Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP18-0274
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/19/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/19/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 11/19/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 11/19/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 11/20/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Please indicate on plans No Parking-Fire Lane signs on Jacqueline Pl and ends of hammerhead tee. |
| 11/23/2018 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | November 14, 2018 Cypress Civil Development, LLC 2030 E. Speedway Blvd. #110 Tucson, AZ 85719 Attn: Theresa Hadley SUBJECT: Water Availability for Project: 8211 E. Lee Street , APN: 13309007D, Case #: WA2653 , T-14 R-15 S-04 , Lots: 9999 , Location Code: TUC , Total Area: 2.38 , Zoning: RX-1 WATER SUPPLY Tucson Water will provide water service to this project based on the subject zoning of the above parcels. Tucson Water has an assured water supply (AWS) designated from the State of Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). An AWS designation means Tucson Water has met the criteria established by ADWR for demonstration of a 100-year water supply - it does not mean that water service is currently available to the subject project. WATER SERVICE The approval of water meter applications is subject to the current availability of water service at the time an application is received. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying, but not limited to: 1) Water Use; 2) Fire Flow Requirements; 3) Offsite/Onsite Water Facilities; 4) Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System; and 5) Easements/Common Areas. Any specific area plan fees, protected main/facility fees and/or other needed facilities' cost, are to be paid by the developer. If the existing water system is not capable of meeting the requirements of the proposed development, the developer shall be financially responsible for modifying or enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs. This letter shall be null and void two years from the date of issuance. Issuance of this letter is not to be construed as agency approval of a water plan or as containing construction review comments relative to conflicts with existing water lines and the proposed development. If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718. Sincerely, Michael Mourreale, P.E. Engineering Manager Tucson Water Department MM:ka CC:13309007D.docx |
| 12/03/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 12/05/2018 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | **ATTACHMENT CAN BE VIEWED IN DOCUMENTS TABLE IN PRO** 12/05/18 DP18-0274 4C Shalom Subdivision / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing's comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV - 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 12/06/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/06/2018 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | 12/06/18 No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/06/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 4C Shalom Subdivision - Lots 1 -12 Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0274 - RX-1/ Proposed R-1 zoning Per Rezoning Case C9-18-19 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 06, 2018 DUE DATE: December 11, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 09, 2019. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.C - The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. If the subdivision is a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), a condominium, or a similar type of residential subdivision utilizing special provisions of the UDC, it shall be so noted; 1. COMMENT: List the number of lots in the title block. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0274, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 3. COMMENT: List the assigned rezoning case number C9-18-19 in general note 2 of the cover sheet. Reference the rezoning case number next to the title block of al plan sheets. List the rezoning conditions on the dp cover sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 4. COMMENT: List the following Use Specific Standards; R-1: For 1 unit, 4.9.7.B.5 - 9; for 2 units (min. 10,000 sf lot size required), 4.9.7.B.1 - .9, & .11 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; 5. COMMENT: List on the cover sheet building and vehicle use area square footage used to calculate the lot coverage. If using a typical building GFA, the largest building SF should be used if multiple models are proposed. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 6. COMMENT: The interior street must be designed wide enough to provide visitor parking on both sides. The required street cross section for an ADT of 0 to 1,000 requires two ten-foot travel lanes and two 7-foot wide parking lanes one each side of the street with vertical curbs. (On-street parking is not allowed on Lee Street.) The proposed cross section can be used when parking is provided at a ratio of 1 space per dwelling in a common area. This project has not been designed with visitor parking. See UDC section 7.4.6.B.2.a - .c for options that may be used and could still require a TSMR approval. Contact Steve Shields to discuss the options mention in the section noted above. Include a visitor parking calculation with the number required and number provided. (Tandem parking spaces for visitors are not counted towards the requirement.) 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 7. COMMENT: The street building setbacks are based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure measured from the nearest edge of travel lane of the interior street and from Lee Street. Revise the street building setback as noted above. Add an additional building setback for the interior lot setbacks, the greatest of 6 feet or 2/3 height. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 8. COMMENT: Submit a separate response memo stating how the conditions have been addressed. Be aware that additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal on this item. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/10/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements for the entire site In accordance with Section 2-10.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS Street Landscape Borders Residential Subdivisions Street landscape borders for residential subdivisions of eight or more lots shall conform to the following standards. (1) Street landscape borders are only required along the exterior boundaries of subdivisions. Landscape borders are not required along front yard street frontages. (2) Walls, fences, or other screening must be placed behind the landscape border. (3) The landscape border must be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA) for the subdivision. The subdivision CC&Rs shall reference and require compliance with the maintenance standards in Section 7.6.8, Maintenance. The PDSD Director may allow the recording of a public use easement with the subdivision plat in cases where the standards of this section are the only reason for the creation of an HOA. The public use easement shall require the abutting property owner to install and maintain a landscape border in accordance with the standards in this section. (4) Street landscape borders fronting on local streets may be reduced to a minimum of five feet. Interior Landscape Borders Interior landscape borders are required as a buffer and visual transition along the common property lines between adjacent land uses and zones as follows, except as provided in Section 7.6.4.C.4, Exceptions to the Landscape Border Standards. 7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 12/10/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0274 1) Per Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual section 3.4.2 provide a grade control marker for each proposed basin. On the plans please also provide the coordinates of the grade control markers so that they can be easily located in the future 2) Reference City of Tucson (C0T) Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, include all applicable drainage maintenance responsibility notes found in section 14.3 3) Existing drainage outlet from development on the south side of E Lee St appears to discharge north across E Lee St into the proposed project. Show on plans additional existing condition spot grades to support the assumption in the drainage report that water flows west along E Lee St and not north through the proposed project. 4) COT Unified Development Code (UDC) section 7.11.1 states that detention and retention basins shall be located in a common area, outside of a residential lot, located within the perimeter wall or fence. Revise as needed to show the proposed retentions in dedicated common area. John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 12/14/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/14/2018 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Reqs Change | Concurrent with C9-18-19, provide preliminary rezoning conditions. |
| 12/19/2018 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Activity Number: DP18-0274 Address: 8211 E Lee St Zoning: RX-1 Proposed Use: Single Family Residential Due Date: Monday, December 10, 2018 Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Development Package/Tentative Plat submitted for review on November 19, 2018. Costs for the relocation or removal of existing TEP facilities will be billable to the owner/developer. In order for an electrical design to be completed, please provide a copy of the Approved Tentative Plat and the subdivision AutoCAD file to mburke@tep.com<mailto:mburke@tep.com>. Easements for TEP facilities must be shown on the Final Plat before TEP can approve the plat. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 918-8205. Thank you, Courtney Tejeda Right of Way Agent Land Resources Dept. RC131 Tucson Electric Power Co. 3950 E. Irvington Rd., Tucson, AZ 85714 |
| 12/19/2018 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plans Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0274 Project Description: E PLAT/GRADE/SWPPP - 4C SHALOM The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required. To see review comments about the plans, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by activity number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) Prepare a Comment Response Letter detailing changes to the plan and which review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made to the plans, type the activity number in the Project Description and name the files as described on the PDSD Filedrop web page. Submit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. The plans will then re-enter a 20-working-day review cycle. 1) Comment Response Letter 2) Corrected plan set with all documents 3) Items requested by review staff The current fee balance is $0 (zero). Maria Gayosso, copied, is the Project Manager to contact with any questions: (520) 837-6972 or Maria.Gayosso@TucsonAz.gov. Thank you. Sharon Beasley City of Tucson Planning and Development Svcs. Dept. 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/19/2018 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |