Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0072
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/27/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/29/2020 | GDAURIA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/29/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The development package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide Case # DP20-0072 on each sheet. 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 7.6.2. APPLICABILITY Buildings Greater Than 10,000 Square Feet On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than 10,000 square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows: a. If the expansion is less than 25%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. b. If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site. Provide expansion calculation. 7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS Located on Site Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. Provide written approval from TDOT for use of the ROW Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 05/04/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Section Manager PROJECT: Silver Street Warehouse - 3 Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0072 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 4, 2020 DUE DATE: May 6, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 07, 2021. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.3.12 - Revise the "SHEET INDEX" to reflect all four (4) sheets that were submitted. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP20-0072, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. 2-06.4.4.A - Does not appear that "THIS PROJECT" is pointing to the correct location and should be moved 1 block east. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. 2-06.4.7.A.1 - The existing zoning listed under "GENERAL NOTES" is not correct and should be listed as C-2. 5. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Under "GENERAL NOTES" the proposed use should be listed as "COMMERCIAL STORAGE". 6. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Under the "PROPOSED USE" you list "WAREHOUSE STORAGE" but under the "PARKING" you list a parking ratio of 1 space per 5000 and 1 space per 300 sq. ft. of gfa. It appears that you are proposing both a storage use and office use. If this is the case revise the proposed use to reflect this. If the 1 to 300 is office for the commercial storage then it is all parked at 1 space per 5000 sq. ft. of gfa 7. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - COMMENT: Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE (GCZ) UDC" 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Remove all references to "LOT COVERAGE" from the plan as it is not applicable. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 9. 2-06.4.8.C - Provide the following information for Oracle Rd, right-of-way width, and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 10. 2-06.4.9.F - Provide the zoning for the property east of Oracle Rd. 11. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show the required sight visibility triangles on the plan. 12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide the "B" space width for the propose typical vehicle parking spaces. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide the "E" curb length for the propose typical vehicle parking spaces. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The provided "C" Space depth does not meet the requirements of UDC Table 7.4.6-1 and should be 19'-0". Either revised the space depth to meet the requirement of a Parking Area Modification Request (PDMR) will need to be submitted and approved prior to approval of the DP. If you elect to go the PDMR route if approved provide the PDMR Case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the PDMR case number, date of approval, what was modified, and if applicable any conditions of approval. 15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a location dimension for the proposed wheel stops, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. 16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Clearly demonstrate that the location of the proposed accessible parking sign does not encroach into the 2'-6" vehicle overhang. 17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show the proposed location for the long-term bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B & .D are met. 18. 2-06.4.9.J - As Oracle Rd is shown on the Major Streets and Routes Map as having a future right-of-way (ROW) of 150' or a ½ ROW of 75' and it appears that Oracle Rd is not at full width show the location of the future ROW line and curb and sidewalk location. 19. 2-06.4.9.O - The side street perimeter yard setback is not correct and should be 21' or the height of the exterior wall, greater of the two, measured to the nearest edge of travel lane along Plata & Thirteenth. 20. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the height of the existing and proposed building within the footprint. 21. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. That said provide the required sidewalk out to Oracle. 22. 2-06.4.9.R - There is a tree well shown approximately midway along the northern parking area. Just to the north is a darker hatched area that appears to be pavement. Clarify what this area is. 23. 2-06.4.9.W - If applicable indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Add a general note stating "ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT". If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/04/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Technical Standard 8-01 requires enclosures to provide 10 feet of clear area between the bollards protecting the walls. 2. The solid waste enclosure is oriented to require the service vehicle to drive the wrong way on a one-way PAAL. This will require the PAAL to be designated as a 2-way PAAL with a 24-foot width. 3. Show drainage patterns, including roof drainage, for the site. Show how water harvesting will be maximized by directing flows toward landscape areas. |
| 05/08/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Step: Resubmittal of documents DESCRIPTION: SITE/GRADING - Silver Street Warehouse, new building. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0072 FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, left side, Activity Search, enter the Activity Number - Permits section, click on blue tab - Reviews section, click on Review Details - Documents section, click on blue icon to the right of each document YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit to the Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Name the 2nd submittal documents starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set CONTACT US Monday-Friday, 8:00 am to 12:00 noon https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/virtual-service-counter For information or an over-the-counter review, sign in to the Virtual Service Counter and we will give you a call. Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 05/08/2020 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Needs Review | Waiting for payment to Addressing before review can be started. Invoice was issued to applicant on April 7 by Pima County Addressing. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/08/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |