Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP16-0167
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/23/2016 | RBENT2 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/23/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | For notification purposes only. |
| 09/23/2016 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | Plans do not require review per Addressing Submittal Review Worksheet. |
| 09/23/2016 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | For notification purposes only. |
| 09/23/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | For notification purposes only. |
| 09/23/2016 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | For notification purposes only. |
| 09/28/2016 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | September 28, 2016 To: Jean Armstrong Baker & Associates Engineering, Inc. ____________________________________ From: Hussein Al Zubaidi, PCRWRD (520) 724-6934 Subject: PRECISION TOYOTA VEHICLE STORAGE YARD P16WS00086 (DP16-0167) PSL- 1st Submittal The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS). If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience. Cc. Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., RWRD Thomas Porter, P.E., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD |
| 10/03/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/03/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 10/05/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning comments |
| 10/05/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Commercial Storage Lot Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0167 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 5, 2016 DUE DATE: October 20, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 20, 2016. 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 1. COMMENT: List the email address for the Owner/Developer on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name; 2. COMMENT: List the name of the project in the title block of all plan sheets. 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 3. COMMENT: The information on the title block of the landscape plan shall be consistent with the title block info on the cover sheet. Revise the title block on the landscape plan sheet to match. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 4. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP16-0167, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 5. COMMENT: Remove the Map and plat numbers off the location map. They are not required on a development package site plan. 2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 6. COMMENT: Label Prince Road and Wetmore Road on the location map. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 7. COMMENT: List the existing use of the property under general note 4. 2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." 8. COMMENT: List the note as stated above verbatim on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 9. COMMENT: List the note as stated above verbatim on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 10. COMMENT: Label the zoning classification I-1 and MH-2 across Roger Street. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. COMMENT: Per table 7.4.4-1 Commercial Storage is required to be provided with the following parking requirements: 1 space per 5,000 sq. ft. GFA, plus 1 space per 5,000 sq. ft. of outdoor storage area for the first 20,000 sq. ft. of outdoor storage area, plus 1 space per 10,000 sq. ft. of outdoor storage area over 20,000 sq. ft. of outdoor storage area. The ratio for GFA does not apply because there is no building proposed but the outdoor storage area must be parked based on the ratio criterion listed above. Calculate the storage areas and provide the number of parking spaces based on the storage areas. Accessible parking will be required based on the number of spaces required. The parking area shall be defined and comply with the Design criteria in section 7.4.6. 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 11. COMMENT: Once the DP site plan is approved by zoning the grading plan is also approved as it pertains to the zoning review of the grading plan. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 12. COMMENT: Include in the next submittal of the DP a separate memo explains how the conditions of the Special Exception (SE) have been addressed or plan to be addressed. Where required add detail drawings on the dp sheet that demonstrate compliance with conditions of the SE. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 13. COMMENT: If applicable to this site, draw and label any proposed freestanding monument type signs. If so add a general note that signs will be permitted under separate permit. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 14. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments related to the Landscape buffer and screening requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/13/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Along interior lot lines of the site, the required perimeter screens (WALLS) must be located on the property line, unless the screen is provided between the property line and the use and a landscaped area of a minimum width of 20 feet is provided between the screen and the property line. UDC 7.6.5.C 2) All commercial development and site plans submitted after June 1, 2010, shall include a rainwater harvesting plan. The rainwater harvesting plan shall include a landscape water budget and an implementation plan. TCC Sec. 6-182.A |
| 10/18/2016 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No proposed or existing Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/18/2016 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | Development Package sheet 1 of 8 in general notes, general note #6 calls out rezoning conditions 1-20. Please correct rezoning condition #17 as word (either) is not in original rezoning conditon. |
| 10/19/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | October 19, 2016 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP16-0167 PROJECT NAME: Precision Toyota - Inventory Overflow Parking PROJECT ADDRESS: 822 W roger Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required. A revised Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. The proposed improvements in the right of way, as outlined in the Traffic impact analysis, are acceptable given the proposed driveway will be right in right out only. Revise the plan to reflect a right in right out. 2. At time of construction a right of way permit will be required. Appropriate signage will need to be installed and maintained by the developer. 3. In the future full access may be permitted if proper improvements to the roadway are built. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/20/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Clearly label the security barrier or equivalent barrier for the basin since the basin is deeper than 2 feet and has slopes steeper than 4:1. |
| 10/21/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items need to approve this plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/24/2016 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |