Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0170
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/02/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/02/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Approved | EMail from: Christopher.Blue@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Fri 7/2/2021 1:17 PM The Transit Services Division and Sun Tran have no comments. Thank you, Chris Blue City of Tucson |
| 07/06/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Sheet 1 1. Place stamp in legible area. Typical on all sheets. 2. Provide the name and date of the geotechnical report. Provide the name, address, and phone number of the firm who prepared the report. 3. Include an additional 3"x5" space for the use of PIMA County. Sheet 3 4. Please add a keynote on plan for the existing curb that will remain in place, if any. Sheet 4 5. Please revise the grading in the north part of the driveway in order for water to flow south as the drainage arrows show it should be. 6. The ponding depth of Basin 1.0 is greater than the difference between the bottom and top elevation. Please revise. 7. Please provide spot grades for basin 1.0 spillway. Drainage Report Comments: Sheet 6 1. Note that the TSMS methodology is not the same as what is calculated using PC-Hydro. Sheet 7 2. Calculations using the City of Tucson Methodology is preferred. PC Hydro has been accepted in the past, however, the current version would need to be used. The most current version of PC Hydro is 7.1 and can be found online through the Pima County Flood Control District website. Sheet 25 3. Please verify Top elevation of basin and revise as necessary. Plans and contours show 97, which is only 1.0 ft of ponding not 1.5. 4. Figure 4 - Basin 1 outlet structure is missing. 5. Figure 4- Basin 3 shows no outlet structure and 0.2 cfs out. Please depict outflow from basin. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/21/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit. 2. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole or cleanout in the public sewer and the first-floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Coordinate the terminal locations of the water service and building sewer at the proposed building with the plumbing engineer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. |
| 08/02/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Take Five Oil Change Facility – 7970 E Broadway Blvd Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0170 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 2, 2021 DUE DATE: August 2, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 27, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0170, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Revise General Note 4 to show the use as “AUTOMOTIVE MINOR SERVICE AND REPAIR SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.4.F.2, .3, .4, & .5 and 4.9.13.O. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As a Zoning Examiner Special Exception Procedure, Section 3.4.3 is required for the proposed use in the C-1 Zone provide the SE number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Also, provide a general note stating the SE case number, date of approval, what was approved and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system for all property lines on the plan. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for the Broadway Blvd dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – Either a lot combination will be required or some type of cross access easement or agreement will need to be recorded. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the zoning for the parcels north of Broadway. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Remove the reference to “INCLUDING SERVICE BASE, WASH TUNNELS, OFFICE, AND RETAIL AREAS” as that statement only applies to Automotive Washing. Parking for Automotive Major and Minor Service and Repair is based on Gross Floor Area. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The required number of vehicle parking spaces is not correct. 1,174/300 = 3.9 or 4 required, one of which would be the required van-accessible space. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per the 2018 IBC Chapter 11, Section 1106.6 Location, Accessible parking spaces shall be located on the shortest accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible building entrance. The proposed accessible parking does not meet this standard. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Per UDC Article 7.4.3.A.2 Each Land Use Group (Group), except for Residential and Storage, has a standard minimum parking formula. The standard formula applies to every Land Use Class (Class) within that Group, except for those Classes specifically listed in the parking tables. That said the short-term bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, COMMERCIAL USE GROUP, 2 short-term bicycle parking spaces are required. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The plan and detail for the short-term bicycle parking does not address UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – Some type of cross access easement or agreement will need to be recorded for the access proposed along the southern portion of the site. Provide the recordation information on the plan. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setback information shown on the plan is not correct. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1, ADT of 1,000 or greater, the street perimeter yard setback is measured from the back of curb or future curb, greater of the two. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). Provide a sidewalk from the proposed building to the sidewalk along Broadway Blvd. This sidewalk is required to provide barrier-free accessibility for the physically disabled, see TSM Section 7-01.4.3.2. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. Provided the required sidewalk along the east side of the building. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas. Show the required sidewalk from the building to the dumpster. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating that “ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES SEPARATE PERMITS”. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/02/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/04/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Wed 8/4/2021 9:06 AM 1. Curb access ramps in the ROW are required to meet P.A.G. standard 207. Revise Construction Keynote 4 2. New pavement tie-in at Sherwood Village Dr. needs to meet P.A.G. standard 206 3. Provide spot-grades for curb access ramps: slope and cross-slope 4. Show spot-grades for pedestrian travel across new entryway off of Broadway Blvd. that meets ADA requirements. David Stiffey City of Tucson |
| 08/05/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Take 5 Oil Change ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0170 Address: 7970 E Broadway Blvd Zoning: C-1 Existing Use: previously grade land Proposed Use: Auto Service TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 5, 2021 DUE DATE: August 2, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. The Note on the landscape plan refers to The Bridges, please revise for this specific project. 3. Please change “10’ landscape setback” to 10’ landscape border (both civil and landscape plans). 4. Please label the existing and future rights of way for, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 5. Show the curb inlets for getting water to the WHIAs on the landscape plans (must match civil drawing). 6. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. 7. Please correct the calculations for the 10’ landscape street border. The correct formula is the area of a circle is not d squared. 8. Include parking area calculations for required trees, 2-10-4.2.A.2.c. Ensure that trees in vehicular use areas are planted within and adjacent to parking so that they afford the greatest amount of shade in paved areas, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. 9. Please show screen wall location on the landscape plan. Provide a detail for the 30” screen wall. 10. Please delete sheet 13, move only the NPP calculations to sheet 14. Combine sheet 15 and 16, much of the information on sheet 15 is not necessary or relevant. Retain the Landscape Border Table, provide correct calculations for the Landscape Border Plant Coverage. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/05/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Linda Thompson Thu 8/5/2021 1:29 PM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0170 Reviews have been completed. See details below. DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/SWPPP - Take 5 Oil Change facility. 7960 E BROADWAY BL FEES DUE: $ 3,045.62 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours after it is updated. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 07.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then enter permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |