Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP18-0293
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2019 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | January 8, 2019 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP18-0293 PROJECT NAME: La Estancia Block 26 Lots 1-47 PROJECT ADDRESS: 6395 E Camino Boleadoras PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised and added to the Development package. 1. Extend 6 foot sidewalk on Kolb Road along frontage of property. Show on plan 2. At time of construction a private improvement agreement (PIA) will be required for work within the right of way. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/08/2019 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Reqs Change | 1/08/19 email: Regional Traffic Engineering has a comment on this submittal. After reviewing the submitted package; were there any Traffic Engineering documents included in the development package or were there any requested by the City of Tucson/Development Services? If any were submitted, Regional Traffic would like the opportunity to review and comment on the document. Please note the development lies approximately a half mile from the Kolb Road interchange and Interstate 10 and may impact its operation. Thank you Tom Martinez ADOT TMartinez@azdot.gov |
| 01/09/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | January 9, 2019 Sharon Beasley City of Tucson Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: DP18-0293 La Estancia, Block 26 / 1st Submittal, Received December 12, 2018 Dear Ms. Beasley, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0293, La Estancia, Block 26; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 9.1 acre site, located northwest of the intersection of East Camino Boleadoras and South Kolb Road. The property is zoned Planned Area Development 7 (PAD-7) and the proposed development are new single family homes.This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority is satisfied with the applicant's first project submittal and has no additional comments to submit. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Phone 520-573-8100 Direct 520-573-4811 www.flytucson.com |
| 01/10/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments |
| 01/10/2019 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/10/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Single Family Development - Subdivision Development Package (1st Review) - 6395 E CAMINO BOLEADORAS DP18-0293 - PAD 7 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 10, 2019 DUE DATE: January 11, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 10, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. 1. COMMENT: The address block is only required on the cover sheet. The address block on sheets 2 and 3 can be removed. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Label the contour interval used on sheet 2 and 3. 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 3. COMMENT: All Civil and landscape sheet shall be incorporated into one set. The DP sheet and landscape sheets shall be renumbered in numerical order. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. Include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 4. COMMENT: List the information for each registrant that assisted in preparing this development package. The information for each registrant shall be listed as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 5. COMMENT: The title block on the landscape sheets shall either be added to match the civil sheets title block or the title block on the landscape sheets shall include the exact information as provided on the DP civil sheets. Revise the as required. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 6. COMMENT: As noted in comment 3 the sheets shall be renumbered in numerical order and shall include all civil and landscape sheets. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 7. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0293, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. List the administrative address next to the title block of the sheets 2 -5 of the civil sheets. 2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 8. COMMENT: Provide the reduced-scale map of the PAD on the cover sheet as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." 9. COMMENT: Add the zoning note as noted by the standard above, "Existing Zoning Is PAD 7". 2-06.4.7.A.5 - On residential projects, list the total number of units/lots proposed. 10. COMMENT: Include in general note 3 a density calculation. Also, clarify what is an "A" lot? 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 11. COMMENT: Revise general note 26 to include a statement that project is with the David Monthan NCD-A overlay and Avigation Easement and has been or will be designed to comply with the AEZ regulations of UDC 5.6. This area is within the Airport Avigation easement. A review by Scott Robidoux Airport Planner is required. Contact Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 or Phone 520-573-8100 Direct 520-573-4811 or srobidoux@flytucson.com for more information on the Avigation easement requirements. Include in general note 33 that this project has been designed to comply with the regulations UDC Section 5.4 MSR regulations. 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. 12. COMMENT: List the lots affected by the NCD-A overlay. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 13. COMMENT: Label the adjacent zoning classifications on sheets 2 and 3 including across Kolb Road. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 14. COMMENT: Indicate by note the number of visitor parking spaces required and provided. Also list the number of spaces required and provided per lot for the residential development. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 15. COMMENT: List the required building street and interior building setbacks. Typical lot details with the building setbacks can be included to provide the building setback information. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 16. COMMENT: List the proposed building heights of the residential units. Use the tallest as a maximum height. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 17. COMMENT: Add a general note stating what the maximum cross and longitudinal slopes will be for all interior street sidewalks. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 18. COMMENT: Clarify if gang mailboxes will be used for this development or will mail be provided to each residence? Add a note for the proposed mail service. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 19. COMMENT: Clarify if any free standing monument signage is proposed? 20. COMMENT: Add a general note that states that the Estancia DRC will review all residential plans before submittal to PDSD for review and approval. Plans shall be stamped by the estancia DRC prior to submittal to PDSD for review. 21. COMMENT: "This subdivision (Residential Development will be) have to be designed to comply with the Inclusive Home Design Ordinance, City of Tucson Ordinance 104631" If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/11/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. All Civil and landscape sheet shall be incorporated into one set. The DP sheet and landscape sheets shall be renumbered in numerical order. Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions and objectives of PAD-7 document. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: C. Open Space and Recreation Plan D. Landscape Plan requirements Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 01/14/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawings to indicate for which lots backwater valves will be required because the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12" below the proposed first floor elevations. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 01/15/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | DP18-0293 1) Sheet 2: Adjust the near side sight visibility triangle at the intersection of Street A and E Camino Boleadoras to be in line with figure 18 of the City of Tucson (COT) Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 10-01 2) Sheet 5: Detail G says "SEE PVMT. STRUCTURAL SECTION THIS SHEET". No pavement cross section is provided. Add pavement cross section to plans 3) Per City of Tucson Technical Standard Manual (TSM) section 10-01.3.3 B, provide a continuous 6' wide sidewalk along S Kolb Rd along the entire property frontage 4) Sheet 5. Detail G, the arrow leader for the sidewalk does not point to the sidewalk. Adjust leader as needed 5) Pima Associations of Governments "PAG" standard details have been adopted to replace City of Tucson Standard Details. Update notes/details on all sheets to reference the appropriate "PAG" standards. See following link http://apps.pagnet.org/standardspecifications/ 6) The La Estancia Master Drainage Study, Castro Engineering job # LAEST001, indicates that the proposed 100 year discharge from block 26 to be 80 cfs. This proposal indicates a discharge of 90cfs. Please explain the difference and if it is acceptable to the overall La Estancia Drainage scheme John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 01/16/2019 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Tentative Plat submitted on 12-12-18. In order for TEP to prepare a preliminary electrical design, please submit a copy of the Approved Tentative Plat to mburke@tep.com. If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke, Right of Way Agent III Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources - RC 131 3950 E. Irvington Road Tucson, AZ 85714-2114 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 01/16/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plans Returned for Corrections Notice Activity Number: DP18-0293 Project Description: E TENTATIVE PLAT - LA ESTANCIA DE TUCSON, BLOCK 26 PROPOSED LOTS 1-47 AND COMMON AREA "A" (PARK/OPEN SPACE) AND COMMON AREA "B" (DRAINAGE/UTILITIES) The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required. To see review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) Prepare a Comment Response Letter detailing changes to the plan and which review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made, go to the PDSD Filedrop web page. Please enter the Activity Number in the “Project Description” field and name the files as directed, for example, second (2nd) submittal: 2_Plan_Set.pdf Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. The plans will then re-enter a 20-working-day review cycle. 1) Comment Response Letter 2) Corrected plan set with all documents 3) Items requested by review staff The current fee balance is $0 (zero). Steve Shields, copied, is the Project Manager to contact with any questions, email: Steve.Shields@TucsonAz.gov or phone: (520) 837-4956. Thank you. Sharon Beasley City of Tucson Planning and Development Services 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
| 12/12/2018 | AHINES2 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | Water availability provided on 10/10/18. |
| 12/12/2018 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Agency notified as an FYI only. |
| 12/12/2018 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | SW Gas notified as an FYI only. |
| 12/12/2018 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/12/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | PAG - PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 12/13/2018 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/26/2018 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | **PDF attachment can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section** DP18-0293, La Estancia, Block 26 / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing's comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV - 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/16/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |