Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0172
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/14/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/28/2020 | GDAURIA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | * Fire sprinklers required. * Show fire underground on plan. |
| 10/06/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide Case # DP20-0172 on each sheet. 4.2 Proposed Landscape and Screening Improvements Landscape plans submitted for review do not necessarily have to be complete working drawings ready for contractual work. However, all required landscaping and screening will be clearly shown in sufficient detail as to readily convey the intent to comply. Plans will include a planting plan, an irrigation plan, a grading plan, and construction details, each with applicable legend, key, symbols, sizes, quantities, and notes. The following information must be provided on the plans. Information may be combined on one sheet if the combination of information does not obscure other details. A. Planting Plan Ultimate size of plants indicated by the spread of canopy, circumference of shrubs, or spread of ground cover; Graphically show the canopy size of trees at full growth. B. Irrigation Plan 1. Type of water conserving irrigation systems proposed and differentiation between systems for the different water use zones on the site; 2. Source of irrigation water; 3. Indicate potable or reclaimed water use. Reclaimed water system specifications, if used; 4. System specifications and system design and layout (Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual); 5. Extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area, provided by water harvesting methods; 6. Point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow; 7. Temporary systems proposed to establish native seeded areas; 8. The length of irrigation duration (e.g., for native plat material, automatic drip for two years or until established); and, 9. The extent to which systems are proposed within the public right-of-way. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 10/09/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Section Manager PROJECT: Tabernacle Emanuel Church – Accessory Building Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0172 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 9, 2020 DUE DATE: October 7, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 08, 2021. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the phone number and email address for the property owner. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP20-0172, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the following case number(s), DP17-0275, DP13-0196, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – Provide the zonings for the entire site. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The use specific standards list for the existing religious use is not correct and should be removed from the plan. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The use specific standards list for the proposed religious use is not correct and should be listed as 4.9.13.K. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.6 AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ).” 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building and site area expansion calculation on the plan. As the parcels have been combined this includes the existing religious use, multifamily and proposed religious use. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – As the parcels have been combined remove the west property line from sheets 1 & 3 and provide the overall perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, together with distances in feet for the entire site on sheet 2 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – If applicable show all existing easements and their recordation information on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said some type of barrier is required around the entire access lane/parking area access lane to prevent vehicles from access the unimproved portions of the site. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Revise the “VAN/HC PARKING SPACE” detail to include the access aisle. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a –Sheet 2 “PARKING CALCULAITONS” “AREA B” complete the calculation. It does not appear that the vehicle parking ratio used is correct. Per UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings - 0-70 units/acre, Two Bedrooms units require 2.00 spaces per dwelling unit and Three Bedrooms units require 2.25 spaces per dwelling unit 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Sheet 2 “PARKING CALCULAITONS” “AREA B” it does not appear that the vehicle parking ratio used is correct. Per UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings - 0-70 units/acre, Two Bedrooms units require 2.00 spaces per dwelling unit and Three Bedrooms units require 2.25 spaces per dwelling unit 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Sheet 2 “PARKING CALCULAITONS” “AREA C” it does not appear that the vehicle parking ratio used is correct. Per UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings - 0-70 units/acre, Two Bedrooms units require 2.00 spaces per dwelling unit and Three Bedrooms units require 2.25 spaces per dwelling unit 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clarify what the proposed “ACCESSORY USE” will be use for. If religious service is proposed than the required vehicle parking will need to be provided, over and above what is required for Area A. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Short– and Long-term bicycle parking shall be provided for this building based on the requirements of UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide perimeter yard setback dimension on the plan. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Until the height of the exterior walls is provide perimeter yard setback requirements cannot be verified. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – As this site is located within the Tucson International Airport Hazard District provide the height of the proposed building as measured from the mean sea level (MSL) elevation at the end of the runway to a point specified in Section 6.4.4, Heigh, see UDC Article 5.6.11 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As the parcels have been combined per TSM Section 7-01.3.3 a sidewalk must connect all buildings on the site. That said provide a sidewalk connection from the proposed building to the multifamily units onsite. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Zoning recommends that the ramped sidewalk shown east of the proposed accessible vehicle parking spaces be at grade the entire length between the access aisles. The up a ramp and down a ramp creates a hardship for someone in a wheelchair. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Fully dimension the ramp details on sheet 4. 27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate on the ramp details how the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 404.2.3.2 and Figure 404.2.3.2 are met. 28. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Demonstrate on the ramp details how the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 505 are met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/12/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Verify that the FFE is at least 12" above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/30/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The drainage report indicates there is a solid wall along the west boundary of this project site. Provide reference to the approved permits showing the walls without drainage opening. Since the apartment sites were constructed with Floodplain Use Permits the encroachment analysis of the site must presume the wall is part of this project. 2. Show existing and proposed water surface contours at several representative locations. The distance between water surface contours should not be greater than 200 feet. Since the one at the building is required, also provide a water surface contour at the upstream side of the property and the downstream side of the project area and at representative locations at the apartments. (AM 2-06.4.8.I) 3. Provide a barrier on the edge of the driveway to prevent vehicles from driving into undeveloped parts of the property. (UDC 7.4.6.H) 4. Show drainage patterns including roof drainage directions on the plans. Demonstrate the sidewalks will be kept flood free for up to a 10-year event. Loren Makus Loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/02/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: November 2, 2020 RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Steps: Resubmittal of your updated/corrected documents IMPORTANT: On the Filedrop page, select the box: "Site Review/CDRC..." when sending your next submittal. DESCRIPTION: SITE - Tabernaculo Emanuel Church, accessory building, parking. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0172 FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document YOUR NEXT STEP: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Name the 2nd submittal documents starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set IMPORTANT: On the Filedrop page, select the box: "Site Review/CDRC..." when sending your next submittal. Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |