Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0130
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/05/2018 | KELLY LEE | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/18/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/26/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/26/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Landscape section has reviewed the plans and no specific comments need to be addressed. Prior to full landscape approval, ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. |
| 06/26/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Raytheon - Environmental Test Facility Zoning Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0130 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 26, 2018 DUE DATE: July 3, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 31, 2019. 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 1. COMMENT: Remove the Development Package PDSD approval stamp on all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Label on the grading sheets the Contour Interval used. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 3. COMMENT: On the cover sheet, list the Landscape Architects telephone number. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 4. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0130, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 5. COMMENT: Label the city of Tucson Jurisdiction limits as reference on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 6. COMMENT: Clarify if the new building is for a stand-alone use other than manufacturing or is it a building for an accessory use to the existing manufacturing use(s); the label the on the building implies that the building is for testing. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, 7. COMMENT: Include a calculation that clearly shows the expansions as of annexation or last full code compliance review. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 8. COMMENT: Clarify whether or not any recorded easements exist on the proposed development site. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/28/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/29/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | June 28, 2018 Kelly Lee Lead Planner City of Tucson Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: DP18-0130 Raytheon ETF Facility, Bldg 930/1151 E Hermans Rd/ 1st Submittal, Received June 5, 2018 Dear Ms. Lee, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0130, Raytheon ETF Facility, Bldg 930/1151 E Hermans Rd; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 10.13 acre site located southeast of the intersection of East Aero Park Boulevard and South Nogales Highway. The project proposes to establish a new industrial use. This site is within FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority is unable to provide approval of the development package application since the applicant has not formally submitted plans to the Tucson Airport Authority to review or met with Tucson Airport Authority staff to discuss the proposed project; both are requirements described in the Tucson International Airport Tenant Improvement Standards. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner cc file MS LB |
| 07/05/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-130 July 5, 2018 1. Show how water harvesting will be maximized: depress tree wells for water harvesting. (UDC 7.6.6.C.2) 2. The top of the outlet weirs from the basins along the west side of the project are at the same elevation as the top of the basins. Explain how the discharge will be directed to the outlet weirs. 3. Please note the PC/COT Standard Details and Standard Specifications have been superseded by the Pima Association of Governments Standard Details and Standard Specifications. |
| 07/07/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP18-0130Project Description: E SITE/GRADE/SWPPP - RAYTHEON ENVIRONMENTAL TEST FACILITY BUILDING 930 (PHASE 1) To see reviewer's comments about your plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search.You will need to enter the activity number shown above to see comments about the plan. This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle:1) Corrected plan set2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal,2_plan_set.pdf2_response_letter.pdf Alexandra Hines, AICP Lead Planner at Planning and Development Services, City of Tucson 201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 837-6975 - alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/10/2018 | KLEE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |