Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP16-0118
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2016 | ARUIZ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/19/2016 | AHINES2 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approved | Review delayed until building permits |
| 07/20/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | Property outside of the Avigation Easement and Disclosure Area. |
| 07/20/2016 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Janice Wagner GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: July 20, 2016 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: DP-160118 / MOUNTAIN VAIL RESERVE 1ST REVIEW _ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. __X_____ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " OWNERSHIP DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE IN NAME. OUR RECORDS SHOW FIRST AMERICAN TITLE TRUST NO.9313. PLEASE GIVE US RECORDING INFORMATION FOR DEED THAT CONVEYED TITLE INTO TITLE SECURITY AGENCY, LLC TR 20146 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 07/21/2016 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal because of the development’s proposed location, it not have any impacts any ADOT facilities. Regional Traffic supports its acceptance. Thank you. |
| 07/26/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | July 21, 2016 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 5151 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste #400 Tucson, AZ 85711 Attn: Warren D. Thompson SUBJECT: Water Availability for project: 9627 S. Crowley Brothers Dr., APN: Multiple Parcels, Case #: WA2012, T-15, R-16, SEC-31, Lots: 1-85,9999, Location Code: TUC, Total Area: 16.6ac Zoning: R-1 WATER SUPPLY Tucson Water will provide water service to this project based on the subject zoning of the above parcels. Tucson Water has an assured water supply (AWS) designation from the State of Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). An AWS designation means Tucson Water has met the criteria established by ADWR for demonstration of a 100-year water supply - it does not mean that water service is currently available to the subject project. WATER SERVICE The approval of water meter applications is subject to the current availability of water service at the time an application is received. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying, but not limited to: 1) Water Use; 2) Fire Flow Requirements; 3) Offsite/Onsite Water Facilities; 4) Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System; and 5) Easements/Common Areas. Any specific area plan fees, protected main/facility fees and/or other needed facilities' cost, are to be paid by the developer. If the existing water system is not capable of meeting the requirements of the proposed development, the developer shall be financially responsible for modifying or enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs. This letter shall be null and void two years from the date of issuance. Issuance of this letter is not to be construed as agency approval of a water plan or as containing construction review comments relative to conflicts with existing water lines and the proposed development. If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718. Sincerely, Richard A. Sarti, P.E. Engineering Manager Tucson Water Department RS:ka CC:File |
| 07/26/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | Addressing Comments may be found at the following link. Click on the Associated Documents and Plans button and open the documents folder: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO/Command?mode=permit&firstTime=true&number_key=dp16-0118&command=InitialProcess&SearchButton=Search DP16-0118 Mountain Vail Reserve / 1st Submittal is being Returned For Corrections. Please see Pima County Addressing’s sticky note comments in the attached drawing. I have also included a summary of the Addressing comments for your use. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0 Click here to search for Projects and Permits or to make a Payment Click here to search for Septic Records |
| 07/26/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See additional documents in PRO/SIRE July 26, 2016 City of Tucson CDRC Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: SWG Plan Review for DP16-0118 Mountain Vail Reserve / 1st Submittal Dear Ms. Gehlen: Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent rights-of-way to the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, an existing 2" gas main is located within the right-of-way of Rabbit Run Way and may be impacted by pavement saw cutting along the north edge of Rabbit Run Way and driveway grading into development. Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please be aware that SWG requires a minimum one-foot separation from distribution facilities and any proposed structures and two-foot separation from high pressure gas facilities. SWG requests the contractor use caution when working in the vicinity of gas facilities and protect and support gas facilities per Blue Stake requirements. SWG also requests that no trees be planted within close proximity to gas facilities due to root intrusion; therefore, SWG requires all tree placements have a minimum eight-foot clearance from the tree center line to existing or proposed gas facilities. Shrubs and bushes may be planted within the eight-foot clearance zone. All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner, including payment for conflict mitigation if applicable. Please include SWG in all future development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6049 or TUCSWGDevReview@swgas.com. Sincerely, Shawn Stoner Engineering Technician Southern Arizona Division Enc: SWG Contact Information and Excavators Responsibilities (pdf) |
| 07/29/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: Mountain Vail Reserve Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0118 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 1, 2016 DUE DATE: August 12, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 14, 2017. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and total number of pages are not readable on sheets 21 & 22. 2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP16-0118, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - Provide the rezoning case number, C9-06-16, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This includes sheets 12 & 22. 5. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Provide the annexation case number, C15-88-15, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This includes sheets 21 & 22. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Provide the prior subdivision case number, S07-173, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This includes sheets 21 & 22. 7. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Remove DSMR case number DS08-30 from all sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Sheet 5 lower left corner there is a street section call out, 1 on 6, there is not section 1 on sheet 6. 9. 2-06.4.9.O - Sheet 1 under 'TABULATIONS: TOTAL SITE" "PERIMETER YARD" you list "6' or 2/3 H" clarify if this for the subdivision perimeter or interior perimeter setbacks. 10. 2-06.4.9.O - Sheet 3, detail 1 under the note you list "10' or ¾". Per UDC Table 6.3-2.A Res Use Res. Zone which applies to this subdivision, the subdivision boundary perimeter yard setback should be listed as 6' or 2/3 H. 11. 2-06.4.9.O - Sheets 5 & 6 Keynote 2 references "10' or ¾". Per UDC Table 6.3-2.A Res Use Res. Zone which applies to this subdivision, the subdivision boundary perimeter yard setback should be listed as 6' or 2/3 H. 12. 2-06.4.9.S - At the southwest corner of Rabbit Run Way and Chevrolet Drive it is not clear what is happening with the sidewalk and curb that runs east of the corner. It appears that curb and sidewalk are proposed to close of Chevrolet Drive to the south, please clarify. 13. 2-06.4.9.S - Near the northeast corner of LOT 73 you call an accessible ramp. This ramp gives the impression that there should be some type of accessible route that crosses Miller Flats. If the is to provide access to COMMON AREA "A" to the north than some type of accessible ramp will be needed on the north side of Miller Flats. 14. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 15. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 16. 2-06.5.3.E - As an Architectural Variation Plan is require for this project and you have elected to wait until building plan, once approved a revision to the development package is required to provide the required information per UDC Article 8.7.3.M.1.d.(5). 17. 2-06.5.3.F - As an Privacy Mitigation Plan is require for this project and you have elected to wait until building plan, once approved a revision to the development package is required to provide the required information per UDC Article 8.7.3.M.2.(3).(f). 2-06.5.3.G - Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions 18. 2-06.5.3.G.1 Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/01/2016 | SSHIELD1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: Mountain Vail Reserve Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0118 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 1, 2016 DUE DATE: August 12, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 14, 2017. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and total number of pages are not readable on sheets 21 & 22. 2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP16-0118, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - Provide the rezoning case number, C9-06-16, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This includes sheets 12 & 22. 5. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Provide the annexation case number, C15-88-15, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This includes sheets 21 & 22. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Provide the prior subdivision case number, S07-173, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This includes sheets 21 & 22. 7. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Remove DSMR case number DS08-30 from all sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Sheet 5 lower left corner there is a street section call out, 1 on 6, there is not section 1 on sheet 6. 9. 2-06.4.9.O - Sheet 1 under 'TABULATIONS: TOTAL SITE" "PERIMETER YARD" you list "6' or 2/3 H" clarify if this for the subdivision perimeter or interior perimeter setbacks. 10. 2-06.4.9.O - Sheet 3, detail 1 under the note you list "10' or ¾". Per UDC Table 6.3-2.A Res Use Res. Zone which applies to this subdivision, the subdivision boundary perimeter yard setback should be listed as 6' or 2/3 H. 11. 2-06.4.9.O - Sheets 5 & 6 Keynote 2 references "10' or ¾". Per UDC Table 6.3-2.A Res Use Res. Zone which applies to this subdivision, the subdivision boundary perimeter yard setback should be listed as 6' or 2/3 H. 12. 2-06.4.9.S - At the southwest corner of Rabbit Run Way and Chevrolet Drive it is not clear what is happening with the sidewalk and curb that runs east of the corner. It appears that curb and sidewalk are proposed to close of Chevrolet Drive to the south, please clarify. 13. 2-06.4.9.S - Near the northeast corner of LOT 73 you call an accessible ramp. This ramp gives the impression that there should be some type of accessible route that crosses Miller Flats. If the is to provide access to COMMON AREA "A" to the north than some type of accessible ramp will be needed on the north side of Miller Flats. 14. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 15. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 16. 2-06.5.3.E - As an Architectural Variation Plan is require for this project and you have elected to wait until building plan, once approved a revision to the development package is required to provide the required information per UDC Article 8.7.3.M.1.d.(5). 17. 2-06.5.3.F - As an Privacy Mitigation Plan is require for this project and you have elected to wait until building plan, once approved a revision to the development package is required to provide the required information per UDC Article 8.7.3.M.2.(3).(f). 2-06.5.3.G - Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions 18. 2-06.5.3.G.1 Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/01/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Clarify the numbering of the proposed manholes; there are two labeled as S.M.H. #5 (sheet 8 of 22). 2. Lot 54 is labeled as lot 55 on sheet 7 of 22. |
| 08/01/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 08/05/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: August 5, 2016 DUE DATE: August 12, 2016 SUBJECT: Tentative Plat/FLD TO: Warren D. Thompson, PE LOCATION: 9627 S Crowley Brothers Drive REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP16-0118 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the case number (DP16-0118). 2) There is a conflict at the Northwest corner of sheet 10 at the discharge point from common area A. The keynote 11 callout is referring to 4 notched openings at 5' Off Center (O.C.). Cross Section detail 20/4 is calling out 12" openings spaced at 4' Off Center (O.C.) at the same location. Please clarify. 3) The pipe culvert analysis contained in Appendix C of the drainage report assumes a 0.0120 feet per foot slope for the 18" x 28.5" RC Arch Pipes that discharge into the common area A at the northwest corner of the site. This pipe slope results in a calculated discharge velocity of 9.43 fps. Section 8 of figure 4 from the drainage report shows a 1.71% slope for these pipes and detail 1/9 shows a 1.21% slope upstream of a grade break and a 2% slope downstream of the grade break. Please verify that the dimensions of the culvert outlet protection selected considers the actual outlet velocity in accordance with the requirements of Section 9.4.1 of the Drainage Standards Manual (UDC 7.14.4). Please check culvert outlet detail 17/4 accordingly. It appears this detail is calling out concrete vertical curb along the limits of the grouted rock. Please update accordingly. 4) Sheets 7 and 8 call out a detail cross section 1/6 across Trapper Ridge. Please clarify what detail should be called out at this location (1/4 or 2/4?). There are no details on sheet 6. Sheet 11 calls out detail 2/4 for this street. 5) The hydraulic street conveyance calculations for the street sections found in Appendix C of the drainage report accounts for one typical crown section and one warp section with 2% longitudinal slopes that provide street capacities of 82.88 cfs and 39.78 cfs respectively. Sheets 10 and 11 of the plans set shows longitudinal slopes of 0.98% to 1.21% for Trapper Ridge and 1.00%, 1.67% and 2.89% for Miller Flats. Rabbit Run shows a 0.94% slope on a warp section. Per AM 2-06.4.9N please provide hydraulic street conveyance calculations within the next submittal of the drainage report that support the longitudinal slopes called out on the plans. Please note that the cross slopes assumed in the hydraulic calculations (1.76 % and 1.875%) for the typical crown and warped roadway sections both have less than the 2% cross slopes as called out in details ¼ and 2/4 on sheet 4 of the plans. 6) There appear to be some alignment issues with the extension lines used on details 19/4 and 20/4. Please adjust extension lines, as needed, on all details to more clearly show dimensions per AM 2-06.4.9 7) Per AM 2-06.4.9N7 please label discharge values for the various 100-year flow values that enter and leave the site within the plans sheets. This would involve discharges into and out of channels and detention basins within or adjacent to the subdivision. Please also provide a flow value for drainage adjacent to the southwest corner of lot 11 on sheets 7 and 10. 8) Per Section 7.6.5 of the Drainage Standards Manual (UDC 7.14.4) the flow limits of the drainage within common area A on sheet 6 need to be shown to be at least 10 feet away from any proposed structural location. Figure 4, Developed Conditions Exhibit, for Mountain Vail Estates, provides hydraulic calculations as part of the appendices in this drainage report (ie. CH-1). This Figure shows a 10 foot wide bottom width for this channel. The grading plan on sheet 11 does not show a bottom width but shows a v-ditch being graded. Please provide calculations with proposed conditions hydraulic data to demonstrate compliance with this setback requirement. Please also show compliance with Section 7.6.5 of the Drainage Standards Manual as it relates to flows adjacent to lot 11 and the proposed structural location planned for this lot. Hydraulic calculations may be needed for this purpose. Line work showing the setback line on the plans to where structures can be placed is requested. 9) There is a typo in the third word of General note 11 on sheet 2. Please adjust accordingly. 10) Please call out basin side slopes per Section 3.6.1 of the Detention/Retention Manual (UDC 7.14.3). 11) Per TSM 2-01.8.1A differential grading requirements may apply to lots 42 and 43 on sheet 11. Please provide additional grading detail to show whether or not this criteria needs to be addressed. 12) Per TSM 2-01.12.3 please clarify via additional geotechnical recommendations the change in grades greater than 3 feet on lots 74 to 77 on sheet 11. Please review all other parts of the submittal for similar grade changes. The introduction (project information) section of the geotechnical report assumes finished grades will be within 3 feet of the existing grades. The above sited lots are being proposed for fills in excess of 5 feet. 13) Page 11 of the geotechnical report has a recommendation that Retention/detention basins shall be setback from structures at least 15 feet. Lots 292 to 294 of Mountain Vail Estates may contain structures closer than 15 feet to the property line. Please provide cultural survey data of the structures or areas where structures are permitted, for the adjacent subdivision such that the 15' setback can be demonstrated. 14) Per TSM 2-01.4.1C6 please incorporate the surface drainage recommendations contained on page 14 of the geotechnical report regarding the minimum 3 percent slope for 5 feet into the typical lot drainage pattern detail 3/2 on sheet 2. 15) Per Rezone condition 7c on sheet 2 and Section 4.3.1 (Requirements, Basin Side Slopes) (UDC 7.14.3) access slopes of 8:1 or flatter must be coordinated with these zones for easy exit during flooding. Continuous uniform slopes shall not exceed 20 percent of the basin perimeter. Please call out slope values to show compliance accordingly on various plans sheets. 16) Details 1/4, 2/4 and 19/4 on sheet 4 all refer to a detail number 5/3 for wedge curb. This detail callout should be updated to refer to detail number 4/4 on sheet 4. 17) Please update General Storm Drain Note 2 on sheet 9 to conform to Section 10.3, item 9 (UDC 7.14.4) to reflect the requirement for the use of RCP or approved equal for public storm sewers. Spiral Ribbed Pipe may not be used for publicly maintained storm sewer. 18) Keynote 8 should be called out instead of keynote 9 between lots 58 to 61 and lot 77 on sheet 10. A similar keynote callout on sheet 11 could be helpful between lots 62 to 65 and lots 75 to 76 and possibly lots 66 to 68. Detail 7/3 may also work depending on lot dimensions. 19) Page 35 of the SWPPP indicates that 14 acres will be disturbed. This is equivalent to 609,840 square feet. The disturbed area shown on sheet 9 of the plans is listed as only 562,444 square feet. Please update the disturbance numbers as appropriate. Since fees are based on area of disturbance, this may impact the cost of the permit. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 08/05/2016 | AHINES2 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department (ES) has completed our review of Project No. DP16-0118, Mountain Vail Reserve / 1st Submittal. This project consists of a 77 lot single family residential subdivision. The Development Package stated that APCs will be used to store refuse and recycle materials at each residence. The APCs will be rolled out to the curb on the day of servicing. The APCs will be screened from public view and adjacent developments while being stored at each residence. Review of the public roads proposed for the Mountain Vail Reserve development shows that sufficient roadway width is provided to allow for refuse truck access to the APC locations. There are no unusual designs of the roadways, such as dead end streets or hammerhead street alignments, that would impede the maneuverability of the refuse trucks to service the APCs. The Mountain Vail Reserve development is within the service area of ES in the City of Tucson. In summary, the proposed Mountain Vail Reserve residential subdivision plans are approved by ES from a solid waste standpoint. Please contact me if there are any questions concerning this review. Tom Ryan City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department |
| 08/09/2016 | AHINES2 | POLICE | REVIEW | Approved | I have no issues. Thank you, Kara Curtis Community Service Officer Tucson Police Department Operations Division Midtown 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 kara.curtis@tucsonaz.gov (520) 837-7428 |
| 08/11/2016 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 08/11/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 08/11/2016 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 08/11/2016 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/11/2016 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | See map in Documents folder in Associated Documents and Plans in PRO. Tucson Electric Power (TEP) approves the 1st submittal of the tentative plat for DP16-0118 Mountain Vail Reserve submitted July 19, 2016. Attached is a copy of TEP facilities map showing the existing facilities that possibly feed the subdivision. A 10’ x 10’ easement must be shown on the final plat for the existing junction cabinet (MTVL-20) located in Common Area A, page 5. The easement was previously dedicated by the original plat for Mountain Vail Shipley, Bk-65 @ Pg-25. If you have any questions, please contact me at 917-8745. Thank you, Liza Castillo Right-of-Way Agent II, Land Resources Tucson Electric Power & UNS Energy Corp. 520/917-8745 (o) 520/904-2668 (m) lcastillo@tep.com |
| 08/11/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP16-0118 Mountain Vail Reserve 08/16/2016 () Final Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (X) Approval () No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: MM DATE: 08/16/2016 COMMENTS Plan Tucson on the Future Growth Scenario Map identifies the project site as existing neighborhoods. Existing neighborhoods are primarily developed and largely built-out residential neighborhoods and commercial districts in which minimal new development and redevelopment is expected in the next several decades. The goal is to maintain the character of these neighborhoods, while accommodating some new development and redevelopment and encouraging reinvestment and new services and amenities that contribute further to neighborhood stability. Site DP16-0118 Mountain Vail Reserve is subject to rezoning C9-06-15 and complies with the required conditions. The Site is zoned R-1, and is in compliance with Plan Tucson. |
| 08/11/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/11/2016 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Tucson Parks and Recreation has no comments or concerns regarding this development. The plan indicates that the Esmond Station Greenway path shown in the "Pima Regional Trails System Master Plan" as #G018 will be constructed as part of this development along the historic railroad alignment. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/12/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Revise as requested by other agencies. |
| 08/15/2016 | AHINES2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Reqs Change | July 22, 2016 To: Warren D. Thompson Stantec Consulting Services, Inc ____________________________________ From: Hussein Al Zubaidi, EPT, PCRWRD (520) 724-6404 Subject: MOUNTAIN VAIL ESTATES PART H, LOTS 1-6 P16WS00059 DP - 1st Submittal The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby conditionally approves the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS) 2016 with the following conditions: 1. Sheet #2: General sewer notes need to be in compliance with PCRWRD general sewer notice, you can found it on Pima county website under Design Standards, Specifications & Details. https://webcms.pima.gov/cms/one.aspx?portalId=169&pageId=56988. The revisions can be submitted by PDF. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience. Cc. Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD Tom Porter, P.E., RWRD |
| 08/15/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See letter in Documents folder in Associated Documents and Plans button in PRO. No objections/ adverse comments. Traffic impact analysis is completed. See attached. Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler 1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 495-1455 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagregion.com ekramer@pagregion.com |
| 08/16/2016 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | Commenrs under traffic review |