Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0056
Parcel: 136133300

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP18-0056
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/10/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
1. Legal description and address of site;
2. Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
a. Minimum Width
Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border must be measured from the future MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Section 5.4.4, Establishment of MS&R Right-of-Way Lines and Gateway Routes.

Portion of the landscape buffer along Golf Links appears not to be 10'. Dimension landscape buffers.

7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS

When Required
Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1.

Provide on the following on the landscape plan:

Screening
a) Location of screening elements;
b) Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
c) Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material).

Maintenance Schedule
a. Pruning schedules to show that plant material will maintain pedestrian and vehicular clearances or that the material will establish opaque hedge screens, if required;
b. Replacement criteria, should plant material not survive;
c. Replacement or upkeep maintenance schedules for inert ground cover materials;
d. Upkeep maintenance schedules for exterior hardscape materials; and,
e. Maintenance and replacement schedules for irrigation systems.

SECTION 4-01.0.0: COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING
Applicability: All commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010.

1. A separate Water Harvesting Implementation Plan shall be submitted with all applications for new commercial developments where landscaping is required. The plan shall detail the landscape water demand and the harvested water supply needed to meet 50 percent of landscape demand.

2. Provide water budget data, along with the background data and assumptions used to develop it. This water budget format is available to applicants as an Excel spreadsheet @ cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/water_budget_spreadsheet.xls.

SECTION 2-11.0.0: NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Section:

Provide NPP plan or Application for Exception https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/NPPOapp.pdf

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval.
Additional comments may apply.
04/10/2018 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change SECTION 2-11.0.0: NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Section:

Provide NPP plan or Application for Exception https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/NPPOapp.pdf
04/13/2018 MMORENO1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Dutch Bros
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0056

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 15, 2018
DUE DATE: April 13, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS


2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

1. COMMENT: Provide the CDRC approval stamp in the lower right hand corner.

2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing.

2. COMMENT: Please provide the information noted by the standard above.

2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.


3. COMMENT: Please provide a legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing, legend is to be provided on the cover sheet.

2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. Sheet index does not match number on sheets.

4. COMMENT: Please number the site, plan hardscape plan and the site detail sheets and include the 3 sheets as part of the development package submittal.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

5. COMMENT: Number all sheets of the development package submitted.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

6. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0056, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

7. COMMENT: Please address the following comment listed above.

2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;

8. COMMENT: The subject property must be centered within a one square mile area.

2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property;

9. COMMENT: Please address the following comment listed above.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____."

10. COMMENT: List the existing zone of the subject property C-1 & C-2 as a general note.

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

11. COMMENT: Because this is part of a larger site Provide gross area of the site by square footage and acreage for the entire site.

2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet.

12. COMMENT: Provide rezone case number C9-72-80 on the lower right corner or the title block and list all rezoning conditions as a general note.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

COMMENT: The existing use is food service: excluding soup kitchens. The proposed use of the development is food service: Excluding soup kitchens and is subject to use specifics standard C-1 zone 4.9.4.M.1 & 5 4.9.13.O. C-2 is subject to 4.9.4.M.1 and 4.9.13.P

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

13. COMMENT: When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions

The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

14. COMMENT: Please list all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

15. COMMENT: Provide the dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

16. COMMENT: Please list all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined..


2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.



2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

17. COMMENT: Demonstrate that eastern most vehicle parking allows for a 2.5 foot vehicle overhang, it appears that site lighting and accessible signage encroaches.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

18. COMMENT: Please provide the information noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

19. COMMENT: Please provide the information noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

20. COMMENT: If applicable indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

21. COMMENT: All proposed and new signs will have to go through the permit process and will require a new permit.

22. Comment: Draw in the stacking spaces that will fit within the drive-thru lane. Minimum stacking space is nine by eighteen feet.

23. Comment: Please submit a cross access agreement document for the proposed development

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Michael.Moreno@Tucson.az.gov at any time during the week.
RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
04/13/2018 MMORENO1 H/C SITE REVIEW Passed
04/13/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2753.61') is higher than the first floor elevation (2753.50'). Revise sewer construction note 3 on sheet C4 to require the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
04/16/2018 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
04/17/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP18-0056
1) Sheet SP1.3. Detail 13, 14; Trash enclosure to comply with City of Tucson Standards Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 8-01.9.0 Figure 3B. Remove reference to Pinal County. Provide Waste Stream calculation on plans per TSM section 8-01.8.0
2) Sheet SP1.3. Detail 5; Clearance between ground surface and sign is 7' per TSM 7-01.9.0 Figure 4. Remove reference to Town of Gilbert
3) Sheet SP1.3. Detail 3; Curb access ramps shall comply with Pima Association of Governments (PAG) standard detail 207
4) Sheet SP1.3. Detail 11; Curbs shall comply with PAG standard detail 209
5) All sheets; Refer to the following link and where applicable reference appropriate PAG standard details.
a. http://apps.pagnet.org/standardspecifications/
6) Sheet C7 appears to be a duplicate of Sheet SP1.3. Remove either C7 or SP1.3 from drawing set. Update references/sheet index accordingly
7) Reference Drainage Report JN 3814 by Rick Engineering to ensure that drainage design is in compliance with the existing site development plan detention/retention requirements
8) Sheet C3. Remove references to C.O.T standards and replace with applicable PAG standard detail references
9) Sheet C3. Keynote 17. Per TSM section 7-01.4.3.E, roof drains are to scupper underneath sidewalks. Revised details to show appropriate scuppers using PAG standard details
10) Sheet C3. Keynote 4. Provide additional openings along curb flow lines to maximize water harvesting. All landscape areas are to be depressed minimum 6".
11) Additional comments may be forthcoming pending response to these and other department comments

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/23/2018 BLARSON1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed