Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP17-0301
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2018 | QJONES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/03/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | for info only |
| 01/03/2018 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | for info only |
| 01/03/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | For info only |
| 01/03/2018 | KELLY LEE | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | for info only |
| 01/09/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | ***Attachment can be viewed in documents table on PRO.*** DP17-0301 Hub 3 at Tucson/ 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 01/12/2018 | CLAURIE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP shall reflect denied until the project is fully approved. |
| 01/22/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 01/22/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2421.51') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation of the parking area (2422.23'). The installation of a backwater valve will be required for any plumbing fixtures (e.g. floor drains) installed on that floor level. Fixtures located on floors at least 12" above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 01/23/2018 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Gary Wittwer has the following comments: 1. All plants in the ROW must be on the approved plant list. I don't believe Rhaphiolepis is on the list. 2. Please submit an irrigation plan. 3. Be sure to add the required notes for planting in the ROW (see below). City of Tucson Department of Transportation Standard Notes for Planting in ROW 1. It is the owner's responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section. 2. It is the owner responsibility to keep a 5' wide by 7' tall clear pedestrian access open across the entire property. 3. It is the owner responsible to keep vegetation from growing past the curb line clear, and keep a 15' high clear zone over the travel lane. 4. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. 5. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. 6. The owner takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities. 7. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW are lateral lines, tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment must be on private property. (excluding water meter) 8. Contractor to obtain a Right Of Way permit prior to construction within the right-of-way. |
| 01/23/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | January 22, 2018 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP17-0301 PROJECT NAME: The HUB @ Tucson III PROJECT ADDRESS: 830 E Speedway PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT The proposed improvements in the right of way are acceptable; however the following will need to be submitted. 1. A traffic impact memo/statement and or an addendum to prior traffic impact analysis for HUB I and 2. is required 2. Keep all references to work within the right of way to PAG standard details. 3. At time of construction in the right of way, a private improvement agreement (PIA) with TDOT will be required. Improvements to the alley driveway at Speedway may be required at time of PIA. Maintain minimum 20 feet wide alleyway. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/24/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 2. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case numbers on the bottom right hand corner of each sheet and specific conditions related to landscaping identified in Environmental Conscious Design Standard Compliance (Section C-16) are Indicated on the landscape plan and verify conditions are met. Verify that the following comments from Gary Wittwer regarding plantings in the ROW are addressed: 1. All plants in the ROW must be on the approved plant list. I don't believe Rhaphiolepis is on the list. 2. Please submit an irrigation plan. 3. Be sure to add the required notes for planting in the ROW (see below). City of Tucson Department of Transportation Standard Notes for Planting in ROW 1. It is the owner's responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section. 2. It is the owner responsibility to keep a 5' wide by 7' tall clear pedestrian access open across the entire property. 3. It is the owner responsible to keep vegetation from growing past the curb line clear, and keep a 15' high clear zone over the travel lane. 4. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. 5. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. 6. The owner takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities. 7. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW are lateral lines, tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment must be on private property. (excluding water meter) 8. Contractor to obtain a Right Of Way permit prior to construction within the right-of-way. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/24/2018 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Completed | See zoning comments |
| 01/24/2018 | KELLY LEE | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | Kelly, Environmental & General Services has completed our review of the Hub 3 at Tucson proposed project. The solid waste and recycling management proposal is to provide six 4 cubic yard metal containers for the refuse and recycling materials. The containers would be rolled into the adjacent alley to the west for servicing once per week. The waste generation calculations were reviewed and found to be correct. Based on a review of an aerial photograph, there may be one electric power pole in the alley near the south end of the subject property. However, there are no power poles in the portion of the alley where the containers will be positioned for servicing. Based on this review, Environmental & General Services sees no objections to the proposed solid waste management plans for this site. Please contact me if there are any questions concerning this review. Thank you. Tom Ryan, P. E. City of Tucson - Environmental & General Services Department |
| 01/25/2018 | KLEE1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments. |
| 01/25/2018 | TOM FISHER | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Approved | Hi Kelly, No further comments from TDOT Transit. It shows that the existing bus pullout and shelter will remain in place. Thomas Fisher Project Manager City of Tucson Dept. of Transportation 201 N. Stone, 5th Floor Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 phone (520) 837-6752 tom.fisher@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/25/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Kelly Lee Lead Planner PROJECT: Hub at Tucson, Phase III Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0301 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1/25/2018 DUE DATE: 1/24/2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is 12.22.2018. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.1 - Provide email addresses for those contact missing an email address. 2. 2-06.4.2.B - Provide a brief legal description within the title block. 3. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0301 and the Main Gate Special application case number T17SA00305, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. 2-06.4.7.A.1 -Place the C9-__-__ and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 5. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. The proposed use is Group Dwelling, not Group Home. Also, the Maingate Decision Letter includes food service and personal service in the list of potential uses. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - The site is located in the Main Gate Overlay District. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional overlay. List the Main Gate Special Application case number; indicate it is located within Area 1 (Tyndall Sub Area), date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval. 7. 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - A lot combo will be required prior to Development Package approval. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions 8. The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 9. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 10. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - 2-06.4.9.H.2 - See Maingate District Development Document, page 14 in regards to sight visibility triangles. 11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided. 12. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. Are the bike racks in the garage considered long-term parking or short term bicycle parking? 14. 2-06.4.9.O - Show applicable building setback lines along Speedway and Tyndall. See comment #26. 15. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 16. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. Ordinance 11394 Main Gate District Development Document Section C.3 Table I Development Standards 17. The maximum building height in Area 1 (Tyndall Subarea) is 56 feet (not 75 feet). Please correct on the cover sheet. 18. The minimum setback from the property line along Speedway Boulevard is 21.5 feet. A zoning determination was approved on June 7, 2017 indicating the setback may be measured from the northern boundary that existed in 2012 prior to the bus pullout construction. Please add a note to the plan and clearly show the building setback along Speedway. 19. 2-06.4.9.D - Remove the note regarding lot coverage. Label as open space calculations. 20. Section C.4.b: Pedestrian Access; Sidewalks- clearly show there is a 12 clear sidewalk along Speedway 21. Section C-17: Add a note regarding the step-back requirement from the ground floor to the 2nd level as indicated in the Maingate Design Package. This requirement was modified during the Maingate DRC process. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-6999 or Kelly.Lee@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/30/2018 | KLEE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/02/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | We have received a request from the Urban Landscape Manager from the Public Information & Conservation Office of Tucson Water that we encourage incorporation of a cistern system or other system to promote the beneficial use of stormwater runoff for landscape water. We recommend consideration and incorporation into project design. |
| 02/02/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No Real Estate concerns at this time, assuming all improvements within the RoW will be covered by the project PIA. I don't see any balconies or architectural elements encroaching into the RoW but should the plan change to include any, those would require aerial easements. Developer should consult Real Estate if they have any questions John Cahill Real Estate Supervisor City Dept. of Transportation 201 North Stone Av. 6th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 837-6768 |
| 02/05/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/19/2018 | LPEREZ2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |