Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0032
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/08/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/11/2021 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP21-0032 1) Include all standard applicable notes found in the COT Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06, including but not limited to the hold harmless note in AM 2-06.4.7 and Drainage will remain in its natural state note 2) Provide A basis of bearings and elevation according to Administrative Manual Section 2-06.4.8 3) Approval by the department of transportation real-estate is required for the new proposed 6' easement across Ganley Rd. Special conditions will apply to this easement. 4) Sheet 2 please show parking stalls using a different line weight and color so they are easily distinguishable 5) Show on plans future and existing Site Visibility Triangles for the driveway connections to Ganley Rd. Reference Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 10-01.5.0. Show that site functions with Ganley road is expanded 6) Work in the Right of Way requires a separate Right of Way Permit John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/10/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: CAID – METER 3 Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0032 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 10, 2021 DUE DATE: March 09, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 07, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0032, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a street perimeter yard setback from the proposed canopy to Ganley Rd based on UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1, ADT over 140 but less than 1,000. 3. Based on aerial photos there was an expansion of this parking lot around 2010. Provide a copy of the approved plan for the parking expansion with your next submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin, Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/10/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data The Development Package will may be needed and should contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number DP21-0032 on each sheet. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering, and Design Professional comments and concerns are addressed, |
| 03/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: March 11, 2021 Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0032 DESCRIPTION: SITE - CAID, Meter 3, solar parking canopies, 2275 E GANLEY RD FEES DUE: $ 429.00 Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees If information is not available or amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after data is updated. (Visa, MC, Discover, American Express, or pay from bank account) 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes 6- Click Continue RESUBMITTAL Submit the following documents to: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document For all NEW development package submittals on the Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW...". Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov (Disregard the automatic reply you will receive: "This email account is not...".) |
| 03/11/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |