Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0158
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2018 | KELLY LEE | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/17/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Please indicate on plans location of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants. Show dimensions to property lines. Refer to section 507 of the 2018 International Fire Code for guidance. |
| 07/20/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Unified Development Code 2-10.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Street Landscape Borders Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line and bound the site excluding ingress and egress. Some of the landscape borders do not extend the entire street length. A Design Development Option can be applied for if alternative landscape coverage can be achieved. If eliminating required landscaping a variance is required. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 07/24/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Lead Planner PROJECT: Warehouse, 1870 E. 18th St Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0158 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 24, 2018 DUE DATE: July 30, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 28, 2019. 1. 2-06.3.5 - As this is an electronic review, pleaser remove the development package PDSD approval stamp from the lower right and provide the required 3"x5" space on each sheet. The approval stamp will be inserted electronically. 2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP18-0158, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As a general note, list that this site is within the Tucson International Airport Avigation Easement and Disclosure Area and the Davis Monthan Air Force Base Vicinity. 4. 2-06.4.8.B - Verify all existing easements are drawn on the site plan. 5. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street shall be provided. Information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 6. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. 7. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all full dimensioned. 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Amend the site plan and typical parking space detail to show the accessible symbol on the parking space, not the access aisle. Accessible ramps must be provided to pedestrian circulation areas and the building. 10. 2-06.4.9.L - Verify all proposed easements are dimensioned and labeled on the plan. 11. 2-06.4.9.O - Include all applicable building setback lines. The setback along the 18th St frontage is 20' or 1.5 times the height, as measured from the property line. The setback along the Campbell Ave frontage is 10'. 12. 2-06.4.9.Q - Within the footprint of the proposed building, provide the square footage, height and specific use. Also, correct the general note on maximum building height. The maximum height in the I-1 zone is 75'. 13. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. All pedestrian circulation areas must include an accessible route in compliance with building codes. Accessible ramps must be provided between sidewalks and pedestrian refuge locations. 14. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. Verify street design standards and requirements with Tucson Department of Transportation. 15. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 16. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/24/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments. |
| 07/25/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show the location of the reduced pressure backflow preventer on the site plan. Reference: Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-76 (a), Tucson Code. http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf 2. Label the individual components for the on-site disposal system, including any reserve areas and indicate the required separation distances. |
| 07/30/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0158 1) Per City of Tucson (COT) Unified Development Code (UDC) section 7.4.6.H, provide vehicle barriers between proposed parking area and Lopez Wash. Per page 81 of the City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual and Per IBC 2012 section 1013, provide guards or barriers to prevent access from proposed parking lot and other accessible areas to the Lopez Wash 2) Pet COT UDC section 7.4.6.F.4, provide a backup spur at the end of the southernmost portion of the proposed parking area. Reference figure 7.4.6-B 3) Provide a hydraulic report for the project in accordance with section 5.1 of the COT Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual and Chapter 2 of the COT Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management 4) Demonstrate that the sheet flow or other runoff from the proposed development will not increase the erosion potential of the unlined Lopez Wash bank. Provide stabilization details if needed 5) Show on plans that any roof drains (downspouts) scupper underneath sidewalks or pedestrian walkways. Reference COT Technical Standard (TSM) 7-01.4.1.E 6) Sheet 2: Existing spot grades are illegible. All Sheets; Address overlapping text/dimensioning 7) COT Administrative Manual (AM) section 7-01.4.3.B requires 84" of unobstructed vertical clearance for sidewalks or pedestrian areas. Update detail 2 on sheet 1 so that the 7' vertical clearance on the accessible parking sign is to the lowest sign 8) Key Notes Where Applicable; COT Standard Details (SD) have been replaced by Pima Association of Governments (PAG) standard details Refer to the following link and where applicable reference appropriate PAG standard details. http://apps.pagnet.org/standardspecifications/ 9) Total parcel size is less than 1 acre. Provided "Request for a Waiver" from Pima County is for a sewer connection. Provide a completed/approved form for a waiver from the minimum septic 1 acre requirement John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 07/30/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Phil: This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Corrected plan set 2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal, 2_plan_set.pdf 2_swppp_report.pdf and the plans will re-enter the review cycle. Thank you, Kelly Lee Lead Planner Planning & Development Services (520) 837-6999 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2018 | KLEE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |