Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0035
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/30/2018 | KELLY LEE | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/31/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/12/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/14/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 513 W. Oury Street - An FLD Subdivision (2 Dwellings) Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0035 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 14, 2018 DUE DATE: June 28, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 08, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 8: The previous comment was not addressed in its entirety. As a general note, list the DDO case number, Date of approval and conditions of approval. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. PREVIOUS COMMENT 8: If additional application related to this development are required such as overlay or modifications list the case type as a general note(s), date of approval, modifications or conditions of approval and list the case numbers as reference next to the title block of all sheets. 2. Follow Up To Previous Comment 9: Add a separate note or add to the note above that lots 1 and 2 are affected by the DDO application. 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. PREVIOUS COMMENT 9: If applicable add the information as noted by the standard above. 3. Follow Up To Previous Comment 11: This comment will remain applicable until the recording has been completed and the documentation provided to PDSD for review. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: On Sheet 5, a note related to a "New utility and access easement per this DP." Clarify when the easement will be recorded. Per an email between Steve Shields and Matt Stuart the easements will have to be in place prior to Lot Split Approval. This means that the easement should be recorded and a sequence number obtained through the Pima County Recorder's office prior to approval of the DP or the note needs to reflect that the easement will be recorded by separate instrument and listed on the Lot split drawing. 4. Follow Up To Previous Comment 14: Per my conversation with Richard Macias on June 14, 2018, it was requested that additional setback dimensions be added to the site sheet for reference. The setbacks requested were from the east property line to the east parallel and angled building walls for both dwellings. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. PREVIOUS COMMENT 14: The proposed building setbacks along Oury Street, and the east and south boundary property lines will require approval through a DDO process. The minimum building setback along the east and south property lines is based on the greatest of 6 feet or 2/3rds the height; based on a height of 16 feet from grade the minimum building setback is 10'-8" from the east and south property lines. The developer is proposing a 3.9 foot setback along the east property line and 3 foot setback along the south property line. The building setback for the building on "Lot A" along the Oury Street frontage is based on the greatest of 20' or 1.5 times the height measured from the street property line. Based on a 16 foot building height from grade; the building setback must be 24 feet from the street property line. The plan did not include a building setback to the street property line. (Developing area setbacks do not apply for this project.) 5. Follow Up To Previous Comment 17: After discussion with the Zoning Administrator regarding the FOS it is not clear that the FOS as depicted on the plan provides for a functional use. Clarify what type of functionality this FOS area will provide. Clearly define on the site sheets Functional Open Space "A" and "B". In addition to the overall FOS SF, the FOS square footage on each lot shall also be noted on the site sheets. I have also provided a copy of the CC&R's to the Zoning Administrator for her review of the Functional Open Space section 3.3. AS of this review the CC&R's have not been yet approved by zoning. 2-06.5.3.C - Functional Open Space Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations; PREVIOUS COMMENT 17: The functional open space must be under the guides of a HOA. It does not appear that an HOA is proposed for this development and the functional open space has to be accessible to all residents of the subdivision. Proposal for FOS within the individual lot does not meet the requirement. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/21/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/25/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/25/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The revised FFE for the proposed building on lot 1 (2342.80') is still less than 12" above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole (9859-24, 2341.91'). Provide a backwater valve for the proposed building on lot 1. [Initial comment: Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor (e.g. lot 1). Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 2. Note that the 4" building sewers will require the use of directional fittings (i.e. not saddle taps) when connecting to the existing 6" public sewer. |
| 06/27/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/28/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Lisa: This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Corrected plan set 2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: third (3rd) submittal, 3_plan_set.pdf 3_swppp_report.pdf and the plans will re-enter the review cycle. Thank you, Kelly Lee Lead Planner Planning & Development Services (520) 837-6999 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2018 | KLEE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |