Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0053
Parcel: 14036005E

Address:
4975 E BENSON HY

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP18-0053
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/15/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/15/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Approved No Design Professional review at this time. General Note, FLD Subdivision Notes #4, on sheet 1 states Architectural Variation Plan (AVP) will be deferred revision prior to building permit. Transition Edge Treatment is not applicable so no Privacy Mitigation Plan (PMP) required.
03/15/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Agency notified for information only.
03/15/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Agency notified for information only.
03/15/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Agency notified for information only.
03/28/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Approv-Cond March 27, 2018

Alexandra Hines
Lead Planner
City of Tucson
Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ. 85701

RE: DP18-0053 Valencia Crossing / 1st Submittal, Received March 9, 2018

Dear Ms. Hines,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0053, Valencia Crossing; 1st Submittal, a tentative plat application for an approximately 35.3 acre site located northwest of the intersection of East Littletown Road and East Valencia Road. The proposed land use is residential, establishing a single family residential use.

This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.

The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition should be identified in the general notes of the approved development plan.

Conditions of approval:

1. "According to the FAA Notice Criteria Tool, this project is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the project. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes used which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp"

2. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement prior to the subdivision process which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."

The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. The Avigation Easement document shall be recorded in a manner which documents the Avigation Easement as having title liability; all subsequent title searches on this property shall identify and document the recorded Avigation Easement. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a complete copy of the recorded easement to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below.

Scott Robidoux
Senior Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

3. "The developer shall provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units, but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit shall be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."

The new property owner or new tenant shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority, using the mailing address provided below.

Scott Robidoux
Senior Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,


Scott Robidoux,
Senior Airport Planner

cc file
04/02/2018 KELLY LEE PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change DP18-0053 Valencia Crossing / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.

The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. SEE DOCUMENTS IN PRO.

Thank you,



Robin Freiman

Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department

201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 724-7570
04/03/2018 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved Valencia Crossing Lots 3 & 4
DP18-0053
Project Reviewer TDOT - Zelin Canchola
Date April 3, 2018

TDOT recommends approval of the Tentative plat.

Please revise note #14 sheet 1 of 42 to reference PAG standard specifications and details.

zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
520 837 6659
04/04/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
Include case # DP18-0053 and any other relevant case numbers on the lower right hand corner or each sheet.
Verify that all the Landscape Border and Screening requirements for PAD-21 have been met.
2-06.3.5 - Remove Development Package PDSD approval stamp on all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically.
The following are specific to FLD requierments:
8.7.3. FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD)
Landscaping, Screening and Wall Requirements

1. FLD projects shall comply with Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards, except as otherwise provided by this section.

2. One canopy tree shall be provided every 40 feet of pedestrian circulation systems, excluding crossings with streets, alleys, and driveways. If providing canopy trees every 40 feet is not achievable, the applicant shall:

a. Provide the equivalent number of trees that would be obtained using the 40-foot increment measure; and,

b. Distribute the trees within the FLD project site along pedestrian circulation systems and within functional open space areas.

Provide calculation as to the location of equivalent tree placement.

Mechanical equipment, utility boxes, irrigation equipment and similar elements shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the FLD.

Verify screening is not required.

If a perimeter wall is proposed along an existing public right-of-way, it shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The wall shall incorporate one or more of the following decorative materials:
a. Tile;
b. Stone;
c. Brick;
d. Adobe;
e. A textured material such as stucco or plaster; or,
f. Metal.

Provide the following if applicable;

Screening
a) Material Location of screening elements;
b) Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
c) Nature of screening material
d) Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant).

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval.
Additional comments may apply.
04/05/2018 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports the document. However, Regional Traffic would appreciate involvement with further reviews as the development progresses due to its vicinity with Interstate 10, and any possible impacts to the facility. Thank you.

Tom Martinez <TMartinez@azdot.gov>
04/05/2018 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Development Plan/Tentative Plat submitted on March 9, 2018.

In order for an electrical design to be completed, please provide a copy of the Approved Tentative Plat and water plans to mburke@tep.com. Easements for TEP facilities must be shown on the Final Plat before TEP can approve the plat.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 917-8744.

Thank you,

Mary Burke
Right of Way Agent III
Tucson Electric Power Co.
Land Resources – RC 131
3950 E. Irvington Road
Tucson, AZ 85714-2114
Office - 520-917-8744
Cell - 520-401-9895
mburke@tep.com
04/09/2018 MMORENO1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Michael Moreno
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Valencia Crossings Lots 3 and 4
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0053

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 9, 2018
DUE DATE: April 9, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD).


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0053, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes


2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project.

2. COMMENT: Once the final plat case number has been assigned, please list it as a reference next to the title block of all sheets.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

3. COMMENT: Clarify if phasing is a possibility or a proposal.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

4. COMMENT: If applicable, draw and label all existing and proposed easements.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.G - If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information.

5. COMMENT: If applicable please provide the information noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

6. COMMENT: Under the perimeter yard setbacks must be dimensioned from back of curb and from lots 88 through 108 will have to be measured from back of curb. Interior streets setbacks will have to be measured from the nearest edge of travel lane. Please provide the proposed interior lot building setbacks. Label the setbacks or add a note for the proposed setbacks. Add following note "The perimeter yard requirements of Section 6.3.4, Dimensional Standards and Exceptions Tables, may be reduced for setbacks along interior lot lines to the extent permitted by the City's adopted Building Codes".

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

7. COMMENT: Add as a general note that sidewalks are not to exceed 2% cross slope and 5% running slope.

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)

2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:

2-06.5.3.A. Reduced Perimeter Yards
Street perimeter yards along interior street rights-of-way and perimeter yards between interior lots may be modified in accordance with Section 8.7.3.L, Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots, of the UDC. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Applicants requesting a reduced street perimeter yard must provide a written description of how the reduced yard will enhance the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and submit a transportation statement, or if required by the Department of Transportation, a traffic impact analysis;

8. COMMENT: Include lot detail drawings with building setbacks from the interior streets and the adjacent property lines.

2-06.5.3.D - Building Elevations
Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits;

9. COMMENT: Please provide the preliminary elevation drawings with the next submittal.

2-06.5.3.E - Architectural Variation Plan
When applicable, an architectural variation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC as follows:

10. COMMENT: Refer to design professionals review comments for the architectural variation plan.

2-06.5.3.E.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide architectural variation; and,

11. COMMENT: Refer to design professionals review comments for the architectural variation plan.

2-06.5.3.E.2 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and building footprints) demonstrating how the proposed architectural variation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC.

12. COMMENT: Refer to design professionals review comments for the architectural variation plan.

2-06.5.3.F - Privacy Mitigation Plan
When applicable, a privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC as follows:

13. COMMENT: Refer to design professionals review comments.

2-06.5.3.F.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide privacy mitigation;

14. COMMENT: If applicable provide the information noted by the standard above.
2-06.5.3.F.2 - Provide photographs of the site and its interface with the adjacent properties documenting the existing conditions; and,

15. COMMENT: If applicable provide the information noted by the standard above.

2-06.5.3.F.3 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC. The plan should include when practicable additional design elements to increase privacy such as the siting angle of buildings, windows, and lots;

16. COMMENT: If applicable provide the information noted by the standard above.


2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property.

17. COMMENT: If available provide CC&R's with the next submittal or submitted with the final plat.

18. COMMENT: Additional Comment: 2-06.3.5 - Remove Development Package PDSD approval stamp on all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically.


19. Please correct Lot numbers 63 and 64 on sheet 3,10 and 16.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Michael.Moreno@Tucson.az.gov at any time during the week.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
04/09/2018 MMORENO1 H/C SITE REVIEW Passed
04/09/2018 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP18-0053 Valencia Crossing Lot 3 & 4 4/09/2018

() Final Plat
(X) Denial
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations



SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() Approval
(X) Rezoning history on site
() Annexation history on site
() No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: MM DATE: 4/9/2018

COMMENTS

Valencia Crossings lot 3 and 4 is currently in its 1st submittal and is being reviewed for DP18-0058. Valencia Crossings is subject to rezoning C9-12-03 and is subject to all conditions listed in the Valencia Crossing Pad. The PAD states that the Master Association shall establish a Design Review Committee (DRC), prior to submittal of any development plan or tentative plat, which will be responsible for reviewing and approving all details of project design through a self-certification process. The Design Review committee shall consist of an architect, a landscape architect and a member of the master association. The DRC shall review and approve/disapprove the architectural design of all development within the PAD District to ensure it is consistent with the Valencia Crossing Design Guidelines. A copy of the self-certification will be provided to the City of Tucson at the time of development plan/subdivision plat submittal advising whether the design conforms to the standards established by the DRC.
04/09/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the site utility drawing to include the points of connection to the proposed public sewers and the proposed first floor elevations for the buildings. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. Note that sheets 3, 10, and 16 have two lots numbered 62 and no lot numbered 64.
04/13/2018 AHINES2 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Passed Water accepted under 6 lots.
04/16/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP18-0053
1) Sheet 4. Is the "VALENCIA CROSSING PAD EXHIBIT" intentionally shown? Appears out of place
2) There appears to be only 19 sheets, sheets are listed as being out of 42. Correct sheet numbers
3) Per January 25th 2018 pre-submittal conference, show building erosion hazard setback from Julian wash

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
04/16/2018 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
04/18/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items to the upload webpage:
1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All items requested by review staff to approve these plans
04/18/2018 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approv-Cond Tucson Parks and Recreation has no issues or concerns regarding this development. Developer should coordinate with the Pima County Regional Flood Control District and/or the Pima County Natural Resources Parks & Recreation Department regarding the construction and maintenance of the project's connection to the Loop Path along the Julian Wash shown on the plans.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/18/2018 AHINES2 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed