Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP17-0146
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/04/2017 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/04/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | |
| 08/11/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/14/2017 | MCASTRO2 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Mark Castro, Lead Planner - for Steve Shields, Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Raytheon Building 845 Hanger Addition Development Package (2nd Review) DP17-0146 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 29, 2017 DUE DATE: September 1, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 21, 2018. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. Follow-up to previous comment 3. The previous comment is still applicable. The page number format should be "xx of xx" on all sheets. Previous comment 3. 2-06.4.2.D - Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all sheets. 2. Follow-up to previous comment 4. On sheet 1, correct the development package case number in the title to DP17-0146. In addition, correct the development package case number in the lower right corner on all of the sheets (the letter 'P' was excluded from the case number). Previous comment 4. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0146, and the annexation case number, C15-09-03, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 3. Follow-up to previous comment 9. The previous comment is still applicable. It does not appear that the percentage of building expansion from existing to total is provided. Previous comment 9. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Under Area Calculations, provide the percentage of building expansion. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. Follow-up to previous comment 12. Remove the proposed parking leader on sheet 1. Previous comment 12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - On the cover sheet, a parking area is proposed but details have not been provided. If parking is proposed, then show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Mark Castro, (520) 837-4979 or Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/29/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | As previously commented, please include the whole basin on the plan sheets. I recognize the scale of the drawings is inconvenient. The basin may be included as a detail referenced from the plan view drawings. |
| 08/29/2017 | MCASTRO2 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/30/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/31/2017 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 08/31/2017 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/31/2017 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |