Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP21-0076
Parcel: 10319001S

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP21-0076
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/02/2021 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
04/02/2021 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed
04/02/2021 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
04/02/2021 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
04/06/2021 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Development Package Comments:
Sheet 1
1. Please provide information of soils engineer
2. Please label major streets on location maps.

Sheet 3
3. Please include existing south street name, right-of-way widths, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, and sidewalks
4. Please include existing east street name
5. Please clear overlapping text on all sheets.
6. Please revise construction note for utility between lot 48 and lot 47 on sheet 3.

Sheet 4
7. Please include existing street name, right-of-way widths, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, and sidewalks.

Sheet 5
8. Please revise invert in and invert out elevations for MH 17. It seems like they might be switched.

Sheet 6
9. Please be consistent with construction notes. Sheet 7 shows a different construction notes.
10. Please provide invert elevation for existing 48" sewer main at MH 1
11. Please provide street names on Sheet 6.

Sheet 7
12. Please revise invert in and invert out elevations at MH 21, MH 20, and MH 19. It seems like they are switched.
13. Please be consistent with construction notes. Sheet 6 shows a different construction note.

Sheet 8
14. If this is the proposed sewer main then use the same linetype as sheets 3-7 on Rock House Lane.
15. Evaluate cover requirements for SRP - less than 1' between subgrade and top of pipe.
16. Need more design detail on tranverse grate structure. Typically EF-1 grates are not used on this type of inlet

Sheet 10
17. Provide FG at lot 53 and at Isabel Mine Rd. cul-de-sac.
18. Provide FG for area below lot 83, NE of Isabel Mine Rd/ Goret Rd intersection.
19. Need outlet protection at end of transverse grate

Sheet 11
20. Please provide a roadway section on the east portion of Mount Scott LP.
21. Sheet 10 shows W Mount Scott to be a crowned roadway. Please clarify the drainage pattern to the scupper.
22. Need toe down of all grouted riprap
23. Add channel dimensions at Section B|11
24. Show extents of wall as depicted in Typical Section
25. Design east/north channel consistent with COT guidance including bends, freeboard and collector channel requirements. Flow should be contained in east channel and not spill onto adjacent property. North channel slope is only about 0.04%.
26. Add weir structure from WH 2 to plans. Need detail

Sheet 12
27. Provide Flowline elevations for scuppers.
28. Please provide documentation demonstrating basin drains/ percolates.
29. Need slope protection where flow enters WH 1

Sheet 13
30. Provide retaining wall design on these plans if applicable

SWPPP Comments:
Sheet 57
1. Please label property boundary
2. Please provide spill response note.
3. Please provide the location and distance to nearest receiving waters on plan view and location map
4. Please provide inlet/outlet protection on all scuppers (Mount Scott LP)

Drainage Comments:
General
1. Need infiltration test results for all basins to confirm drain time since low flow outlets are not provided

Sheet 5
2. Add summary tables for basins and hydraulic structures either in report or on Figure 5.

Sheet 19 (Figure 4)
3. Add contour elevations, existing conditions flow arrows and concentration points with Qs on project boundary. Figure should clearly depict existing conditions to allow comparison to proposed

Sheet 20 (Figure 20)
4. Show design data for all WH basins (Qin, Qout, inlet/oulet elevations, bottom elevation etc)
5. Show all points of discharge and developed Qs . Label all hydraulic structures with labels that correlate to the corresponding calculations
6. How is the 21 cfs in the fire lane contained as there does not appear to be curb?

Sheet 46
7. Provide all parameters used in the calculation.

Sheet 48
8. Provide all parameters used in the calculation
.
Sheet 67
9. Mannings "n" appears too low for earthen bottom with riprap slopes.

Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact:
Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
04/06/2021 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved 04/05/21
ADOT South Central District Office and Regional Traffic have reviewed the request and have no comments on this submittal. The development will have no direct impacts to ADOT facilities because of the location.
Thank you
Richard La Pierre
Permits Supervisor, South Central District
1221 South Second Avenue
Tucson, Arizona 85713
520.388.4234 (office), 520.307.5893 (cell)
RLaPierre@azdot.gov
04/12/2021 ALEXANDRA HINES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Reqs Change Provide response how standards in 8.7.3.M. Architectural Variation Plan are compliant in renderings, similar format to Privacy Mitigation Plan document submitted.
04/22/2021 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit.
2. Assuming the FFE is 6” above the pad elevation, the following lots need to be revised:
a. The following lots do not require the installation of a backwater valve: 37, 38, and 39.
b. The following lots do require the installation of a backwater valve: 9, 17, 26, 43, 47, 48, 84, 85, 86, 87,88, 89, 90, 91, 102, and 103.
3. The legend on sheet 1 shows a backwater valve labeled as “BWV” but on sheets 3 and 5, the label is “BFV”; please coordinate.
04/28/2021 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review

PROJECT: West Bridge at Silverbell
Development Package (1st Review)
DP21-0076

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 28, 2021

DUE DATE: April 30, 2021

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 01, 2022.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0076, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Revise General Note 16 to include “UDC Article 5.3” for the Scenic Corridor Zone.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Clearly demonstrate that all requirements UDC Article 5.3 are met to include but not limited to 5.3.4.A, 5.3.5.A.3 & 5.3.6.B.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Add the following to the “PROPOSED HEIGHT listed under “ZONING CODE CHECK” “WITHIN THE SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED IS 24’-0”.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – All easements show to be “ABANDONED BY SEPARTE INSTRUMENT” shall be abandoned prior to approval of this DP. Provide the recordation information on the plan.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined.
7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 – Sheet 6 east end of Goret Rd provide some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing unimproved areas of the site, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The rear setbacks listed under “ZONING CODE CHECK” and detail A sheet 13 are not correct and should be listed as “perimeter yard setbacks along FLD project site boundaries are required in accordance the site ’s underlying zone as provided in Section 6.3.4, Dimensional Standards and Exceptions Tables and along interior lot lines to the extent permitted by the City’s adopted Building Codes.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Add the following to the garage setback listed under “ZONING CODE CHECK” and detail A sheet 13, “MINIMUM 18’-0” TO PROPERTY LINE”.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Add “REQUIRED PERIMETER YARD SETBACK ALONG SILVERBELL IS 3 TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE”.

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)

2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:

11. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – Clearly demonstrate how the common areas called out as “FUNCTIONAL OPEN SPACE” meet the requirements of UDC Article 8.7.3.F.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.E – An Architectural Variation Plan (AVP)shall be submitted and approved prior to approval of the first residential building plan. If your plan is not to submit an AVP with the DP provided a note on the DP stating that the AVP must be submitted and approved prior to the approval of the first building plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
04/30/2021 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.)

Email from: Robin Freiman <Addressing@pima.gov>
To: CDRC
Fri 4/30/2021 1:17 PM

West Bridge at Silverbell, Tentative Plat, 1st submittal review, DP21-0076 is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.
The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Robin Freiman, Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
04/30/2021 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved Email from: Howard Dutt
To: CDRC
Fri 4/30/2021 9:30 AM

No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA, Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks and Recreation, (520) 837-8040
05/13/2021 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD REVIEW Reqs Change Email from: Christopher Blue
To: CDRC
Wed 5/12/2021 7:35 AM

Sun Tran Route 21 currently uses the pullout on W Goret Rd as its end-of-line stop. The existing turnaround area just east of the stop is necessary for the bus to turn around safely.

The City of Tucson and Sun Tran respectfully request that this project include a roundabout at the intersection of W Goret Rd and N Isabel Mine Rd, large enough to allow the bus to turn around safely.
Thank you,

Christopher Blue
Transit Services Coordinator | Transit Services Division
Department of Transportation & Mobility
mobile: 520.260.9558
05/13/2021 JPEELDA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Hydrants shall be within 600' of the furthest part of each house.
Subdivision shall have two access points meeting the IFC D106.2 and or the houses shall have fire sprinklers installed.
Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov
520-837-7033
05/18/2021 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved Email from: David Stiffey
To: CDRC
Tue 5/18/2021 12:44 PM

Approved.


David Stiffey, Program Coordinator
City of Tucson
Transportation and Mobility
email: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov
05/27/2021 AWARNER1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination

FROM: Anne Warner, RLA
PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section

PROJECT: DP21-0076
Address: 3196 N. Silverbell Rd, Mattamy Silverbell/Goret
Parcel: 103-19-001S
Zoning: R-1
Existing Use: Previously graded vacant land
Proposed Use: Single Family Residential

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 24, 2021
DUE DATE: April 30, 2021
COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section 5.

1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

2. Please ensure that all related case numbers and this DP number are on all plans.

3. Silverbell is spelled incorrectly in the title block.

4. Identify the ground cover in basins, hydroseed or d.g. on W-1. Basin outline, slopes and civil reference sheet number should appear on all sheets. UDC AM 2-10.4.1

5. On sheet W-1, the surface treatment falls short of the wall and adjacent property line, is there a reason for this?

6. Add calculations of linear and square feet of all landscape borders and required plant coverage, as well as number of trees required and provided. Please label landscape border width on all plans. AM Section 2-10-4.2.A.2.f. & .g

7. Resolve graphic conflicts with planting symbols and underlying Common Area description and square footage.

8. Show sight triangles on all streets and assure that plants meet the visibility requirements.

9. Provide construction details reference numbers for screening/monument walls on W plans.

10. Per UDC AM 2-10-4.2.B.6 provide a detail or note that shows landscape areas depressed at a minimum of 4” to provide for water collection or describe other methods of water harvesting/runoff to be directed towards planting areas. Modify details to show depression.

11. Show outline and side slopes of all basins, reference page number on civil plans. UDC AM 2-10.4.1

12. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC AM 2-10-4.2.A.4.

13. Under “Landscape Notes” number 12, add “amended” to native soil. On detail 1 Tree Planting, add specs for backfill and soil amendment mix.

14. Detail 8 reveal should be 1-2” - 1” rather than 2.5” which presents a tripping hazard. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/transportation/files/408_Typ_Curb_Sidewlk_Grade_With_DG.pdf

15. All details on sheet D-2 do not show the minimum dimension from finish grade to the top of footers, please provide.

16. Note #6 requires a reference to root barriers near hardscape, add detail showing root barriers.

17. Remove Planting Note #3, it is already in General Landscape Note #12.

18. Add notes for planting in the rights-of-way;

a. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair.
b. The owner takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities.
c. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW is polyethylene type tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment must be on private property. (excluding water meter).

19. Indicate the disposition of the existing curb cut on Goret Rd at lot 29.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4969.
05/28/2021 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Email sent from: COTDSDPermits
To: Natalee Perry
Fri 5/28/2021 4:01 PM

Returned for Corrections Notice
PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0076

DESCRIPTION:
Tentative Plat/FLD - West Bridge at Silverbell, a flexible lot development. Lots 1 thru 105, and common areas A-1- thru A-8 (drainage, retention, open space), B-1 thru B-9 (buffer yard, landscape, drainage), and C (functional open space).

FEES DUE: $ 8,662.37
Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. Thank you.

ONLINE PAYMENT
If amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after it is updated.
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees
1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees
2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000
(not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed)
3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank
4- Click "Continue"
5- Pay column - check the boxes
6- Click "Continue"

INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL
1) Comment Response Letter
(your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21

FILEDROP
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
(Select "Existing Application", then enter the permit number)

SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab
- Reviews - click on REVIEW DETAILS
- Documents - click on VIEW


Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist

City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services
Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov
(disregard the email response that will be sent automatically)
Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov
05/28/2021 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Needs Review