Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP17-0094
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/20/2017 | KLEE1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Needs Review | Waiting on Exemption Letter for Charter School |
| 04/20/2017 | KELLY LEE | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review | Waiting on Exemption Letter |
| 04/20/2017 | KLEE1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Needs Review | Waiting on Exemption Letter for charter School |
| 04/27/2017 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Academy of Math and Science - 434 W. Lerdo Road Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0094 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 27, 2017 DUE DATE: May 17, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 18, 2018. 1. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The mounting height of the accessible vehicle parking space sign needs to be revised to reflect the following; mounting height when the sign is within pedestrian circulation path 84", when not within the circulation path, i.e. wall mounted or within a landscape are 60". 2. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show the required signs for the three (3) accessible spaces show west of building #2. 3. 2-06.4.9.R - Per IBC 1104.1 demonstrate on the plan that there is an accessible route between all structures, to all accessible vehicle parking spaces, to at least one of the right-of-ways, etc. that meets the requirements of 2012 IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009. 4. 2-06.4.9.R - Clearly show and dimension all ramp landings; 5. 2-06.4.9.R - Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009.Section 405.7.5 are met for all ramps adjacent to doors. 6. 2-06.4.9.R -There are two (2) ramps located near the center of the north side of building #3 that do not appear to have an accessible route to them 7. Sheet 3 keynote 20 references landscape sheets but there are no landscapes sheets in the development package. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/10/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/17/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (#5867-02, 2512.90') is higher than the first floor elevation of the new 1-story building (2510.5'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 05/17/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The waste stream calculation indicates that just over 2 cubic yards per week will be generated. This total includes recycling. The requirement will be met using a 2 cubic yard bin for trash and a 2 cubic yard bin for recycling. I recommend this if the school thinks it will be sufficient. 2. Revise note 19 on sheet 1 to clarify the meaning. 3. Note 27 on sheet 2 should be revised since there will be no Tentative Plat for this site and no development plan other than this Development Package. 4. Note 32 should be revised. The number and extension for PDSD Engineering is no longer active. 5. Add a note indicating that the installation of the underground retention systems will be observed by the Engineer-of-Record and a report confirming compliance with the plans and specification will be required before final inspection. 6. The site plan indicates a retaining wall along the alley. Provide information on the grade on each side of the wall and top of the wall. This needs to be provided for all retaining walls. 7. On sheet 3, note 27 says to see plan for new sidewalk widths. Provide the dimension on the plan. For clarity also provide dimensions for existing sidewalk areas throughout the plan. 8. On sheet eight, keynotes 16 and 18 are listed but not used. Keynotes 6 and 8 are used but not listed. Correct these typos. |
| 05/17/2017 | KLEE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | May 16, 2017 To: Theresa Hadley CYPRESS CIVIL DEVELOPMENT ____________________________________ From: Hussein Al Zubaidi, RWRD (520) 724-6404 Subject: TH & SCIENCE SUCCESS ACADEMY P17WS00043 PSL-1st Submittal The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS) 2016. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience. Cc. Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., RWRD Tom Porter, P.E., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD |
| 05/18/2017 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/23/2017 | MMENDIB1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |