Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0094
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/15/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/15/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 04/15/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 04/15/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 04/20/2021 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Reqs Change | Email from: Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov> To: CDRC@tucsonaz.gov Tue 4/20/2021 12:51 PM ADOT has the following comments on this submittal, due to the proximity of the Project to the I-10 Kino Parkway Traffic Interchange. The modifications to the Kino Parkway raised median to provide full access at the proposed south driveway will create additional conflict points along Kino Parkway and may negatively impact traffic operations. The shortening of the southbound left turn lane and lengthening of the NB left turn lane to align to provide a full access driveway for the development's south access point should be reviewed and analyzed to determine said impacts. We could not find a Traffic Study being provided in the DP, unless covered by another study? Please advise. If full access were considered, the shortened SB LT lane would not contain sufficient storage to meet current or future needs. In previous submittals for developments for the The Bridges, this median opening was being proposed to be closed due to the future need for additional storage for the Kino and Tucson Market Place Drive traffic signal, thus full access should not be allowed, unless determined otherwise. The NB Kino Parkway movement from the development can be made by using the internal circulation, or by exiting right from the north driveway and making a U-turn at the existing median opening, or making a left out onto MLK Drive to Tucson Market Place to Kino and using that signalized intersection. We look forward to reviewing responses to these comments. Thank you for your consideration. |
| 04/22/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Verify project address on each sheet. Plan set indicates site address as 3834 S. Kino Parkway, however the project application has been revised to 3434 S. Kino Parkway. 2. Provide Cut and Fill earthwork calculations for the project, include overexcavation and recompaction recommended in the project geotechnical report. 3. Ensure Legend on Cover Sheet matches the interior plan sheets. 4. Verify ML King Way street improvements have been constructed or that the proposed improvements for ML King Way will be constructed per separate Street Improvement Plan and permit. Reference the improvement plans for ML King Way on the Site and Grading Plans. 5. Add waste stream calculations and state the frequency of waste collection. 6. Provide name and date of the project geotechnical report, with the name, address and phone number of the firm who prepared the report. 7. A SWPPP will be required prior to grading. Sheet 2 8. Add bearing for 23.10' and 23.70' distances. 9. If any existing easements are located upon the property, show easement record information, location, width, and purposes. Blanket easements should be listed in notes with record data and proposed status. If no existing easements are located on the property, notate as such. 10. Add full ROW dimensions, both sides of the street centerline, for Kino Parkway and ML King Jr. Way. 11. Show Sight Visibility Triangles for Kino Parkway 12. Confirm no easements will be proposed on the project site. If easements are proposed, provide dimensions, and label as to the easements purpose and whether the easement will be public or private. 13. Show and Label existing right of way or future right of way dedication for ML King Jr Way 14. Provide the height of the structure within the footprint of the building. 15. Kino Parkway is identified as a Major Street or Route. Add the MS&R right of way lines, future sidewalk and sight visibility triangle. 16. Verify WB-50 is correct vehicle (WB-62 is current std) 17. Provide written verification from COT to allow turning movement of fuel tanker to traveling into opposing traffic within public R/W Sheet 6 18. Verify 2% slope has been provided away from trash enclosure. 19. Provide proposed drainage easement at both off-site rip rap outlets to Greyhound Wash 20. Show overexcavation limits for the proposed structure per the recommendations in the project geotechnical report. Sheet 7 21. Confirm utilities shown within S ML King Jr Way are existing. Otherwise, reference improvement plans that will construct the utilities. 22. Show size, direction, and distance to closest existing water and sewer systems. Sheet 8 23. Check TC labeled as 91.10 shown in the Kino Pkwy Entrance Blow Up Detail on sheet 8 and 9 Sheet 9 24. Verify a minimum of 2' has been provided between the sidewalk and back of curb. Label sidewalk width and verify the minimum sidewalk width requirement has been met based on street classification. 25. Verify concrete section of sidewalk at driveway 6" min. Drainage Comments: 1. Please include a drainage statement that summarizes the findings included in the drainage report for The Bridges B-III Infrastructure (DP19-0214). Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/22/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | In taking a look at this site plan, it seems like more water could be directed to landscaping instead of directed into a pipe. Could you please keep me in the review loop when the drainage statement is received? I also would like more detail on the outlet pads. How were dimensions determined? Are they in the floodplain? If so, cut-off walls to the expected scour depth will be required. It was also pointed out that MAG detail call outs are on Sheet 6. These should be changed to PAG. The retaining wall seems to be right on the District property line, so the easement may need to encompass some construction and maintenance access for those walls. Thanks much, Ann Ann B. Moynihan, P.E., CFM Pima County Regional Flood Control District 201 N. Stone Avenue, 9th Floor Tucson AZ 85701 520-724-4638 |
| 04/29/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | (The TEP FACILITIES MAP and TEP REDLINE MAP can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) WO#6350675 April 29, 2021 SUBJECT: Circle K at The Bridges, DP21-0094 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted April 20, 2021. There do not appear to be any conflicts. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Bianca Maubach New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH 204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-307-3864 Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer Martin Rodriguez, at (520) 991-5495 Sincerely, Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant TEP, Design/Build |
| 04/29/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 05/11/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Circle K @ The Bridges Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0094 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 11, 2021 DUE DATE: May 13, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 14, 2021. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email addresses for the Architect, Civil & Owner on the plan. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0094, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the land split case number, S19-056, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the final plat case number, S19-064, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – Identify S. M. L. King Jr. Way on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – Provide the required Bridges Tracking Table in your next submittal. Contact Elisa Hamblin for a copy of the up to date excel file. Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – Land Split S19-056 will need to be approved prior to approval of this DP. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a –Detail 7 sheet 4 shows a distance of 2’-0” from the end of the vehicle parking space to the bollards. Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 this distance shall be 2’-6”. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Detail 3 sheet 4 the mounting height dimension from the bottom of sign to finished grade shall be 7’-0”. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Detail 9 sheet 4 should match what is proposed on sheet 2. Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.f, & .g are met. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, provide a sidewalk out to S. M. L. King Jr. Way. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/13/2021 | JVINCEN1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/13/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | May 12, 2021 RE: DP21-0094 Site/Grading - Circle K at The Bridges, fuel canopy, roadway, median, 1st submittal, Received April 15, 2021 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP21-0094 Circle K at The Bridges, fuel canopy, roadway, median; 1 st Submittal, a development package application for a 1.386 acre site, which is located southwest of the intersection of East Tucson Marketplace Boulevard and South Kino Parkway. The property is zoned Planned Area Development 15 (PAD-15) and the project would support the development of a gas station, which would contained food and beverage sales and fuel dispensing uses. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following conditions of approval, as noted below. The below conditions of approval shall be included in the revised development package plan set. Conditions of approval: 1. “According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, this project area is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The project applicant shall file FAA Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the proposed project unless FAA staff, with the Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA), provides the project applicant with written communication that filing FAA Form 7460 is not required. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp” Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M., Senior Airport Planner |
| 05/14/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Fri 5/14/2021 10:19 AM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA, Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation, (520) 837-8040 |
| 05/24/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | Email from: John Beall <John.Beall@tucsonaz.gov> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 9:21 AM To: COTDSD Please close out the Entitlement review folder as Pass. Thank you. |
| 06/01/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: DP21-0094 Address: 3834 S. Kino Parkway Parcel: 132-13-069B Zoning: PAD-15 The Bridges Existing Use: Undeveloped vacant land Proposed Use: Circle K TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 1, 2021 DUE DATE: May 13, 2021 COMMENTS: 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. Add plant and irrigation maintenance schedule to plans, per UDC Administrative Manual 2-10-4.4. a. Pruning schedules to show that plant material will maintain pedestrian and vehicular clearances or that the material will establish opaque hedge screens, if required; b. Replacement criteria, should plant material not survive; c. Replacement or upkeep maintenance schedules for inert ground cover materials; d. Upkeep maintenance schedules for exterior hardscape materials; and, e. Maintenance and replacement schedules for irrigation systems. 3. Provide dimensions and calculations for the landscape border along M.L. King Parkway. 4. Show point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 5. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways and pavement. 6. Details for trees and shrubs should reflect the 6" depressed landscape area. 7. Provide a detail for the screen wall along Kino Parkway. 8. Provide required tree calculations for parking areas. Consider using a different species of tree in parking areas to provide the greatest amount of shade. 9. Provide explaination as to why 50% plant water needs cannot be provided through water harvesting. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4969. |
| 06/04/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email sent from: COTDSDPermits To: Jill Kaiser Fri 6/4/2021 9:09 AM Returned for Corrections Notice PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0094 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading - Circle K at The Bridges, fuel canopy, roadway, median. 3434 S KINO PW FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then enter the permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents - click on VIEW Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |
| 06/04/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Fri 6/4/2021 6:38 AM Comment DP21-0094 On sheet C4 (sheet 9,) Note 8 mentions "5’ New sidewalk." Also, just south of the sidewalk "match-point" is a sidewalk dimension of 6 Ft. The same sidewalk dimension of 6 Ft. is given on C1 (sheet 6) This same dimension of 6 Ft. is given on the "Site Plan" page SP (sheet 2) Either sidewalk dimension is appropriate-whether 6’ wide or 5’ wide, but please edit all references to reflect the same width. |