Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0034
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/12/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/25/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Sheet 1 1. Please add COT/PC boundary to legend. 2. General Note 25 is contained in Note 24 and is therefore, not required. 3. Please provide North arrow and scale on project overview map. 4. AM 2-06.4.9F Provide Zone boundary and labels on all plan sheets and in legend. Include all adjacent zone boundaries and labels. 5. Please provide sheet cuts on the cover sheet. 6. AM 2-06.4.7 General Note 3 should list all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 7. General Note 19 calls out I-2 Zoning. Please correct to I-1 Zoning. 8. General Note 18 should provide the calculations and clarify if the containers currently provided service an existing area. Verify that the capacity is sufficient to support the existing and proposed demand. Sheet 2 1. TSM 2-01.7.2 Cut slopes steeper than 2:1 may only be provided under the recommendation of a either a soils engineering or engineering geology report. Please revise 1:1 grouted rock riprap and details L/3 and U/3 accordingly. 2. Provide dimensions for road in the culvert profile; dimension from face of curb to top of slope; evaluate need for barrier protection (vehicle//pedestrian). 3. General Grading Note 37 and 42 suggest the existence of a geotechnical report for this site, however, Note 22 says one was not provided. Please revise accordingly. Sheet 3 1. Change sign from Marana to City of Tucson. 2. TSM 10-01.3.0 Pavement section 1 does not conform to the minimum 3.5" AC over 100% compacted subgrade requirement. Please revise accordingly. 3. Site plan does not indicate an ADA ramp as called out in Detail C/3. Please revise. 4. Detail F/3 must be revised to provide 7' vertical clearance per TSM 7-01.4.3B. 5. Detail G, Parking stall half-width of 4' does not agree with full-width of 8.5'. Please revise. Sheet 4 1. Please provide substantial spot grades. 2. Please provide the slope at the bottom of the drainage basin. 3. Unable to locate keynote 7 nor the corresponding detail. Please note the location of the existing trash enclosure and provide correct reference to the detail. Also provide wastestream calculations. Drainage Comments: 1. Section 2.2 - Delete duplicate "Zone" or update sentence as necessary. 2. Section 2.3.1 - Please clarify 100-YEAR one-hour rainfall in the second sentence. 3. Section 2.3.1_OFF-1 - Please clarify sentence 2 regarding flows (...through two via overland...). 4. Section 2.3.2 - Please check spelling and grammar in sentences 4 and 5. 5. Table 1, 2 & 3 - Addition of OFF-1 from Table 1 and EON-1 from Table 2 & 3 (16.8 + 27.6 = 44.4cfs) do not match Q100 results shown for CP01. 6. Section 3.3.1 - Description of flow does not match Exhibit A.2. 7. Apdx A - Please update Exhibit number on Existing Conditions Drainage Map to reflect A.1 8. Apdx C - Please provide channel confluence calculations at outlet into existing channel south of Valencia Road demonstrating the and outlet velocity of 12.35fps with a 90-degree turn does not adversely impact flow regime within existing channel. 9. Apdx C - HY8 results indicate a headwater depth of 2.55' but the channel Cross Section "S" on sheet 3 of the Development Plan indicates a channel depth of only 1.5' along the north side of Old Vail Road. The headwater elevation is shown at 2783.55 with a top of curb elevation of 2783.26' at the tie-in. Please indicate if flows are contained within the channel or if overtopping into Old Vail is anticipated. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/10/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will may be needed and should contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number DP21-034 on each sheet. Set Aside Methodology The preservation and mitigation standards of this section is satisfied by the set aside of an area of the site as Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) in conformance with the following standards. The provisions of this section may be combined, or used in conjunction, with the Plant Inventory Methodology (Section 7.7.5.A.1) and/or the Plant Appraisal Methodology (Section 7.7.5.A.2), in accordance with Section 7.7.5.A.4, Combined Methodologies. a. Site Assessment An Environmental Resource Report (ERR) in accordance with Sections 2-03.5.0, Environmental Resource Report, and 2-11.4.5, Set Aside Submittal, of the Administrative Manual must be prepared for the entire site to determine the general viability, density, and variety of Protected Native Plants within areas on the site. The ERR shall include an assessment of such areas of NUOS and shall prioritize the natural resource value of vegetated areas on the site in conformance with the intent and purpose of this section. Any area left undisturbed as provided in this Section must be shown in the ERR, and no other assessment need be done for such areas. The natural resource value for an area is assessed by the consideration of factors such as: (1) Health, size, density , and variety of native plant species; (2) The visual resource value of the area(s); and, (3) The potential to maximize the preservation of contiguous areas of NUOS both on- and off-site . The Set aside area must be recorded in a surveyable manner. Include recordation verification. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 03/11/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/11/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: Old Vail Road RV Storage Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0034 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 11, 2021 DUE DATE: March 10, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 11, 2022. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.5 – Remove the development package approval stamp from sheet 1 as an approval stamp will be affixed electronically. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email addresses, of the primary property owner and engineer. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The total number of pages shown in the title block shall include all pages,11, provided in the submittal. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0038, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Revise General Note 3 to show the use as Personal Storage and include all Use Specific Standards listed for the I-1 zone in TABLE 4.8-5: PERMITTED USES - INDUSTRIAL ZONES. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & ARTICLE 5.6 AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ).” 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.A – Provide the Original City Zoning case number, C15-18-07, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Per UDC Article 5.6.8.B.1.c provide a floor area ratio calculation on the plan that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.6. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks for both Valencia and Old Vail. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said, it appears that there are four (4) areas on the site that will allow vehicles to access unimproved areas, northeast, northwest and southwest corners of the site and just south of the propose office building. Cleary show how vehicles will be prevented from accessing these areas. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Neither of the accessible vehicle parking spaces shown on the plan/detail meet the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.2 for a van accessible space. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, STORAGE USE GROUP, Personal Storage, 2 short-term bicycle parking spaces are required. Provide a short-term bicycle parking calculation on the plan, show the location of the required short-term bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail that demonstrates that the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B & .C are met. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.6 – As phasing is proposed clearly show have vehicles will be prevented from accessing the 2nd phase until such time as the second phase is completed. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a street perimeter yard setback dimension from the proposed office building to Old Vail. This setback is based on UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1, ADT over 140 but less than 1,000. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and the height of the proposed office building and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. That said. Provide a sidewalk from the proposed building south to the property line along Old Vail Rd. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Cleary show the location of the refuse collection area and provide the required pedestrian circulation, see TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.B provide the required sidewalk along the north & east side of the proposed building. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – It is not clear if the “ADA ACCESS ROUTE” called out under Keynote 6 running east from the proposed office building to PAAL meets the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.3.C. 21. COMMENT: General Note 19 references “REATIL USE IN I-2” zoning, remove this reference from the note and provide the correct use and zoning. 22. COMMENT: Provide a copy of the agreement referenced in General Note 24 with your next submittal. Also, clearly show the propose “AWNINGS/COVERD PARKING STRUCTURES” on this DP. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin, Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/16/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/16/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: March 16, 2021 Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0034 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp - Old Vail Road RV Storage, 6991 E OLD VAIL RD FEES DUE: $ 4,031.08 Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees If information is not available or amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after data is updated. (Visa, MC, Discover, American Express, or pay from bank account) 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes 6- Click Continue RESUBMITTAL Submit the following documents to: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document For all NEW development package submittals on the Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW...". Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov (Disregard the automatic reply you will receive: "This email account is not...") |