Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0142
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/31/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Tri Miller Mon 1/31/2022 10:31 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0142 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp/Floodplain - Tucson Military Vehicle Museum, J-4217C. 6000 E VALENCIA RD FEE BALANCE: $ 8,469.52 (see image at end of this email) Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff - Select "PLANS" for documents for quicker downloading of your documents on our end Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 11/23/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 11/23/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 11/23/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/23/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 11/24/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Tucson Military Vehicle Museum Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0142 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 24, 2021 DUE DATE: November 30, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 03, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0142, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Revise Development Plan General Note 4 to include UDC Article 5.4 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As part of this site is located within the Davis-Monthan AFB Approach-Departure Corridor 2 and the entire site is located within the Davis-Monthan AFB Noise Control District B per UDC Article 5.6.8.B.2.a.(2) and 5.6.9.B.3.a.(3) Cultural Use is not an allowed use in this overlay. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – Clarify if you are proposing this use as an expansion of the Pima Air Museum or a stand-alone use, additional comments maybe forth coming. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – A lot combination is required for this project. Depending on how comment 4 above is addressed will determine what parcels will need to be combined. At a minimum parcel 140-36-013A & 140-36-013B will need to be combined. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessor’s Combo Request form with the next submittal. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Sheet 3 for the area at the west end of the proposed access lane that is called out as a “CONCRETE HEADER” clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 are met. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.6.D, 7.4.6.H.1 & 7.4.6.I are met for the existing access lane that you are proposing to use for access to the Tucson Military Vehicle Museum. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The vehicle use areas called out under Keynote 5 on sheets 4 & 5 does not meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.I. Provide written approved from the City Engineer approving the proposed compacted decomposed granite for this vehicle use areas. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Detail “F” sheet 12 the wheel stop location dimension is not shown correctly. Review UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 and provide the correct dimension. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – For the vehicle parking spaces located to the east and west of the proposed accessible parking space it appears that the pavement is flush with the sidewalk and would allow a parking vehicle access to the sidewalk. Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 are met for this area. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – If this is a stand-alone site and you are proposing access across the Pima Air Museum property some type of access easement or agreement is required. Provide a copy of the recorded access easement or agreement with the next submittal and provide the recordation information on the plan. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.3.3.A & 7.01.4.A are met. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of TSM Section 7.01.4.B are me along the south and east side of the proposed building. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/26/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Tue 11/23/2021 11:32 AM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 631-2030 |
| 11/29/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The maximum distance between manholes shall be 400-feet. Reference: Section 708.1.2, IPC 2018. |
| 11/30/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Email from: David Stiffey To: CDRC Tue 11/30/2021 7:57 AM Approved. No Comments. David Stiffey City of Tucson Transportation and Mobility |
| 12/01/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | (The "comment letter" mentioned below can be viewed in the "Documents" section of PRO: "TAA, review comments, first submittal, 11.30.21") Email from: Scott Robidoux <srobidoux@flytucson.com> To: CDRC Tue 11/30/2021 1:42 PM Attached is a copy of my comment letter on DP21-0142. I have included the applicant on this email so they can receive a copy of my comment letter and the TAA Avigation Easement document. Thank you, Scott Robidoux, C.M., Manager of Planning TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY 7250 South Tucson Boulevard, Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Phone 520-573-8100, Direct 520-573-4811 |
| 12/02/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Tucson Military Vehicle Museum ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0142 Address: 6000 E Valencia Rd Zoning: I-1 Existing Use: undisturbed Sonoran desert Proposed Use: Cultural use, museum TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 2, 2021 DUE DATE: November 30, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 3. Please label the existing and future rights of way for Valencia and Wilmot Rds, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 4. Street landscape borders are required along all MS&R streets. 5. How will tanks be prevented from driving into the native desert areas? Who will field adjust the track to avoid vegetation? 6. The bottom of the basin requires hydroseeding or other inorganic/organic ground cover, UDC 7.6.4.E. 7. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2. 8. On sheet ERR-03 there is a north/south sewer alignment that goes to Valencia Rd. through the wash and disturbs protected riparian areas. Is it possible to slightly shift this line to the west to take advantage of the already disturbed area? 9. On the same page, it is unclear as to the reason for needing to disturb the other two areas of protected riparian plants. Please clarify. 10. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide page/detail reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. See civil drawing is not sufficient. 11. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf 12. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape and grading plans must match. 13. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. 14. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 15. Identify curb inlets to landscape areas on landscape plans. 16. Modify details to show depressed landscape areas. 17. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC Tech Standards 4.01-2.A. 18. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 19. Please note that smaller caliper trees can used for TOS and will be counted towards larger caliper tree quantities. 20. Show on-site location of temporary plant nursery holding area or indicate if they will be transplanted directly to final location. Administrative Manual 2-11.4.5. Please include method and schedule for plant irrigation in holding area. 21. Revise the following note on sheet L-01 - The site developer must include language in all contracts with contractors about the importance of staying out of all areas and away from all individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/02/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | (The TEP FACILITIES MAP, TEP APPROVAL LETTER, and TEP DOCUMENT 11.29.21 can be viewed in the Documents section of PRO) Email from: <DesignAdmins@tep.com> To: CDRC Thu 12/2/2021 10:24 AM Attached is the response (approval) letter for Tucson Military Vehicle Museum, DP21-0142. Thank you, Conor Mahoney, Design Administrator Desk: (520) 918-8388 Cell: (520) 404-8437 |
| 12/06/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Plans shall show fire hydrant locations and the new fire sprinkler lines feeding the new buildings. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis 520-837-7033 Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/14/2021 | PMCLAUG1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Explain how the unpaved tracks will not present a dust-control problem. 2. Explain how vehicles will be prevented from driving off the paved surface in the areas with header instead of curb. 3. Discuss mitigation of the disturbed riparian resources. 4. Clearly show on the grading plan sheets how the grades support the water harvesting plan. 5. Show how solid waste will be collected and the containers serviced. Provide waste stream calculations. Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/14/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed |