Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0004
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2018 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/08/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 01/08/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 01/08/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 01/26/2018 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP18-0004 Jack in the Box Restaurant 01/29/2018 () Final Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval (X) Rezoning history on site (X) Denied () Annexation history on site () No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: MM DATE: 01/29/2018 COMMENTS Site is addressed 3749 S Mission Rd and is currently being reviewed for DP18-0004. Site has rezoning history to monitor per development package checklist, which indicates rezoning conditions do apply. Jack in the Box Restaurant is subject to rezoning C9-78-38. Please provide and list rezoning conditions for C9-78-38 verbatim on resubmittal of DP18-0004. |
| 01/26/2018 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. The proposed location of the development will have no significant impact to nearby ADOT facilities. Thank you. |
| 01/30/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approv-Cond | ***Letter in Documents folder in PRO.*** |
| 01/31/2018 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP18-0004 Jack in the Box Restaurant 01/29/2018 () Final Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval (X) Rezoning history on site (X) Denied () Annexation history on site () No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: MM DATE: 01/29/2018 COMMENTS Site is addressed 3749 S Mission Rd and is currently being reviewed for DP18-0004. Site has rezoning history to monitor per development package checklist, which indicates rezoning conditions do apply. Jack in the Box Restaurant is subject to rezoning C9-78-38. Please provide and list rezoning conditions for C9-78-38 verbatim on resubmittal of DP18-0004. |
| 01/31/2018 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/31/2018 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP18-0004 Jack in the Box Restaurant 01/29/2018 () Final Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval (X) Rezoning history on site (X) Denied () Annexation history on site () No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: MM DATE: 01/29/2018 COMMENTS Site is addressed 3749 S Mission Rd and is currently being reviewed for DP18-0004. Site has rezoning history to monitor per development package checklist, which indicates rezoning conditions do apply. Jack in the Box Restaurant is subject to rezoning C9-78-38. Please provide and list rezoning conditions for C9-78-38 verbatim on resubmittal of DP18-0004. |
| 01/31/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP18-0004 Jack in the Box Restaurant 01/29/2018 () Final Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval (X) Rezoning history on site (X) Denied () Annexation history on site () No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: MM DATE: 01/29/2018 COMMENTS Site is addressed 3749 S Mission Rd and is currently being reviewed for DP18-0004. Site has rezoning history to monitor per development package checklist, which indicates rezoning conditions do apply. Jack in the Box Restaurant is subject to rezoning C9-78-38. Please provide and list rezoning conditions for C9-78-38 verbatim on resubmittal of DP18-0004. |
| 02/01/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/01/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 1. Legal description and address of site; 2. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Measurement of the Scenic Routes Buffer Area 1. The Scenic Routes buffer area is measured from the future MS&R right-of-way, except as follows. 2. Exception. Where the MS&R roadway design includes installation of a sidewalk, pedestrian way, or bike path, the buffer may be measured from the MS&R projected back of the sidewalk, pedestrian way, or bike path if the buffer does not encroach more than ten feet into the future MS&R right-of-way with the written permission of the City of Tucson Department of Transportation. The use of the MS&R right-of-way is permitted only if the area can be landscaped. Obtain a permission for use of the ROW Note: Landscaping on Adjacent Sites Existing drought tolerant vegetation on adjacent sites must be considered in design to prevent abrupt changes in plant types and to maintain a visual continuity along street frontages. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 02/02/2018 | MMORENO1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael Moreno PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Jack in the Box Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0004 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 5, 2017 DUE DATE: February 5, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 5, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. 2. COMMENT: Provide drawing scale on the cover sheet. 2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving. 2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 3. COMMENT: Title blocks to be the same scale, font and text per every sheet. 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 4.COMMENT: Please provide a three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp Per Pages 4, 5 & 6. 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. 5.COMMENT: Please provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing Per pages 4, 5 & 6. 2-06.3.11 - A key plan (if provided) shall be located on the first sheet. 6.COMMENT: Please Provide a key plan on the first sheet of the Development Package. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 7.COMMENT: The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. Landscape architect and or any other….. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 8.COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0004, and Rezoning Number C9-78-38 adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." 9.COMMENT: Correct Zoning from CR-1 to C-1 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 10.COMMENT: Because this is part of a larger site Provide gross area of the site by square footage and acreage for the entire site. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 11.COMMENT: Please list all of the rezoning conditions for case C9-78-38. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. 12.COMMENT: When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that the , requirements are being met. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 13.COMMENT: Please label and provide the 15' C.O.T. Water Line Easement Book 6207, Page 944 to 946 that is on the northeast portion of the property. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 14.COMMENT: Please provide recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 15.COMMENT: Please list all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 16.COMMENT: Please show and provide the location for the bicycle parking facilities, fully dimensioned and refer to Article 7.4.9 B. for Bicycle Parking Criteria and design standards. 2-06.4.9.J - If Street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 17.COMMENT: Please draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) on Mission Rd. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 18.COMMENT: Please draw and dimension all new and proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 19.COMMENT: Provide the dimensions for the proposed sidewalk around the new building. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 20.COMMENT: Please dimension proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled. Provide location and dimensions for the ADA required access ramp per sheet 2. Please show and provide the required pedestrian circulation path that connects all public access areas of the development. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 21.COMMENT: Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning if any are applicable for this project. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 22. COMMENT: All proposed and new sings will have to go through the permit process and will require a new permit. Additional Comments: -Please submit a document of cross access agreement for the proposed development. -Please show and provide minimum vehicle stacking calculations per Table 7.4.7 for the proposed drive-thru along with the design criteria requirements -The stacking area for drive-through lanes must not cross on-site pedestrian access as proposed to the dumpsters on the development package. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/02/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | An approved development plan is not for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction drawings for the on-site utilities shall be included with the building permit. |
| 02/02/2018 | MMORENO1 | HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 02/02/2018 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | February 1, 2018 WR# 6218253 DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov marty@baetucson.com rickvolk@volkco.com Dear Rick SUBJECT: Jack in the Box 3749 S Mission Rd DP18-0004 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. There does not appear to be any conflicts at this time. Should the existing TEP facilities (noted on the plans) require relocation, it will be 100% billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Jennifer Necas @ 918-8295. Sincerely, Beth Shelton Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton Admin Assistant, Design |
| 02/14/2018 | JVWINKL1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1st Submittal Comments 1: Provide site visibility triangles per Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06.4.9.H.2 2: Update TRASH DUMPSTER DETAIL 3 on sheet 2 in accordance with Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section 8-01.9 Figure 3b. Interior clear width and depth 3: Show on plans roof drains and scuppers 4: Provide spot elevations within 50' of proposed development according to AM section 2-06.4.8 5: Show scupper from curb to drainage channel in northwest corner and any other associated drainage features. AM 2-06.4.8.F 6: Show on plan sheet 2 the survey monument to which the bearings and distances of the proposed development are tied into. 7: Show water course/flood zones in location plan on sheet 1 8: Provide permission from City of Tucson Transportation Department to use 10' of Right of Way as a part of the Scenic Route landscape buffer 9: Show on plans location of "TYPICAL BICYCLE PARKING DETAILS" found on sheet 1 John Van Winkle John.van-winkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 02/15/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/16/2018 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |