Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0184
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/06/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/28/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE The landscape plan shall include the following: 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 1. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Minimum Width Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line. Streetscape Landscape Border - Maximum Width In situations where the street landscape border is wider than the minimum ten foot standard, the landscape border width needs to be determined for the purposes of calculating the 50% vegetative coverage standard. The width is that area between the required screen and the property line, unless there is permitted encroachment into the right-of-way as per this section. Vegetative Ground Cover Fifty percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two years from the date of planting. Provide the following Calculations: Square footage of all landscaped borders and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage Note: Trees are not included in the vegetative coverage calculation Located on Site Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee. Some landscaping is located in ROW. Use of the Public Right-of-Way Non-required landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following standards are met: 1. The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's standards on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type; All vegetation complies with the standards of Section 7.6.4, Landscaping Standards; and, The landscaping does not interfere with the use of the sidewalk. Provide permission for use of ROW. COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO) (UDC 3.11.1). 7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. A 5' wall is required to screen multifamily use from residential use properties. Screening Materials Walls All walls required by this section must be of masonry material or masonry with a stucco or textured finish. The applicant is proposing a 5' wrought iron fence with vegetative cover and trees to the East and South property lines. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 11/30/2018 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP18-0184 Encantada at Rita Ranch / 2nd Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 12/03/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | DP18-0184. December 3, 2018 Zelin Canchola The proposed development planned is acceptable. A private Improvement Agreement (PIA) with TDOT will be required for work in the right of way. |
| 12/04/2018 | MASHFOR1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | Per the International Fire Code - 903.2.8. An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3 shall be provided throughout all buildings with a Group R fire area. Per the International Fire Code -907.2.10.2 Groups R-2, R-3, R-4 and I-1- Single or multiple-station smoke alarms shall be installed and maintained in Group R-2 , R-3, R-4 and I-1 regardless of occupant load |
| 12/05/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0184 1) Include the water harvesting areas, and retention requirements in the drainage report not as separate documents. Provide additional narrative in the drainage report showing how the retention requirement is being met (similar to what is provided in the response letter). Provide a reference to the Infiltration study in the drainage report 2) Previous comment 10. The proposed access ramp is blocked by bollards, PAG standard detail 106. Update bollard reference to be PAG detail 107 which are removable 3) Engineering can conduct an expedited electronic review once the above comments have been addressed and a new work flow opened. Email to schedule John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 12/06/2018 | NICHOLAS ROSS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Nick Ross Lead Planner PROJECT: Encantada at Rita Ranch - 9300 E. Valencia Road Development Package (2nd Review) - Multi-Family Residential DP18-0184 - C-2 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 6, 2018 DUE DATE: December 4, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 30, 2019. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.9.F - Place all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) on coversheet. The wrong zoning classification is listed on the adjacent property to the west of the site. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Clarify if parking spaces will include covered parking. If so parking structures must be 1 foot offset from PAAL. The calculations and structural sheets need to be removed from the development package. A separate building permit will be required for the carports, separate from the development package. Please show dimensions and placement of structures on site plan. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - All long term bicycle parking must inside apartments or in long term bicycle parking lockers (revise long term note under Minimum Number of Bicycle Spaces). Provide fully dimensioned bicycle parking detail drawings. Long-term bicycle storage shall not be located in patio/porch of units. See Section 7.4.9.D.2 of UDC for required criteria. 2-06.4.9.L - If applicable provide dimensions of any proposed easements. All easements including utility easements must be shown on the development package for approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nick Ross at (520) 837-4029 or Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/10/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Buildings 1, 2, and 6 appear to have finish floor elevations that are less than 12" above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole. [Initial comment: Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 12/11/2018 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plans Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0184 Project Description: E SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - ENCANTADA AT RITA RANCH The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required. To see review comments about the plans, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by activity number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, please check back later as data flows to PRO at periodic intervals throughout the day.) Prepare a Comment Response Letter detailing changes to the plan and which review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made to the plans, submit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. The plans will then re-enter the 20-working-day review cycle. 1) Comment Response Letter 2) Corrected plan set 3) Items requested by review staff Please type the activity number in the Project Description and name the files as described on the PDSD Filedrop web page. The current fee balance is $165.00 (see image below). Review fees must be paid prior to the third submittal review. Thank you. Sharon Beasley City of Tucson Planning and Development Svcs. Dept. 201 N. Stone Ave., First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/11/2018 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |