Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP21-0094
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/04/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/06/2021 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PLAN SHEET mentioned in the last sentence can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) Email from: Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov> To: CDRC Fri 8/6/2021 2:51 PM The City of Tucson CDRC and Traffic Engineering Group should consider the following comments as recommended by ADOT Traffic Engineering review; The previous comments have been addressed as shown in their comment response letter. 1. It was determined that 3/4 access be provided for the southern access point along Kino Parkway, this needs to be verified and accepted by COT (traffic engineering). 2. Should the proposed 3/4 access be acceptable and remain, additional signage and striping needs to be implemented to ensure this operation. 3. Add a R3-5R "Right Turn Only" sign under the Stop Sign. Standard size is 30"X36". A "Right Turn Only" pavement marking arrow should also be provided at the driveway. 4. Add a R5-1 "Do Not Enter" sign and a R6-1R "One Way" sign in the median, approx. Sta. 18+64. Standard sizes are 30"X30" and 54"X18", respectively. 5. Comments also provided on the attached Plan Sheet. |
| 08/25/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | Letter: August 23, 2021 RE: DP21-0094 Site/Grading - Circle K at The Bridges, fuel canopy, roadway, median, 2nd submittal, Received August 4, 2021 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP21-0094 Circle K at The Bridges, fuel canopy, roadway, median; 2 nd Submittal, a development package application for a 1.386 acre site, which is located southwest of the intersection of East Tucson Marketplace Boulevard and South Kino Parkway. The property is zoned Planned Area Development 15 (PAD-15) and the project would support the development of a gas station, which would contained food and beverage sales and fuel dispensing uses. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority previously commented on the 1 st submittal of this project and noticed that the comment response letter for the 1st submittal documented the inclusion of the Conditions of approval within the cover sheet of the revised development plan. The Tucson Airport Authority was unable to find that the Conditions of approval note was included within the 2nd submittal of this development plan. The below conditions of approval must be included in the revised development package plan set. Conditions of approval: 1. "According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, this project area is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The project applicant shall file FAA Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the proposed project unless FAA staff, with the Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA), provides the project applicant with written communication that filing FAA Form 7460 is not required. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp" Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M., Senior Airport Planner |
| 08/26/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Circle K @ The Bridges Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0094 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 26, 2021 DUE DATE: August 31, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 14, 2021. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – Identify S. M. L. King Jr. Way on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide all applicable information for this development under DP21-0094. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – Provide the required Bridges Tracking Table in your next submittal. Contact Elisa Hamblin for a copy of the up to date excel file. Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. This comment was not fully addressed. Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Detail 9 sheet 4 should match what is proposed on sheet 2. Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.f, & .g are met. 4. This comment was not addressed. The requirement applies to public or private streets. You could apply for a Technical Standards Modification Request, TSMR, see TSM Section 1-01.6.0, and request to use the connect to Kino’s sidewalk around to S. M. L. King Jr Way as a modification. TSMR application can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Modification_Request_Application_for_Parking_Design_PDMR_or_Technical_Standard_TSMR.pdf. This type of modification has been supported previously on other developments. If you wish to just eliminate the sidewalk and not go through the TSMR process a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required, requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Zoning_Administration_Application_BA_fillable.pdf. Per TSM Section COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, provide a sidewalk out to S. M. L. King Jr. Way. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/27/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/01/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. See previous comment No. 7 - A SWPPP will be required as part of this grading permit. 2. See previous comment No. 10 - Kino Pw still not showing ROW dimensions for both sides of the street centerline. 3. See previous comment No. 17 - Still looks like the turning movement of the fuel tanker is entering in opposing traffic on ML King Jr Wy. 4. See previous comment No. 18 - See Technical Standards Manual section 8 figure 3A notes 1 and 2: 1. Concrete ramp to be a minimum of 24'x13' and shall slope 2% away from enclosure. 2. Concrete slab for enclosure shall slope at a 1% to gate opening. 5. Show compliance with UDC article 7.6.6.C.2 and how this site plan is maximizing water harvesting. It looks like all the parking lot runoff is directed to storm drains and none of the landscape areas receive parking lot/vehicle use area runoff. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/07/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA COUNTY - REGIONAL FLOOD CTRL DIST | Approved | Email from: Ann Moynihan <Ann.Moynihan@pima.gov> To: CDRC Tue 9/7/2021 8:12 AM After Stephen Blood indicated that Flood Control can issue its Facility Impact Permit prior to start of construction, I did not have further concerns. Thank you, Ann Moynihan Pima County |
| 09/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Wed 9/8/2021 2:52 PM Approved. No comments. David Stiffey City of Tucson |
| 09/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change |