Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0026
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/02/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 02/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 02/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 02/15/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | (The TEP FACILITIES MAP and TEP REDLINE MAP can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) WO#6340150 Februray 12 2021 SUBJECT: 1526 N Alvernon DP21-0026 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted February 3rd, 2021. There do not appear to be any conflicts. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Bianca Maubach New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH 204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-307-3864 Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer Martin Rodriguez, at (520) 991-5495 Sincerely, Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant Design/Build |
| 02/23/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: 1526 N Alvernon Ave Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0026 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 23, 2021 DUE DATE: February 25, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 01, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0026, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – As this site has an associated rezoning, C9-95-10, provide documentation that the proposed development is in compliance with the Preliminary Development Plan. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The Use Specific Standards show for “GENERAL MERCHANDISE & SALES (EXCLUDING LARGE RETAIL ESTABLISHEMENTS) are incorrect and should be 4.9.9.B.3 and 4.9.13.O. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Based on Use Specific Standard, 4.9.4.M.1 listed under General Note 3 and the drive-through shown on the plan, it appears that you are also proposing food service. If this is the case list it as a proposed use along with the applicable Use Specific Standards. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – List all proposed uses and any applicable Use Specific Standards. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – General Note 22 calls out Alvernon to be a Gateway Corridor but north of Speedway Alvernon is not a Gateway, remove this reference from the note. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this site is made up of four (4) parcels a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessor’s Combo Request form with your next submittal. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – Show the future sight visibility triangles on the plan. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 5 has been addressed the vehicle parking space calculation cannot be verified. Since it appears you are using the Shopping Center calculation you must demonstrate that no more than 50% of the floor area is dedicated to uses with a parking formula of one space per 100 square feet of gross floor area or a more intense formula. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide the number of Van accessible parking spaces required and provided. Base on the details provided on sheet 7 none of the accessible vehicle parking spaces meet the requirements of ICC A117.1, Section 502.2. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short- and long-term bicycle parking calculation called out under General Note 18 states that “2 SPACES” are provided but the plan shows 8, clarify. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail G sheet 6 provide the 2’-6” required distance between the short-term bicycle rack and the long-term lockers, see UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks shown to Lee St. appear to be shown incorrectly. These setbacks should be shown from the building to the nearest edge of travel lane. It appears that once shown correctly Buildings 1 & 2 with meet street perimeter yard setbacks to Lee St. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Based on the 28.0’ setback shown for Building 3 to the back of future curb along Alvernon a Board of Adjustment for Variance will need to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this DP. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a street perimeter yard setback dimension from Building 2 west to back of future curb along Alvernon. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES, C-1 Zone, Nonresidential Use to a Residential Zone the required perimeter yard setback is 1-1/2 time the height of the proposed exterior building wall. That all said the required perimeter yard setback to the east property line is 45’-0” not 30’-0” as shown under General Note 17 and on sheet 3. You can include the reduction of the perimeter yard setback in your variance for the street perimeter yard setback along Alvernon. 17. COMMENT: -06.4.9.O – The required perimeter yard setback shown under General Note 17 for the south perimeter is not totally correct. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES, C-1 Zone, Nonresidential Use to a Residential Zone the required perimeter yard setback is 1-1/2 time the height of the proposed exterior building wall. That all said for the area zoned R-2 along the south property line the required perimeter yard setback is 45’-0” 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Per IBC 1104.1 demonstrate on the plan that there is an accessible route between all structures, on site. It does not appear that Building 1 & 4 connect to the other buildings. This route must also meet the requirements of TSM 7-01. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate on the plan or details that the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 505.10 are met. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – There appears to be some type of path proposed to connect to a residential property to the east, clarify what is happening. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin, Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/24/2021 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 02/24/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will may be needed and should contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number DP21-0026 on each sheet. SECTION 4-01.0.0: COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING 1.3 Applicability This standard applies to all commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010. 4-01.3.0 RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN A Rainwater Harvesting Plan shall be submitted with all applications for commercial developments at which landscaping is required. The Rainwater Harvesting Plan shall consist of two elements: a Site Water Budget and a Water Harvesting Implementation Plan. Preparation of the Rainwater Harvesting Plan elements requires coordination between project managers, site engineers and landscape architects from the inception of the project. The two elements of the Rainwater Harvesting Plan shall illustrate how water harvesting will meet 50% of annual landscape water demand, as required by the ordinance Submit Water Harvesting Plan Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 02/24/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | 02/23/21 No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA, Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 837-8040 |
| 02/25/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The maximum distance between cleanouts shall be 100-feet, measured along the developed pipe length (see building #4. Reference: Section 708.1.1, IPC 2018. |
| 02/25/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) 02/24/21 1st submittal review - 1526 N. Alvernon, DP21-0026 is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department (520) 724-7570 |
| 03/02/2021 | MROSS2 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | Depending on occupancy type, the buildings may require fire sprinklers, defered submital would be required through TFD. Michael Ross 520-837-7082 Michael.Ross2@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/04/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 03/05/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Approved | 03/04/21 The Transit Services Division and Sun Tran have no comments. Thank you, Christopher Blue Transit Services Coordinator | Transit Services Division Department of Transportation & Mobility C: 520.260.9558 |
| 03/17/2021 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Condition 1.c of the rezoning ordinance requires the solid waste containers to be sited away from adjacent residential as shown on the preliminary development plan. Demonstrate compliance with this condition. 2. Condition 1.c of the rezoning ordinance limits building height to 24 feet. Show compliance with this condition. 3. On the SWPPP map ensure the fiber roll along the eastern property line will not cause adverse impacts on adjacent properties. 4. A floodplain use permit is required for this project. Please start a floodplain use permit at: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp 5. Add the required floodplain note to the general notes. 6. Note that each building will also require a separate floodplain use permit and elevation certificate. 7. In the drainage report address whether this development will cause an adverse impact on nearby properties. 8. In the drainage report show existing and developed water service elevations. Indicate the minimum floor elevation for each building location. 9. In the drainage report provide the calculation for the required retention volume. 10. On the development package show water surface contours. The contours should be no more than 200 feet apart. 11. Ensure the FFE for each structure is at least one foot above the WSE. |
| 03/18/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: March 18, 2021 Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0026 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/SWPPP - 1526 N. Alvernon Way FEES DUE: $ 1,025.00 ONLINE PAYMENT https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees If information is not available or amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after data is updated. (Visa, MC, Discover, American Express, or pay from bank account) 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes 6- Click Continue RESUBMITTAL Submit the following documents to: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document For all NEW development package submittals on the Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW...". Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov (Disregard the automatic reply you will receive: "This email account is not...") |