Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP18-0293
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/20/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/13/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/13/2019 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/13/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Single Family Development - Subdivision Development Package (1st Review) - 6395 E CAMINO BOLEADORAS DP18-0293 - PAD 7 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 13, 2019 DUE DATE: March 18, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 10, 2019. *** Please address the 4 follow up comments and re-submit for review. 1. Follow up to previous comment 4: It does not appear that the information for the registrant sealing sheets 17 and 18 was listed on the cover sheet. Please list Michael J. Wilda's information. 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. Include the following information and be provided on each sheet: Previous Comment 4: List the information for each registrant that assisted in preparing this development package. The information for each registrant shall be listed as noted by the standard above. 2. Follow up to previous comment 5: The case numbers DP17-0254 and DP14-0126 were not listed in the title block of sheets 6 through 18. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: Previous Comment 5: The title block on the landscape sheets shall either be added to match the civil sheets title block or the title block on the landscape sheets shall include the exact information as provided on the DP civil sheets. Revise the as required. 3. Follow up to previous comment 15: The two lot detail drawings do not address the full street setback requirements for this development. Add a dimension that states the minimum interior street building setback is the greatest of 21 feet or the height; it should also be noted from the nearest edge of travel lane with and without the parking lanes. Also, the detail drawings only address the lots that have a parking lane along the front street perimeter. Revise the two lot typical detail drawings or add 2 additional drawings demonstrating the street building setbacks for lots without a parking lane in the street frontage. Also, for ease of plan review staff processing building applications at the counter, annotate on sheets 2 and 3 the street side with the parking lanes. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. Previous Comment 15: List the required building street and interior building setbacks. Typical lot details with the building setbacks can be included to provide the building setback information. 4. New Comment: A subdivision application has been submitted for review and has been assigned the case number S19-012. List the subdivision case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/15/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide the development package and any other case numbers adjacent to the title block on each sheet. (see zoning comments 2 & 4) Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed. Once zoning comments have been addressed, an over the counter review and approval by landscape section can be arranged. |
| 03/18/2019 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | **The PDF attachment mentioned here can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section** DP18-0293, La Estancia, Block 26 / 2nd Submittal is being Conditionally Approved by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 03/20/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Lots 3 (FFE 2797.37), 4 (FFE 2797.42), and 5 (FFE 2797.67) are less than 12" above the next upstream manhole (SSMH11, Rim 2796.88) and require backwater valves. Lots 16 (FFE 2799.22), 17 (FFE 2798.94), 18 (FFE 2798.97), and 5 (FFE 2798.97) are less than 12" above the next upstream manhole (SSMH 7, Rim 2798.25) and also require backwater valves. [Initial comment: Revise the site drawings to indicate for which lots backwater valves will be required because the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12" below the proposed first floor elevations. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 03/21/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/28/2019 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. -- Tom J. Martinez |
| 03/28/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plans Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0293 Project Description: E TENTATIVE PLAT - LA ESTANCIA DE TUCSON, BLOCK 26, proposed lots 1-47 The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required. To see review comments about the plans, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by activity number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, please check back later as data flows to PRO at periodic intervals throughout the day.) Prepare a Comment Response Letter for the reviewers detailing what changes have been made to the plan and what review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made to the plans, please submit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd:1) Comment Response Letter 2) Corrected plan set 3) Items requested by review staff The plans will then re-enter the 20 working day review cycle.Please type the activity number in the Project Description and name the files as described on the PDSD Filedrop web page. The current fee balance is $0. Steve Shields, copied, is the Project Manager to contact with any questions, email: Steve.Shields@TucsonAz.gov or phone (520) 837-4956. Alexandra Hines City of Tucson Planning and Development Svcs. Dept. 201 N. Stone Ave, 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2019 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |