Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP17-0034
Parcel: 11612535A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP17-0034
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/12/2017 SSHIELD1 HC SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments
06/12/2017 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Principal Planner

PROJECT: Pima County Housing
Development Package (3rd Review)
DP17-0034

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 12, 2017

DUE DATE: July 10, 2017

COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 07, 2018.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. Previous comment 9 - This comment was not addressed on sheets L2 - L-6. Remove the address from the title block and provide it adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the street address adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2. Previous comment 20 - This comment was not fully addressed It does not appear that the distance from curb to property line is correct, see attached paving plans. Provide dimensioned width of paving, curbs, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.8.C - The 30' right of way dimension is not shown correctly. This dimension is from the centerline of Ontario to the property line of your parcel. Also provide dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

3. Previous comment 24 - This comment was not fully addressed. The 2% slope is in all directions not just the length. Per ICC A117.1, Section 502.5 the maximum slope allowed within the accessible vehicle parking space and access aisle is 2%, clearly show this requirement on the plan. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking space showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, markings, grade slopes, accessible parking aisle, signage, van accessible space and access to the accessible route. Per the 2012 IBC, Table 1106.1, the accessible vehicle parking space is required to be a van accessible parking space. Demonstrate on the detail that the accessible space meets the requirements of ICC A117.1, Section 502.2.

4. Previous comment 26 - This comment was not addressed correctly. The sign mounting height is not correct. Based on the location shown the mounting height from the bottom of the van accessible sign grade is 84". 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a large scale accessible sign detail including a van accessible sign and show the location of the sign on the plan.

5. Previous comment 27 - This comment was not addressed correctly. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1 RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings and Group Dwelling the requirement for short term bicycle parking is 0.10 spaces per bedroom. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces. That said the calculation should be as follows "12 x 0.10 = 1.2 or 2 required. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1 RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings and Group Dwelling the requirement for long term bicycle parking is 0.50 spaces per bedroom. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces. That said the calculation should be as follows "12 x 0.50 = 6 required. This comment was not addressed correctly. Provide the number required within the Short & Long term calculation. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a short and long term bicycle parking space calculation that provides the number required and provided along with the ratio used. It does not appear that the provided short term bicycle parking calculation is correct, review UDC Table 7.4.8-1.

6. Previous comment 28 - This comment was not addressed. Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e demonstrate how lighting is provide for the proposed bicycle racks. Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.f show the required 2' x 6' space for each bike on the plan. The 4'-0" dimension shown on the plan is not correct and should be shown from the edge of rack not center, see UDC figure 7.4.9-C. It does not appear that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.C.2.a are met to all proposed buildings on site. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a short term bicycle parking space detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1 & .2 and 7.4.9.C are met.

Additional comments

7. Previous comment 37 - This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.2.D - Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) within the title block on all sheets. Once the landscape sheets are provided the total number of sheets will need to be updated.

8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. The calc shows 12 provided when there are 13 shown on the plan.

9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The vehicle parking space shown in the northwest corner of the parking area requires a wheel stop.

10. 2-06.4.9.R Clarify why there are two additional ramps, one on the northwest sidewalk and one on the east/west sidewalk north of buildings 3 & 4, shown on the plan.

11. Based on the location of the north property line shown on this plan a Board of Adjustment for a Variance will be required for proposing to place required landscaping and vehicle parking within the right-of-way (ROW). Also provide written permission from The City of Tucson Transportation Department allowing the proposed improvements within the ROW.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
07/05/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304.
2. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is allowed to be used at the junction of a building drain and a building sewer; otherwise, cleanouts shall open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2012.
3. The following comments have not been addressed. Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information:
a. The location of fire hydrants.
b. The pipe diameter of the public sanitary sewer and the invert and rim elevations of the manholes upstream and downstream of the connection to the public sewer. Provide the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference numbers for each manhole.
c. The locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and streetlights.
d. The first floor elevations for the buildings
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
07/06/2017 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the plans to reflect the requirements for interior landscape borders for the proposed multi-family use, parking lot screening along Ontario St., correctly identifying and locating the street landscape border in front of the parking lot. UDC Table 7.6.4.I

Update the plans to show borders and screening information. AM 2-10.4.2.A.2

UDC 7.6.4.F Provide verification in writing of any approvals received fronm the City Engineer for any proposed work in the public right of way.
07/11/2017 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Show the location of the existing street light in the street frontage for the project. Ensure that the driveway is at least 5 feet from the street light standard. (Tucson Code 25-38.a.
2. Provide existing contours and proposed spot grades throughout the site.
3. Projects with six or more units require centralized collection. (TSM 8-01.5.1.a) Show container location, access and enclosures for garbage and recycling service. We acknowledge that Environmental Services has approved the use of individual APCs for the project. Since this is a deviation from the Technical Standards, a TSMR must be applied for and approved.