Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP16-0118
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/07/2016 | ARUIZ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/10/2016 | DTAKAKI1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | October 6, 2016 To: Warren D. Thompson Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 5151 E Broadway Blvd Suite 400 Tucson, AZ __________________________________ From: Hussein Al Zubaidi, EPT, PCRWRD (520) 724-6404 Subject: MOUNTAIN VAIL RESERVE LOTS 1-77 P16WS00055 (DP16-0118) DP - 2nd Submittal The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS). If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience. Cc. Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD Tom Porter, P.E., RWRD |
| 10/13/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: October 17, 2016 DUE DATE: November 2, 2016 SUBJECT: Tentative Plat/FLD TO: Warren D. Thompson, PE LOCATION: 9627 S Crowley Brothers Drive REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP16-0118 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the 2nd submittal of the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per previous comment 4 Sheets 7 and 8 were calling out a detail cross section 1/6 across Trapper Ridge. There are no details on sheet 6. Sheets 6 and 8 are still calling out this detail. Per hydraulic calculations contained in appendix C a crown section should be used. Please call out section 2/4 if appropriate. It was further noticed on the 2nd review that detail cross section 3/10 is being called out as part of detail 6 on sheet 3. There is no detail cross section 3 on sheet 10. When this detail is shown, it should include the location of the 6" orifice as being elevated at the top of the 24" diameter 24" spiral ribbed pipe such that retention occurs within the basin. The 6" orifice location should also be shown as part of detail 5/3 so that it can be verified that the 6" orifice opening is going to allow retention in the basin before discharge occurs. 2) Per previous comment 11 and TSM 2-01.8.1A differential grading requirements applies to lots 42 and 43 on sheet 11. Since the adjacent residential properties are already privately held and more than 2 feet of fill is being proposed from existing grades (based on existing contours) the differential grading process must be followed. 3) Per previous comment 13 and page 11 of the geotechnical report has a recommendation that Retention/detention basins shall be setback from structures at least 15 feet. Lots 292 to 294 of Mountain Vail Estates may contain structures closer than 15 feet to the property line. Please provide cultural survey data of the structures or areas where structures are permitted, for the adjacent subdivision such that the 15' setback can be demonstrated. The geotechnical addendum provided with the 2nd review does not speak to setbacks from retention/detention basins. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 10/18/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: Mountain Vail Reserve Development Package (2nd Review) DP16-0118 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 18, 2016 DUE DATE: November 2, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 14, 2017. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 1. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide case number C15-88-15 adjacent to the title block on sheets 12 - 20. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Provide the annexation case number, C15-88-15, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This includes sheets 21 & 22. 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Remove case number DS08-30 from sheets 21 & 22. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Remove DSMR case number DS08-30 from all sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. This comment was not addressed. The curb at the back of the accessible ramp appears to be in the middle of the 5' wide sidewalk. 2-06.4.9.S - At the southwest corner of Rabbit Run Way and Chevrolet Drive it is not clear what is happening with the sidewalk and curb that runs east of the corner. It appears that curb and sidewalk are proposed to close of Chevrolet Drive to the south, please clarify. 4. This comment was not addressed. The response letter states "Have added HC Ramp at CAA/S Miller Flats DR." and not mail boxes have been indicated on the plan. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. Once the above comments have been addressed Zoning will provide and over-the-counter review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/18/2016 | SSHIELD1 | HC SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 10/21/2016 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP16-0118 Mountain Vail Reserve / 2nd Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 10/25/2016 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N STONE AVENUE Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Janice Wagner GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: October 21, 2016 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: DP16-0118 MOUNTAIN VAIL RESERVE -2ND. PLAT REVIEW * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ____X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: - THE TITLE BLOCK MUST BE IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER. IT MUST HAVE THE NUMBER OF LOTS OR UNITS OR BLOCKS OR ANY COMBINATION OF THESE. IT MUST HAVE THE COMMON AREAS LISTED, IF THERE ARE ANY. IT MUST HAVE THE SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE AND IF IT IS A RESUBDIVISION, IT MUST MENTION THE PLAT NAME AND THE MAP AND PLAT. - THE LOCATION MAP MUST BE IN THE UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER AND MUST HAVE THE SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE. THE PROJECT AREA SHOULD BE OUTLINED OR HAVE AN ARROW POINT TO IT. - GENERAL NOTES MUST HAVE THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBDIVISION, THE NUMBER OF LOTS, THE NUMBER OF MILES OF NEW ROAD, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, EVEN IF THE NUMBER IS 0, AND THE BASIS OF BEARING. - THERE MUST BE A SECTION TIE, WITH A BEARING AND DIMENSION FROM THE SECTION CORNER OR QUARTER CORNER TO THE POINT OF TIE ON THE SUBDIVISION. - THERE MUST BE APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PERIMETER AND ALL LOT LINES AND ALL COMMON AREAS. - ALL LOTS MUST BE NUMBERED AND HAVE SQUARE FOOTAGE. IF THE AREA IS TOO SMALL, THEY CAN HAVE A TABLE TO THE SIDE FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE. - THERE MUST BE BEARINGS AND DIMENSIONS FOR THE PERIMETER AND ALL LOT LINES AND ALL COMMON AREAS. - CHECK OWNERSHIP TO MAKE SURE IT MATCHES WHAT WE HAVE. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 10/27/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/04/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/07/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve the plat. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/08/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |