Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0225
Parcel: 14025008A

Address:
5761 S PARK AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP18-0225
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/12/2018 KELLY LEE START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/20/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change ***View attachment in documents table on PRO.***

DP18-0225 RIO MERCADO PARK APTS/ 1ST SUBMITTAL is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.

Please see the attached pdf for Addressing’s comments.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
10/02/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Rio Mercado-Park Apartments - 5761 S. Park Avenue
Development Package (1st Review) - Multi-Family Development
DP18-0225 - C-1/C-2

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 2, 2018
DUE DATE: October 10, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 10, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0225, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

Sheets 5 through 10 do not have the same site address as sheets 1 through 4. All sheets must include the same administrative address. Revise all sheets to include the correct administrative address.


2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

2. COMMENT: On the location map label Bilby Road and Milton Road which abuts the project site along the south of the development.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.


2-06.4.7.A.5 - On residential projects, list the total number of units/lots proposed.

3. COMMENT: List the total number of units per building. Clarify if there is a Clubhouse for the tenants use and if so list the structure and square footage of the structure.


2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

4. COMMENT: If there is a clubhouse list the square footage and building number as a general note or include it in general note 5.


2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

5. COMMENT: If applicable, add the easement information as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

6. COMMENT: Include any curb and sidewalk information and dimensions along Milton Road if required by the PDSD Engineering reviewer.



2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes.
Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width.
Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information.

2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

7. COMMENT: Whether street dedication is required or proposed the project drawing appears to include detail drawings of the future right of way conditions along the Drexel Road and Park Avenue frontages. If right of way dedication is not required or proposed at this time, an site additional drawing that represents the future conditions of the development site as it relates to Drexel and Park frontages including landscape requirements must be included in the package and a recorded MS&R Covenant will be required or the site can be designed to meet the future right of way conditions.


2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

8. COMMENT: If applicable include the information as noted in the standard above.


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

9. COMMENT: For setback reference draw and label the future curb location for Drexel and Park on sheets 2 and 3.


2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

10. COMMENT: Label the Clubhouse building, square footage and height within the footprint.

Label the heights of the 1 story structures. (If available include as reference building plan elevations with height dimensions.)


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

11. COMMENT: The slopes for the sidewalks could not be verified. Label the cross and horizontal slopes for the sidewalk system.


12. COMMENT: Be aware that additional zoning review comments may be forthcoming based on responses to the zoning comments from the first review and changes to the plans.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
10/02/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning review comments.
10/02/2018 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Keynote 33 on sheet 2 indicates "new fire hydrant". Unable to locate. Please clarify.
Please indicate proposed location of fire sprinkler underground supply line.
10/03/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change Unified Development Code
ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
Street Landscape Borders

Minimum Width

Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border must be measured from the future MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Section 5.4.4, Establishment of MS&R Right-of-Way Lines and Gateway Routes.

Portions of the street landscape border on Drexel are not 10' wide. Dimension landscape buffers and revise as necessary to comply with minimum width standards.

Located on Site

Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets.

If ROW permission cannot be granted for use of required landscaping the following applies:

An approved site plan is required indicating how the project will comply with UDC standards when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan shall be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the UDC at no cost to the City.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed.

Additional comments may apply.
10/03/2018 NROSS1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Approv-Cond October 2, 2018

Kelly Lee
Lead Planner
City of Tucson
Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ. 85701

RE: DP18-0225 Rio Mercado Park Apts / 1st Submittal, Received September 12, 2018

Dear Ms. Lee,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0225, Rio Mercado Park Apts; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 5.04 acre site, located northeast of the intersection of East Milton Road and South Park Avenue. The land use is commercial with the proposed development being multifamily dwelling units.

This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.

The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following conditions of approval, as noted below. These conditions shall be identified in the general notes of the revised development plan.

Condition of approval:

1. "According to the FAA Notice Criteria Tool, this project is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the project. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes used which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp"

2. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."

The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below.

Scott Robidoux
Senior Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

3. "The developer shall provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units, but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit shall be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."

The new property owner or new tenant shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority, using the mailing address provided below.

Scott Robidoux
Senior Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,


Scott Robidoux,
Senior Airport Planner

cc file
10/05/2018 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP18-0225

This project was reviewed only as a Site Development Package, as indicated on the application. A separate grading review will be required.
1. Provide a complete drainage report. The site is within a balanced basin. Provide 5-year threshold retention and balanced basin detention. Include an evaluation of the soils and infiltration characteristics.
2. Add to the solid waste calculation that a minimum of 45 gallons per dwelling unit must be provided between scheduled service times. For 89 units, 20 cubic yards of capacity are required. Tucson Code 15-10.1(E).
3. The total building GFA in the notes doesn't match the sum of the GFAs listed in the plan view. Please reconcile the numbers.
4. Since Drexel is a MS&R collector, provide 6-foot sidewalks along Drexel Road. (TSM 10-01.4.1.A.1.a)
5. Drexel has a proposed width of 100 feet. Park Avenue has a proposed width of 120 feet. The intersection of Park and Drexel requires intersection widening. Show the future right-of-way on all applicable plan sheets. (AM 2-06.4.9.J)
6. Show Sight Visibility Triangles for all adjacent street intersections such as Drexel Road and Jeanette Boulevard.
7. Clearly label adjacent catch basins on all applicable plan sheets.
8. Justify connection to street storm drain system. TDOT usually requires a manhole at the property line for these types of connections. Contact Richard Leigh in TDOT Permits and Codes.
9. Provide curb and sidewalk along the Milton Road frontage. (TS 10-01.3.2 and TS 10-01.3.3.B)
10. Clearly show how run-off is directed to landscape areas to the maximum degree possible. (UDC 7.6.6.C.2)
11. Additional comment will be forthcoming once the drainage report is submitted
10/12/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Plan Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0225
Project Description: E SITE - RIO MERCADO - PARK APARTMENTS

To see review comments about the plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search and enter activity number above.

This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle:
1) Corrected plan set
2) Items requested by review staff

Please type the activity number in Project Description or Message of PDSD Filedrop for resubmittal. Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal,
2_plan_set.pdf
2_response_letter.pdf

The balance is $2,233.19. Review fees must be paid prior to 2nd submittal review.

Alexandra Hines, AICP
Lead Planner at Planning and Development Services, City of Tucson
201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 837-6975 - alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov
10/12/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information:
a. The location and size of water lines
b. The location and size of sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. The points of connection to existing public sewers.
d. The locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights.
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/12/2018 AHINES2 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed