Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0042
Parcel: 12801020C

Address:
120 S WILMOT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP18-0042
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/22/2018 KELLY LEE START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/15/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
03/19/2018 JPEELDA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
03/20/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP18-0042

1) Provide note that all landscaped areas are to be depressed a minimum of 6" for water harveting, this includes the tree islands adjacent to accessible parking
2) Per City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) section 7.6.6.C.2 maximize rain water harvesting. From the grading plan it appears that a curb cut could be employed in the north-west corner of the development to drain water into the landscaped area. There is a low corner with a spot grade of 80.10P. Update drawing as needed.

John Van Winkle, P.E.
john.van-winkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
03/21/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS

Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1.

30" screening is required to screen drive through from Wilmot Rd.

Indicate the following:
Screening
a) Location of screening elements;
b) Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
c) Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and,
d) Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material).

4.3 Streetscape Landscape Border - Maximum Width
In situations where the street landscape border is wider than the minimum ten foot standard, the landscape border width needs to be determined for the purposes of calculating the 50% vegetative coverage standard. The width is that area between the required screen and the property line, unless there is permitted encroachment into the right-of-way as per this section.

Landscape border appears to more than 10' wide dimension landscape buffers and if applicable indicate screening elements.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval.
Additional comments may apply.
03/22/2018 MMORENO1 ZONING HC REVIEW Passed
03/22/2018 MMORENO1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Michael Moreno
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Dutch Bros Wilmot
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0042

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 22, 2018
DUE DATE: March 22, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 13, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS


2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

1. COMMENT: Development package DP18-0042 is missing pages 7-9

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2. COMMENT: Provide development package case number, DP18-0042, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

3. COMMENT: What is the purpose of the striped area adjacent to the parking space along the southwest. If this is for pedestrian access it appears that it is in the vehicular use area without being raised or protective. zoning suggest to put backup spur instead of the striped area.


Additional Comment: 2-06.3.5 - Remove Development Package PDSD approval stamp on all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically.

Additional Comment: Draw in the stacking spaces that will fit within the drive-thru lane. Minimum stacking space is nine by eighteen feet.

Additional Comment: The southern property boundary dimension on the submitted development package does not seem to match what the assessor's parcel map has recorded, please clarify.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Michael.Moreno@Tucson.az.gov at any time during the week.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
03/23/2018 KELLY LEE ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP14-0042

Project Description: DUTCH BROTHERS

The plans you submitted for our review require corrections.

Plan Returned for Corrections Notice -DP18-0042
120 S WILMOT

The plans you submitted for our review require corrections.

To see reviewer's comments about your plans, please visit the Development Services web site at
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search
You will need to enter the activity number shown above (DP18-0042) to see comments about the plan.

Read the next section of this email for instructions on how to prepare a Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments they are meant to address. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, Please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd:
1) Revised Plan Set
2) All approved documents submitted previously
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example:

Example 2 (second submittal):
2_plan_set.pdf
2_soils_report.pdfand the plans will re-enter the review cycle.

**********HOW TO PREPARE YOUR RESUBMITTAL**********
A properly completed response letter is a critical component of a plan resubmittal. The response letter should be completed by the individual or firm who makes the appropriate corrections to the plans.
Plans are reviewed by one or more reviewers at Development Services.
When a reviewer 'denies' a particular review, the needed corrections are identified (see link to comments above). A properly completed Response Letter will identify each review that was 'denied' and individually provide detailed comments on how the plans were modified - for each correction listed under 'Corrections Required'.

IMPORTANT: A comprehensive Response Letter allows the reviewers to limit their re-review to just the corrections required, i.e. the reviewer should not need to review the entire set of plans again. The comprehensive Response Letter, along with the corrected plans, is the most effective action that can be taken toward getting your plans reviewed and approved on the resubmittal, and in the shortest time possible.

Thank you!
Kelly Lee

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/23/2018 KLEE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed