Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0104
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/22/2018 | KELLY LEE | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/11/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of sanitary manhole MH#13 (2487.60') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2488.25'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve for the building sewer connecting to MH#13. Floors discharging from above the first floor elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. [Initial comment: Revise the site utility drawing to include the invert and rim elevations of all manholes to which the building is connected. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 07/16/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/17/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Geico Insurance Offices - PAD 15 Zoning Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0104 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 17, 2018 DUE DATE: July23, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 2, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 2: It is acknowledged that a lot split application (S18-058) has been applied for and has been approved for recordation but it does not appear that the documentation (as of this DP review) has been submitted back to Zoning for finalization of the Lot Split Application. PREVIOUS COMMENT 2: It appears that the platted block 3 is to be subdivided. Prior to zoning approval of the DP a Lot split application, approval and recordation will be required. 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 2. Follow Up To Previous Comment 11: The previous comment was not addressed in its entirety; the calculation needs to reflect the number of van accessible spaces provided of the overall accessible spaces. Based on the 32 Accessible spaces provided a minimum of 5.3 spaces must be van accessible spaces, the requirement is for every 6 or fraction thereof the accessible spaces provided, 1 van accessible is required. In this case 6 van accessible spaces are required. Revise the parking calculation on sheets 1 and 2 and the drawings to show 6 van accessible spaces. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: Verify that the number of vehicle parking spaces provided is correct. Per the number of parking spaces shown and labeled on sheet 4, there are 2,009 spaces verified. The number of spaces listed under the vehicle parking calculation states 800 required and 1,940 provided. It is not clear if the accessible spaces are included in the 1940 or are they in addition to the 1,940. Revise the accessible parking spaces number to state how many Van and Standard accessible spaces of each have been provided. Revise the vehicle parking calculations as required. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 3. Changes to the base site plan must be made to all site sheets including landscape and grading. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/17/2018 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. The development will have no significant impact to any nearby ADOT facilities. Thank you. Tom Martinez <TMartinez@azdot.gov> |
| 07/18/2018 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 07/20/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-104 1) Previous comment 3. Roof drain to the north is now showing a pipe connecting to a truck loading dock. Show the discharge location of the DOCK drain. Reference Keynote 38 on sheet 5 2) Pima County Regional Flood Control District Comments a. District requests that a junction structure be placed within the Geico project boundary with a pipe connection from it to the existing District catch basins. Maintenance responsibility will be private upstream of the junction structure and District responsibility downstream. b. Provide a detail of the pipe connection to the existing catch basin, including method for basin cut-out and new pipe collar dowels or other joints c. District requests an inspection of this connection prior to Final Inspection or Certificate of Occupancy. John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 07/20/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | July 19, 2018 Kelly Lee Lead Planner City of Tucson Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: DP18-0104 Geico / 2nd Submittal, Received June 25, 2018 Dear Ms. Lee, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0104 Geico, 2nd Submittal. This is a development package application for an approximately 16.0 acre site which is located northwest of the intersection of East Tucson Marketplace Boulevard and Martin Luther King Jr Way. The proposed land use is Planned Area Development 15 (PAD-15) and will ultimately develop into a commercial office use. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority provided a comment letter, dated 5/18/2018, on the 1st submittal of this project. The Tucson Airport Authority has no additional comments to submit and is satisfied with the 2nd submittal of the project since the applicant have provided the Tucson Airport Authority with the copy of the recorded Avigation Easement document and have shared an updated page of the development package plan set which documents that both conditions of approval have been incorporated into the general notes. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner cc file |
| 07/23/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP18-0104Project Description: E SITE/GRADE/SWPPP - GEICO AT THE BRIDGES Fees Outstanding: $7,449.62. We will not review 3rd submittal until review fees are paid. To see reviewer's comments about your plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search.You will need to enter the activity number shown above to see comments about the plan. This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle:1) Corrected plan set2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: third (3rd) submittal,3_plan_set.pdf3_response_letter.pdf Alexandra Hines, AICP Lead Planner at Planning and Development Services, City of Tucson 201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 837-6975 - alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/23/2018 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |