Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0104
Parcel: 132130680

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP18-0104
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/02/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
05/04/2018 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Reqs Change Regional Traffic Engineering has a comment on this submittal; are there any traffic related documents included this development package?

Will any be required for future submittals? ADOT would like the opportunity to review and comment on any documents in future packages. Thank you.
05/07/2018 KELLY LEE UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed
05/07/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
05/07/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
05/15/2018 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP18-0104 Geico at the Bridges 05/30/2018

() Final Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations



SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() Approval
(X) Denied
() Rezoning history on site
() Annexation history on site
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other







REVIEWER: MM
DATE: 05/30/2018

COMMENTS: Pending approval by Mayor and Council.
05/17/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Geico Insurance Offices - PAD 15 Zoning
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0104

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 16, 2018
DUE DATE: May 31, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 2, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS


1. COMMENT: On the cover sheet, remove the text overlapping the Location Map. Also the Plat numbers are not required on a Development package Site plan location map. Remove the Plat numbers.

2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet.


2. COMMENT: It appears that the platted block 3 is to be subdivided. Prior to zoning approval of the DP a Lot split application, approval and recordation will be required.

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;


3. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0104, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Reference next to the title block of all plan sheets the TP and Final Plat case numbers of The Bridges Subdivision as well as the lot split case number.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


4. COMMENT: On the cover sheet drawing, add the information related to the sheets that represent the portion of the drawing show on that sheet. See standard below.

2-06.4.5 - When the development package documents consists of more than one sheet, a sheet index (a legible drawing of the site showing the area represented on each sheet) is to be placed on the cover sheet or the second sheet.


5. COMMENT: A reduced scaled drawing on the cover sheet that depicts the overall PAD area is to be drawn on the cover sheet. The current drawing on the cover sheet does not depict the overall PAD area. Revise as required.

2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed.


6. COMMENT: See related Comment 3 above.

2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project.


7. COMMENT: A separate sheet that includes the tabulations tracking table must be included in the next submittal of the DP. Contact Jeff Behrana at 602-286-9300

2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.


8. COMMENT: The site boundary distances and bearings will be verified against the survey drawing used for the lot split application and approval. Include a copy of the stamped and approved Survey drawing with the next submittal.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.


9. COMMENT: If as part of the lot split recordation the newly split lots are assigned a lot number or letter be sure to label the Geico lot with the assigned number or letter, i.e. Lot 1A, Lot B etc.

2-06.4.9.B - Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements.


10. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard below.

2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review.


11. COMMENT: Verify that the number of vehicle parking spaces provided is correct. Per the number of parking spaces shown and labeled on sheet 4, there are 2,009 spaces verified. The number of spaces listed under the vehicle parking calculation states 800 required and 1,940 provided. It is not clear if the accessible spaces are included in the 1940 or are they in addition to the 1,940. Revise the accessible parking spaces number to state how many Van and Standard accessible spaces of each have been provided. Revise the vehicle parking calculations as required.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.


12. COMMENT: Clarify if the dimension labeled on sheet 15 from the short term bicycle parking spaces adjacent to the building wall is incorrectly dimensioned. It appears that the dimension is made from the inside of the building rather from the exterior of the building wall.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.


13. COMMENT: On sheet 7, keynote 28 is labeled as a canopy. Clarify what type of structure is proposed, temporary shade for security, etc.




If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
05/17/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
05/21/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Approv-Cond May 18, 2018

Alexandra Hines
Lead Planner
City of Tucson
Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ. 85701

RE: DP18-0104 Geico / 1st Submittal, Received May 2, 2018

Dear Ms. Hines,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0104 Geico, 1st Submittal. This is a development package application for an approximately 16.0 acre site which is located northwest of the intersection of East Tucson Marketplace Boulevard and Martin Luther King Jr Way. The proposed land use is Planned Area Development 15 (PAD-15) and will ultimately develop into a commercial office use.

This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.

The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following conditions of approval, as noted below. These conditions should be identified in the general notes of the revised development plan.

Conditions of approval:

1. "According to the FAA Notice Criteria Tool, this project is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the project. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes used which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp"

2. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."

The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a complete copy of the recorded easement to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below.

Scott Robidoux
Senior Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,

Scott Robidoux,
Senior Airport Planner

cc file
05/24/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the site utility drawing to include the invert and rim elevations of all manholes to which the building is connected. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
05/29/2018 KELLY LEE COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP18-0104 Geico at the Bridges 05/30/2018

() Final Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations



SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() Approval
(X) Denied
() Rezoning history on site
() Annexation history on site
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other







REVIEWER: MM
DATE: 05/30/2018

COMMENTS: Pending approval by Mayor and Council.
05/29/2018 KELLY LEE COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.





Howard B. Dutt, RLA

Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040

Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
05/30/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case; PAD
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of the revised PAD.
According to previous PAD document, this site was sectioned off for residential development. Landscape cannot approve development package until PAD revision has been effectuated and specific conditions addressed.
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.
Additional comments may apply
05/30/2018 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP18-0104 Geico at the Bridges 05/30/2018

() Final Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations



SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() Approval
(X) Denied
() Rezoning history on site
() Annexation history on site
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other







REVIEWER: MM
DATE: 05/30/2018

COMMENTS: Pending approval by Mayor and Council.
05/30/2018 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP18-0104 Geico at the Bridges 05/30/2018

() Final Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations



SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() Approval
(X) Denied
() Rezoning history on site
() Annexation history on site
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other







REVIEWER: MM
DATE: 05/30/2018

COMMENTS: Pending approval by Mayor and Council.
05/31/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP18-0104

1) Sheet 9; Provide wheel stops on the north side of the east-west running sidewalk or revise width of sidewalk to be minimum 6.5 feet to account for vehicle overhang.
2) Keynote 16 is missing from various curb access ramps. Check all sheets and add reference keynote as needed
3) Show on plans that any roof drains (downspouts) scupper underneath sidewalks or pedestrian walkways. Reference City of Tucson Technical Standard (TSM) 7-01.4.1.E. There appear to be additional roof downspouts shown (see bottom right hand corner of sheet 5, along match line see notes 31,13) draining onto a pedestrian access way. Confirm and update if necessary
4) The parallel to slope orientation of the majority of the water harvesting basins is not practical and the reliability of such a design is difficult to guarantee. It is not clear that the design of the water harvesting landscape islands will function as fully intended. Provide spot grades and flow lines around each basin to show which parking lot segment drains to which basin. It is recommended that the basins be re-orientated, or that inlets be provided on the long side of the basins
5) Pima County Regional Flood Control District Comments
a. While the use of storm water harvesting basins to retain on-site flows is appropriate and appreciated, the District is concerned that the lack of defined overflows may result in increased maintenance needs due to rill erosion on the unprotected slopes. In order to address this issue, the District recommends use of a storm drain system. The drainage master plan anticipated the use of storm drains and storm drain outlet infrastructure exists at each of these Blocks. The water harvesting basins can easily accommodate overflows that connect to a storm drain system rather than flow as sheet flow into the regional basin.
6) Sheet 9. Roof drain at south-east corner of building. Maximize rain water harvesting by moving scupper to the east so that water drains into landscape area and not into accessible parking space. Provide outlet as needed

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
06/08/2018 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Passed
06/08/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP18-0104Project Description: E SITE/GRADE/SWPPP - GEICO AT THE BRIDGES

To see reviewer's comments about your plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search.You will need to enter the activity number shown above to see comments about the plan.

This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle:1) Corrected plan set2) Items requested by review staff
Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal,2_plan_set.pdf2_response_letter.pdf

Alexandra Hines, AICP
Lead Planner at Planning and Development Services, City of Tucson
201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 837-6975 - alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/08/2018 AHINES2 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed