Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP17-0052
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/27/2017 | MMENDIB1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/01/2017 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP17-0052 North Airport Expansion was Approved by Pima County Addressing on 3/31/17. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0 |
| 05/02/2017 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Submittal of a copy of the infiltration test to PDSD Engineering to show infiltration in 12 hours within basins per previous comment number 12 is required. See UDC 7.14.4, Section 14.2, item 6. |
| 05/03/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/03/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: North Airport Expansion - (Raytheon Campus) Development Package (2nd Review) DP17-0052 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 3, 2017 DUE DATE: May25, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 13, 2018. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. Follow up to previous comment 1: The information for the Landscape Architect shall be listed on the cover sheet. Previous Comment 1: 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. Provide the above information on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. Follow up to previous comment 11b: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The table on sheet 6 was updated as requested but it appears that the combined square footage in the table does not match the combined square footage in general note 6 on sheet 2. Previous comment 11b: Zoning could not verify the information such as SF, height, parking for the control building. The building was not listed in zoning note 6 on sheet 2 or in the tables. The building shall be listed along with the others and include any parking applicable to this use. 3. Follow up to previous comment 12: the loading zones next bldg. 921 measure to 12'x 45' and keynotes 12 and 13 still state 12'x45' loading zones. Revise as requested per the previous comment. Previous Comment 12: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Industrial uses are required to provide Type B loading zones which measure 12' x 55'. The tabulation table on sheet 2 indicates that Type A is provided for the Multi-Purpose building 921. Per the UDC, Table 7.5.5-A Required Loading Areas, Type B loading area is what is required for the industrial use. Revise the loading zones on site sheet C1.S07 and Keynote 12 to Type B and revise the loading zone type in the tabulations table on sheet two to Type B for building 921. Revise the Type B keynote 13 on sheet C1.S07 to state a 55' x 12' loading zone, it noted as 45' x 12'. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/11/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | May 10, 2017 Dear Ms. Lee, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP17-0052, North Airport Expansion; 1st Submittal, a 2nd review of a development plan application for an approximately 18.93 acre site located south of East Aero Park Boulevard, north of East Hermans Road, and west of an existing drainage channel which crosses East Aero Park Boulevard and East Hermans Road. The proposed land use is industrial. The Tucson Airport Authority does not have any additional comments to submit as part of this review process for the City of Tucson. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Airport Planner cc file MS |
| 05/22/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. A backwater valve is not needed for building 921 as the force main from the lift station will have a check valve. [Initial comment: Clarify the meaning of the extraneous keynote #11 symbols on sheet C1.U06.] 2. Identify the manhole located between buildings 919 and 920 and provide its rim elevation. [Initial comment: Provide the rim elevation of each manhole located upstream of a building HCS. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 05/24/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 05/24/2017 | AMORALE3 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/24/2017 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Needs Review | Trish RWRD unfortunately cannot provide review comments as we have yet to receive a “formal” submittal which includes the plan review fee. Equally important is we have yet to receive what we term the Sewer Capacity for these improvements so we can provide the required Type III Sewer Capacity. See attached emails indicating these and other requirements. I spoke with John McGann of GLHN late this morning, he indicated RWRD will be receiving these and other critical pieces of information by tomorrow. Give me a call if you have any questions. Lorenzo Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E. Manager, Development Liaison Unit – Planning and Engineering Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department 201 N. Stone Avenue, 3rd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 Phone: 520-724-6645 lorenzo.hernandez@pima.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/01/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |