Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP17-0289
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | Please review my comment letter on DP17-0289. I have included the applicant on the email so they can receive a copy of the comment letter. Thank you, Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner |
| 01/04/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following information: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. 7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION Exceptions Projects on a site or parcel that contains Protected Native Plants that will not be substantially impacted by development on the site as demonstrated by the applicant per this section and subject to approval through procedures established at the PDSD, provided that construction occurs per the approved plans. Provide the stamped and approved NPP plan with Application for Exception. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/04/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION Exceptions Projects on a site or parcel that contains Protected Native Plants that will not be substantially impacted by development on the site as demonstrated by the applicant per this section and subject to approval through procedures established at the PDSD, provided that construction occurs per the approved plans. Provide the stamped and approved NPP plan with Application for Exception. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/09/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/09/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TEP - Raytheon Aero Park Substation Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0289 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 9, 2018 DUE DATE: January 09, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 7, 2018. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 1. COMMENT: List the email addresses for the Engineer, Landscape Architect, Developer and list the contact person and email address for the Owner (City of Tucson). 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP17-0289, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 3. COMMENT: Revise general note 3 to state the correct UDC section to 4.8.7. The property is zoned I-2 and there is no applicable Use Specific Standard that applies to a Distribution System in the I-2 Zone. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 4. COMMENT: List under general note 11 the difference in elevation grades between the SW runway grade elevation and the tallest structure elevation on the proposed site. The height shall note exceed the allowed height of 75-88 within the subject project area. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 5. COMMENT: It is acknowledged that the distance and bearings listed on the plan is to provide the Easement boundary location for the subject project. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 6. COMMENT: Label the setback from the property line to the substation wall facing the street. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 7. COMMENT: Label as a keynote the height of the tallest structure or equipment within the walled area. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/17/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide a complete SWPPP. |
| 01/17/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 12/08/2017 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/13/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/13/2017 | KELLY LEE | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | For info only |
| 12/13/2017 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | For info only |
| 12/14/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/20/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 12/20/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | For info only |
| 12/27/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/18/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 01/18/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/18/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |