Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP17-0142
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/16/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/17/2017 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/23/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | I spoke to RWRD and there has been no observation permit issued for the project at this time. Please add the same condition to the permit that I sent on the second submittal. PCDSD has no objection to the approval of the DP Package. Thanks, Joseph Joseph Godoy Site Review Manager Pima County Development Services 201 N. Stone Ave Tucson, AZ 85701 joseph.godoy@pima.gov (520) 724-6756 |
| 10/24/2017 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and accepts the documentation submitted for the operational analysis for adjacent ADOT facilities. In addition, Regional Traffic Engineering supports the approval of the proposed development. Thank you. Tom Martinez <TMartinez@azdot.gov> |
| 10/30/2017 | WILLDAN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Alexandra Hines - Lead Planner PDSD Landscape Review PROJECT: Caterpillar Surface Mining & Technology HQ - Administrative and Professional Office Development Package (3rd Review) DP17-0142 - C-2 & I-1 - 875 W Cushing St TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 25, 2017 DUE DATE: October 30, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all landscape review comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM), and the UDC Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. 2-10.4.1.A - ...Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 24. Comment not fully addressed. Provide City Engineer approval that the use of the Public Right-of-Way is approval and complies with standards per 7.6.4.F. >> Provide written approval from TDOT Gary Wittwer in next submittal. >>> Provide email thread from Gary Wittwer, outline your response to Gary's review comments, and show in plan set. Additional review comments may be forthcoming due to response to landscape review comments or other review agency comments including owner driven changes to the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Alexandra Hines, (520) 837-6975 or Alexandra.Hines@tucsonaz.gov. This review can take place over the counter. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 10/30/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 10/30/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Alexandra Hines - Lead Planner for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Caterpillar Surface Mining & Technology HQ - Administrative and Professional Office Development Package (3rd Review) DP17-0142 - C-2 & I-1 - 875 W Cushing St TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 25, 2017 DUE DATE: October 30, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and the highlighted plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all zoning review comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM), and the UDC Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. 1. Comment 14 not fully addressed. Acknowledged that IID will be submitted, if approved, provide information and conditions on development package. >> Provide information from decision letter on Development Package if IID overlay is approved. >>> Provide IID decision letter date and other information on Development Package. 2. Comment 37 not fully addressed. Provide a short term bicycle detail that clearly demonstrates how the requirements of 7.4.9.B.1 & .2, and 7.4.9.C are met. Also provide a long term bicycle detail that clearly demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1 & .2, and 7.4.9.D are met. Bicycle parking calculation does not appear correct. Demonstrate compliance to UDC Section 7.4.9.B.1.d. hard surface and -e. lighting. Seek exception from UDC Section 7.4.9.C.2.a location of short-term bicycle parking from PDSD Director. >>> Obtain modification to short-term bicycle parking location in IID approval. 3. Comment 44 not fully addressed. The maximum height permitted in C-2 zone is 40 feet. Include IID Decision Letter approval in next submittal. Provide information from decision letter on Development Package if IID overlay is approved. >>> Obtain modification to height in IID approval. 4. Additional comment - Remove or complete blank general note 13. Wastewater did not comment on it. Additional review comments may be forthcoming due to response to zoning review comments or other review agency comments including owner driven changes to the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Alexandra Hines at (520) 837-6975 or Alexandra.Hines@tucsonaz.gov. This review can take place over the counter. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: revised development package |
| 10/30/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | IID Director Decision Letter needed to approve modifications in Development Package. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/02/2017 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 11/02/2017 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/02/2017 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |