Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0245
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/03/2018 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 10/03/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 10/03/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 10/03/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 10/05/2018 | NROSS1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | October 4, 2018 Alexandra Hines Lead Planner City of Tucson Public Works Buildings – 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: DP18-0245 The Bridges 150K SF Office / 1st Submittal, Received October 3, 2018 Dear Ms. Hines, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0245, The Bridges 150K SF Office; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 10.49 acre site, located south of the intersection of East 36th Street and South M L King Jr Way. The land use is PAD 15 (Planned Area Development 15) with the proposed development being an office use. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority has noticed two Tucson Airport Authority general notes, which would have been requested for this project submittal, have already been included on the general notes of the submitted plan. The Tucson Airport Authority is satisfied with the 1st submittal of this project and has no additional comments to submit. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner |
| 10/23/2018 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | INSTALLATION OF FIRE SERVICE UNDERGROUND SHALL CONFORM TO NFPA 13. Deferred submittal shall be supplied to TFD for Sprinklers |
| 10/25/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 10/30/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; PAD f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of the revised PAD. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 10/31/2018 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/01/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Lead Planner PROJECT: The Bridges 150K SF Office, 2810 S MLK Jr. Way Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0245 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 31, 2018 DUE DATE: October 31, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is October 2, 2019. 1. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. Revise landscape sheets to include this information in the upper right corner. 2. 2-06.4.3 - Include the assigned case number DP18-0245 adjacent to the title block. 3. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Amend general note 3 on sheet 1 to identify the proposed use of the property as Administrative and Professional Office. 4. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide PAAL width for the access lane to the north of the match line between sheets 5 and 6. 5. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Clarify location of the two type A loading zones. 6. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building. 7. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 8. Once the comments in this transmittal have been addressed and a new submittal received, please contact me if you wish to complete an expedited over-the-counter review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/01/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/01/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | For the building sewer on the southeast portion of the building, the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (MH #9, 2475.31') is more than 12" below the first floor elevation (2477.40'). Do not provide a backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 11/02/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0245 1) Hydro report page 4 indicates that overflow drains in the water harvesting basins along the western edge of the property are 4" above the basin floors. Corresponding details on plan set sheet 7-8 indicate that basins 1-5 have a ponding depth is 9". Clarify if the inlets for the overflow drains allow for 9" of ponding depth or if ponding depth would be limited to 4" prior to entering the overflow drains 2) Provide top/bottom spot grades for all proposed water harvesting areas to show the effective ponding depth is maintained. Provide spot grades at the bottom of each inlet in addition to the spot grades shown at the top of the inlet as currently shown 3) Sheet 7 says to reference sheet 8 for pipe connection details. No details are shown on sheet 8. Provide a detail of the pipe connection to the existing catch basins, including method for basin cut-out and new pipe collar dowels or other joints. Similar to detail provided on Geico project. Pima County Regional Flood Control requests an inspection of this connection prior to final inspection or certificate of occupancy 4) Landscaping plans show several locations where tree trunks are out of line with parking stripes. Since this could interfere with the required vehicle overhang, adjust trunk locations so that they are shown as being in line with the parking stripes John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 11/05/2018 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Reqs Change | Entitlements Section John Beall 1. Applicant to provide letter of recommendation from DRC. |
| 11/06/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0245 Project Description: E SITE/GRADE/SWPPP - THE BRIDGES 150K SF OFFICE To see review comments about the plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search and enter activity number above. This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle: 1) Corrected plan set 2) Items requested by review staff Please type the activity number in Project Description or Message of PDSD Filedrop for resubmittal. Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal, 2_plan_set.pdf 2_response_letter.pdf The balance is $6143.10. Review fees must be paid prior to 2nd submittal review. Alexandra Hines |
| 11/06/2018 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Reqs Change | Regional Traffic Engineering has a question inquiring if there has been any updated data to the approved traffic documents and any additional impacts to the existing roadway network? Please include any traffic documents in the next submittal or a response ADOT’s concerns. The proposed square footage of the development may affect the operations of the I-10 ramps adjacent to the overall site. Thank you Tom Martinez <TMartinez@azdot.gov> |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/06/2018 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |