Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP16-0147
Parcel: 109224490

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP16-0147
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/16/2016 RBENT2 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/16/2016 AHINES2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed For notification purposes only.
09/16/2016 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Passed For notification purposes only.
09/16/2016 AHINES2 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed For notification purposes only.
09/16/2016 AHINES2 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed For notification purposes only.
09/21/2016 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved See Revised cover sheet 9-21-16_Addressing in Documents button in PRO.

09/21/2016

DP16-0147 Blake's Tucson Store #93 / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. Please see the sticky note comments in 1a_site and grading sheets_Addressing.pdf. I have also attached a comment summary for your convenience.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Specialist
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
09/21/2016 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved See 1a_site and grading sheets_Addressing and Addressing Comment Summary DP16-0147 in Documents button in PRO.

09/19/2016

DP16-0147 Blake's Tucson Store #93 / 1st Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing as the corrections requested have been made and are reflected on the attached revised cover sheet.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Specialist
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
09/26/2016 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE

ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL

2-10.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

The landscape plan shall include the following:
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply upon subsequent reviews.
09/27/2016 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Please indicate location of new and/or existing fire hydrants. Review section 507.5 of the 2012 International Fire Code for spacing requirements.
09/27/2016 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Principal Planner

PROJECT: Blake's Tucson Store #93
Development Package (1st Review)
DP16-0147

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 28, 2016

DUE DATE: October 11, 2016

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 12, 2017.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP16-0147 , adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2. 2-06.4.3 - Please provide the following case numbers, DP1-0062, DP1-0065, P1212-008 & P1212-013, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

3. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes
4. The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions

5. The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

6. 2-06.4.8.B - There is a private access and maintenance easement shown on the final plat the is not shown on the plan. Show the easements.

7. 2-06.4.8.B - There is a private 30' landscape/signage easement shown on the final plat the is not shown on the plan. Show the easements.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development

8. The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

9. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Fully dimension the back-up spur shown at the north end of the east parking area, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4. Zoning recommends that the curbing be moved to the south so that 3' is maintained to prevent a backing vehicle from overhanging the sidewalk.

10. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Show the required 1' setback from the building to the drive-thru, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(2).

11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Revise the accessible parking sign to show a 7'-0" mounting height to the bottom of the accessible sign to grade.

12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - As the proposed short-term bicycle parking is adjacent to the building show the required 2'-6" setback to the walls south and east of the bicycle rack, see UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g.

Additional Comments;

13. Per PAD 22 Section III.D.3.c provide a view corridor plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
10/03/2016 SSHIELD1 ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments
10/04/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
10/05/2016 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP16-0147 Blake's Tucson Store #93 10/10/2016

() Final Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations



SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() Approval
(X) Denied
() Rezoning history on site
() Annexation history on site
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other







REVIEWER: MM
DATE: 09/29/2016

COMMENTS
DP16-0147 under The Rio Verde Village Planned Area Development states that under Section III, L. of the Design Review Committee on Pg. 96 states the following: The DRC shall review all proposed architectural plans. Through a self-certification process, the DRC will provide a letter of approval to the city at the time of plan submittal. The applicant must provide a letter of approval from the Design Review Committee for all proposed architectural plans, at the time of plan resubmittal. Please Submit required DRC letter for plan review.
10/05/2016 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
10/10/2016 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: October 10, 2016
DUE DATE: October 11, 2016
SUBJECT: Blake's Tucson Store
TO: Marty Magelli
LOCATION: 3560 N Craycroft Road
REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP16-0147
SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed:
1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the case number (DP16-0147).
2) Per AM 2-06.4.8I please show existing floodplain information within 50 feet of the site, including 100 year floodplain limits and erosion hazard setback limits from the existing conditions hydrology map from the site analysis contained in the PAD document (Page 26).
3) Per PAD Requirement K4 (page 91) the construction of bank protection is required along the no name wash before development is permitted within the erosion hazard setback or floodplain limits. The Parking and Buildings are required to be outside the floodplain areas per Section K4 (page 91) of the PAD. Please show the required bank protection as either existing or proposed and show the proposed conditions floodplain and erosion hazard setback limits per AM 2-06.4.9N. See the Developed Conditions Hydrology Map for Rio Verde Village (page 95 of the PAD) for delineation of the bank protection. Please show the proposed conditions floodplain and erosion hazard set back limits.
4) Per TSM 2-01.4.1C6 and the rigid pavement section of the addendum 2 (March 12, 2015) of the geotechnical report all PCCP pavement should have a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 4,000 psi. Please update the trash recycle enclosure detail 5 on sheet 3 to reflect the 4,000 psi requirement instead of the 3,000 psi requirement currently noted.
5) Per TSM 2-01.4.1C6 and page 17 of the original geotechnical report, the scarification depth requirement noted in Paving/Grading General note 10 on sheet 5 needs additional detail to incorporate the pavement preparation requirements that "prior to placing pavement materials that the exposed subgrade be scarified, moistened or dried as required to a depth of 10 inches." This would replace the 6" scarification depth in note 10 for pavement areas.
6) Per AM 2-06.4.8B permission from the easement holder is required for placement of the new retaining wall (Detail cross section 11/5) shown on the north side of development. Please provide evidence of this permission with the next submittal.
7) Per AM 2-06.4.8B please clarify the dimensions for the easement callout for easement type D (Varying Width) just east of the site limits on sheet 3 (within 50 feet of site).
8) Per TSM 7-01.4.3E please show how the 10 year storm water runoff is routed away from or under the pedestrian way where cross section 9/5 is called out near the southern boundary on sheet 4.
9) The detailed keynotes legend on sheet 4 calls out "DC" for both the "depressed curb opening" and the "connect downspout" The connect downspout should use a keynote "DS" designator to match what is shown in plan view.
If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov.
10/11/2016 AHINES2 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/12/2016 ARUIZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed