request has been forwarded to Scott Clark for approval but until approved Zoning cannot approve this DP. Contact Elisa Hamblin if you have any questions. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.A – As the street perimeter yard setbacks are not meeting the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 & Table 6.4.5.C-1, ADT over 140 but less than 1,000, an administrative reduction will need to be approved, see UDC Article 8.7.3.L. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/02/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Approved | Email from: <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Wed 3/2/2022 11:38 AM Pima County Addressing approves Oasis, 2nd Submittal Review: DP21-0237. Thank you Nicholas Jordan, Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 724-9623 |
| 03/09/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/11/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | No Comments from Traffic |
| 03/14/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/30/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits to: lisa bowers Wed 3/30/2022 4:00 PM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0237 DESCRIPTION: Tentative Plat / Flexible Lot Development - Oasis Subdivision FEE BALANCE: $ 82.50 ONLINE PAYMENTS If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your THIRD submittal documents accordingly, example: 3_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff - Select "PLANS" for all documents for quicker downloading on our end Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 03/30/2022 | NMARTEL1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: March 30, 2022 TO: Nicholas Martell, Planner, City of Tucson FROM: Rick Gonzalez, Architect (#26992) COT On-Call Design Professional RE: DP Review, Oasis Subdivision, DP21-0237 I have reviewed the Development Package for a Flexible Lot Development (DP21-0237) submitted March 2022 for the purpose of determining conformance with the Design Requirements of the FLD. I have checked the submittal against the Flexible Lot Development (FLD) Development Requirements relative to Section 8.7.3., Design Standards under procedure described in Section M4a. Submittal Requirements Status 8.7.3. FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD)-SUBDIVISION DESIGN STANDARDS 1. Additional Functional Open Space The project preserves at least 20% more Complies Functional Open Space than is required by Functional Open Space Requirements. The additional open space shall be usable for passive or active recreational uses, such as trails, walking paths, picnic areas, and playgrounds. 2. Additional Open Space within an FLD N/A to this project Greater than 5 Acres The project preserves features in a natural state at least 15% more area than is required by other sections of the UDC, including, but not limited to: Sections. These natural features include, but are not limited to, vegetation, washes, riparian floodplain, and hillsides. 3. Proximity to an Arterial Street Verify proximity to transit The project is located in the City's Central facilities Core and is on a designated arterial street near transit facilities to promote the use of transit and reduce vehicle trips. The project density does not conflict with any applicable area or neighborhood plan. 4. Trail or Wildlife Corridor Dedication N/A to this project The FLD provides for dedication of trails or wildlife corridors, or both, that connect to offsite trails and wildlife corridors as approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. 5. Green Building Indicate how the project complies The project is designed and located to Green Building Requirements comply with the energy efficiency (TSM 3-01.3.0) requirements. 6. Regulations for FLD Projects The following regulations are required of all FLD projects: 1. Development Alternative A is for standard FLDs. Applicable to this project 2. Development Alternative B is for Maximum Density N/A to this project Option FLDs. Zone R-3; Alt. A; Site Coverage 70%; Complies other than max. ht allowed Density 36; Building Height 40' Call-Out on Plan 7. Minimum Lot Size There is no minimum lot size within an R-2 FLD, N/A, proposed zoning is R-3 except as follows: All lots developed with a septic system shall N/A to this project be at least one acre. 8. Open Space Requirements Functional Open Space Area Requirements Functional open space shall be provided as shown: 5 acres or less (<13 DU/AC = 109 sf/DU); Applies - Note lot areas on plans > 13 DU/AC=161sf/AC; N/A to this project More than 5 acres (269sf/DU) N/A to this project Functional open space shall be for an active recreational, passive recreational or scenic purpose. An FLD shall provide functional open space amenities appropriate for the mix of residents for which the FLD project is designed. A homeowners' association or management Add a note onto the plans in organization shall be established by the regard to this submital developer to be responsible for the ownership, requirement permanent care, and maintenance of functional open space areas. Any portion of the FLD project site that has been Note on plans areas of functional dedicated to and accepted by a public entity for open space public use as a functional open space amenity may be included in meeting the functional open space area requirements. Dedications that meet this requirement include, but are not limited to, parks, trail, and detention and retention basins that incorporate Multiple-Use Concepts and Aesthetic Design Guidelines. The portion of the FLD project site that includes N/A all or portion of a trail located within a natural open space or natural undisturbed open space may be included in complying with the functional open space area requirements. Exemptions The following FLD projects are Indicate if this project meets the exempt from functional open space requirements: exemption 1 with proximity to (1) An FLD project with 60 lots or fewer located and acreage of McCormick within one-quarter of a mile of a City community Park park of at least 15 acres which does not require crossing an arterial roadway to reach the park; or, (2) An FLD project zoned SR, SH, RX-1 or RX-2. 9. Configuration and Location of Functional Indicate areas or cite exemptions Open Space within an FLD Project a. FLD projects five acres and less. Functional open space amenities should be configured as contiguous areas, but may also be incorporated into the design of other elements on the site, such as detention/retention basins and buffers, in order to make those areas functional. b. FLD projects more than five acres. Functional N/A to this project open space may be divided into smaller areas if they are distributed throughout the project site and conveniently located for residents of the FLD project. c. Functional open space shall be conveniently Indicate areas or cite exemptions located to and usable by the maximum number of the residential units on the site. d. To the greatest extent possible, functional open Indicate FOS areas or cite exemptions space should not be comprised of remnant areas that are not usable by residents of the FLD project. e. Where the project is located near a public preserve, N/A to this project or can provide connections to open space areas or areas of environmentally or culturally significant features, the open space shall be configured in a manner to preserve this connectivity. 10. Detention and Retention Basis Indicate FOS areas or cite exemptions To the greatest degree practicable, detention and retention basins within an FLD shall be designed as Functional Open Space by incorporating the Multiple-Use Concepts and Aesthetic Design Guidelines. Functional Open Space amenities within detention and retention basins may count toward meeting Functional Open Space requirements 11. Landscaping, Screening and Wall Requirements 1. One canopy tree shall be provided every 40 1. provide trees along south feet of pedestrian circulation systems, excluding pedestrian walkway or equivalent crossings with streets, alleys, and driveways. number If providing canopy trees every 40 feet is not achievable, the applicant shall: a. Provide the equivalent number of trees that would be obtained using the 40-foot increment measure; and, b. Distribute the trees within the FLD project b. provide required trees site along pedestrian circulation systems and along south pedestrian within functional open space areas. 3. Landscape walkway plans shall incorporate water-conserving design. 4. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated 4. Complies as part of the landscape design. 5. Mechanical 5. Indicate compliance equipment, utility boxes, irrigation equipment and similar elements shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the FLD. 6. If a 6. Complies perimeter wall is proposed along an existing public right-of-way, it shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The wall shall incorporate one or more of the following decorative materials: Tile, Stone, Brick, Adobe, a textured material such as stucco or plaster, or Metal. 12. Parking An alley abutting an existing N/A development shall not be used for parking access. 1. 1. a., b., c., d. Complies Common parking areas shall meet the following requirements: a. No more than 60 parking spaces may be located in any single outdoor parking area; b. There shall be a minimum of 30-foot separation between common parking areas. Common parking areas shall be separated by a building or landscaping; c. The same parking area access lane (PAAL) may provide access to two or more parking areas; and, d. Curbed areas shall provide openings to allow water to flow into landscaped areas and water harvesting basins. 13. Circulation and Connectivity All elements of an FLD, including residential units and recreational amenities, shall be connected by a pedestrian circulation system. 1. Interior pedestrian sidewalks shall connect 1. Complies to sidewalks on abutting streets and to abutting commercial and recreational facilities with adjacent property owner's consent. 2. Bus N/A turn-out lanes and bus waiting shelters shall be provided if requested by the City. 3. Barrier free access to functional open space amenities: a. Barrier free access to functional open space Indicate FOS barrier free amenities shall be provided. Exception:FLDs access or cite exemptions using the Housing for the Elderly maximum development option shall provide barrier free access pursuant to the City's adopted Building Code. or 50%, but not less than one, of each type of functional open space amenity, whichever is greater. Trails that have current or future linkages to other trails, open space areas or recreation areas shall be provided as determined by the City's Parks and Recreation Department. a. Trails shall be constructed in compliance with the design criteria established for trails. Hard and soft surface paths, when required, shall have an average separation of at least five feet to allow for landscaping that does not interfere with the paths, except where a reduced width is allowed by the City's Parks and Recreation Department. 14. Perimeter Yards Along FLD Project Site Boundaries 6' or 2/3 height Perimeter yards along FLD project site boundaries are required in accordance the site's underlying zone. 1. Street perimeter yards along FLD project site boundaries are required unless special zoning requirements dictate a greater distance or different point of measurement. 15. Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots 1. Perimeter 6' or 2/3 height yards may be reduced for setbacks along interior lot lines. 2. Along interior street lot lines, street perimeter yards are required. The street setback may be administratively reduced by the PDSD Director based on a finding that the reduced setback enhances the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and a transportation statement is approved by the City's Traffic Engineering division. A street perimeter yard reduction request is considered for approval concurrent with the processing of the plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. 3. Along parking area access lanes (PAALs), setbacks are required. Design Criteria 16. Architectural Variation Purpose Applicability (1) Projects with 20 or more single-family detached Please provide an AVP residential units except when residential units are on lots larger than 10,000 square feet or, where dwelling units are separated by 30 feet or more; or, (2) Elevations of single-family detached units abutting a public street designated as a collector or arterial street in the Major Streets and Routes Plan; or, a private or public street designed and/or designated as a residential collector street. Requirements (1) The same architectural elevation shall not be repeated more often than every fourth lot. (2) Architectural variation may be accomplished by incorporating a minimum of two of the following design features into the affected elevations: different building footprint orientation, building elevation, garage placement, roof type, ornamentation, or architectural style. (3) Garage Placement. For FLD projects with over 20 or more single-family detached residential units, no more than 50% of detached residential units throughout the FLD shall be designed with garages that protrude from or are flush with the front wall of the living area or front porch of the house. Architectural Variation Plan Required The AVP shall be included with the subdivision plat, site plan, or building permit submittal. 17. Transition Edge Treatment and Mitigation for Adjacent Properties Transition Edge Treatment Where a single-family attached or multi-family FLD N/A for detached project is adjacent to existing single-family residential development, the FLD shall provide buffering in order to preserve the privacy of the existing residential development. Examples of buffering include, but are not limited to, landscaping, a fence, or a wall. The proposed buffering shall be included as conditions on the approved subdivision plat or site plan. Privacy Mitigation Applicability Privacy mitigation is required when multistory A PMP N/A to this project residences are proposed adjacent to existing single story residences and the existing residences are zoned R-2 or more restrictive. Prohibited Improvements Balconies, windows (except for clerestory and translucent windows), or any other feature on an upper floor that overlook the rear and side yards of an adjacent residence are prohibited. 18. Privacy Mitigation Plan (a) PMPs shall demonstrate that adequate measures, such as screening, setbacks, building mass, solar access, air circulation, and light access are incorporated into the design of the project to preserve the existing residents' privacy. (b) PMPs shall be included with submittal of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. 19. Solar Access and Passive Solar Solar Access Dwelling units should be configured to allow Optional solar access to adjacent structures. Passive Solar FLD projects should incorporate passive solar Optional design when practicable. 20. Alternative Compliance. Optional Alternative Compliance requests may be considered. General Comments: Please respond to yellow highlighted comments indicated above. Based on review of the TP Package for Oasis Subdivision, I recommend resubmittal of the DP resubmittal as indicated in my General Comment above. Sincerely, Rick Gonzalez, Architect RGA |