Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP21-0026
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/22/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/03/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 05/17/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Approved | Email from: Robin Freiman <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Mon 5/17/2021 12:59 PM 1526 North Alvernon, DP21-0026 , 2nd submittal review is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 724-7570 |
| 05/19/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: 1526 N Alvernon Ave Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0026 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 19, 2021 DUE DATE: May 19, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 01, 2022. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 1. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – General Note 22 calls out Alvernon to be a Gateway Corridor but north of Speedway Alvernon is not a Gateway, remove this reference from the note. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. This comment was not addressed, no detail provided on sheet 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – Show the future sight visibility triangles on the plan. 3. This comment was not addressed. Also based on the Accessible Parking Detail for Building #1, sheet 7 the proposed accessible parking does not provide a van accessible space and per 2018 IBC Chapter 11 Section 1106.5 at least one of the two accessible space must be van accessible. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide the number of Van accessible parking spaces required and provided. Base on the details provided on sheet 7 none of the accessible vehicle parking spaces meet the requirements of ICC A117.1, Section 502.2. 4. This comment was not addressed correctly. The required street perimeter yard setback is 21’ or the height of the building exterior wall, greater of the two, measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. This site is considered developing area based on the definition of established area and all street perimeter yard setbacks are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 & Table 6.4.5.C-1, you cannot mix established area setbacks with developing area setbacks. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks shown to Lee St. appear to be shown incorrectly. These setbacks should be shown from the building to the nearest edge of travel lane. It appears that once shown correctly Buildings 1 & 2 with meet street perimeter yard setbacks to Lee St. 5. Based on the change of building height the required street perimeter yard setback from the future curb along Alvernon should not be listed as 21’. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Based on the 28.0’ setback shown for Building 3 to the back of future curb along Alvernon a Board of Adjustment for Variance will need to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this DP. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The perimeter yard setbacks for the north & west streets are not correct. The required street perimeter yard setback is 21’ or the height of the building exterior wall, greater of the two, for the west it is measured from the back of future curb and for the north it is measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. This site is considered developing area based on the definition of established area and all street perimeter yard setbacks are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 & Table 6.4.5.C-1 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Per IBC 1104.1 demonstrate on the plan that there is an accessible route between all structures, on site. It does not appear that Building 1 & 4 connect to the other buildings. This route must also meet the requirements of TSM 7-01. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Provide documentation from John Beall that this proposed development is in substantial compliance with the PDP. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin, Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/25/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. In the comment responses for comments 4 and 5, it is stated that the floodplain use permit # T21OT00256 has been added to the title block and that the required floodplain note is now on the cover sheet - I could not find either please make sure to include the referenced floodplain use permit # and indicate which general note contains the flooplain note. 2. The FFE elevations for the proposed buildings on both the grading sheet and the drainage report appear to be typos and are set 400 feet or so below grade. Please check those and ensure the right elevations are shown. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/07/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email sent from: COTDSDPermits To: Lisa Bowers Wed 6/9/2021 9:30 AM Returned for Corrections Notice PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0026 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/SWPPP - 1526 N. Alvernon Way, three new commercial bldgs, 1 new food service bldg with drive-thr FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 3rd submittal documents according to this example: 3_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then enter the permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |